Is Autonomy Always Beneficial for Work Engagement? A Six-year Four-Wave Follow-Up Study.

Q2 Psychology Journal for Person-Oriented Research Pub Date : 2020-09-10 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.17505/jpor.2020.22043
Piia Seppälä, Anne Mäkikangas, Jari J Hakanen, Asko Tolvanen, Taru Feldt
{"title":"Is Autonomy Always Beneficial for Work Engagement? A Six-year Four-Wave Follow-Up Study.","authors":"Piia Seppälä,&nbsp;Anne Mäkikangas,&nbsp;Jari J Hakanen,&nbsp;Asko Tolvanen,&nbsp;Taru Feldt","doi":"10.17505/jpor.2020.22043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Work engagement is expected to result from job resources such as autonomy. However, previous results have yielded that the autonomy-work engagement relationship is not always particularly strong. Whereas previous longitudinal studies have examined this relationship as an average at a specific point in time, this study examined whether this relationship is different within individuals from one time to another over the years. Furthermore, experiences of work engagement are expected to affect how employees benefit from autonomy, but no studies have so far investigated whether the initial level of work engagement affects the autonomy-work engagement relationship. This study aimed to first identify the different kinds of longitudinal relationship patterns between autonomy and work engagement, and then to investigate whether the identified relationship patterns differ in terms of the initial mean level of work engagement. The four-wave study was conducted among Finnish managers (<i>n</i> = 329) over a period of six years. Multilevel regression mixture analysis identified five relationship patterns. Four of the patterns showed a positive predictive relationship between autonomy and work engagement. However, the relationship was statistically significant in only one of these patterns. Furthermore, when the initial mean level of work engagement was high, autonomy related more strongly to work engagement. However, an atypical pattern was identified that showed a negative association between autonomy and work engagement. In this pattern, the mean level of work engagement was low. Consequently, autonomy may not always enhance work engagement; sometimes this relationship may even be negative.</p>","PeriodicalId":36744,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Person-Oriented Research","volume":"6 1","pages":"16-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842623/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Person-Oriented Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2020.22043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Work engagement is expected to result from job resources such as autonomy. However, previous results have yielded that the autonomy-work engagement relationship is not always particularly strong. Whereas previous longitudinal studies have examined this relationship as an average at a specific point in time, this study examined whether this relationship is different within individuals from one time to another over the years. Furthermore, experiences of work engagement are expected to affect how employees benefit from autonomy, but no studies have so far investigated whether the initial level of work engagement affects the autonomy-work engagement relationship. This study aimed to first identify the different kinds of longitudinal relationship patterns between autonomy and work engagement, and then to investigate whether the identified relationship patterns differ in terms of the initial mean level of work engagement. The four-wave study was conducted among Finnish managers (n = 329) over a period of six years. Multilevel regression mixture analysis identified five relationship patterns. Four of the patterns showed a positive predictive relationship between autonomy and work engagement. However, the relationship was statistically significant in only one of these patterns. Furthermore, when the initial mean level of work engagement was high, autonomy related more strongly to work engagement. However, an atypical pattern was identified that showed a negative association between autonomy and work engagement. In this pattern, the mean level of work engagement was low. Consequently, autonomy may not always enhance work engagement; sometimes this relationship may even be negative.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自主总是有利于工作投入吗?一项为期六年的四波随访研究。
工作投入预期来自工作资源,如自主性。然而,先前的研究结果表明,自主性与工作投入的关系并不总是特别强。之前的纵向研究将这种关系作为特定时间点的平均值进行了考察,而这项研究考察了这种关系在不同时间点的个体之间是否存在差异。此外,工作投入的体验预计会影响员工如何从自主性中获益,但迄今为止还没有研究调查初始工作投入水平是否会影响自主性-工作投入关系。本研究旨在首先识别自主性与工作投入之间的不同纵向关系模式,然后探讨所识别的关系模式在工作投入的初始平均水平方面是否存在差异。这项四波研究是在芬兰管理人员(n = 329)中进行的,为期六年。多水平回归混合分析确定了五种关系模式。其中四种模式显示了自主性和工作投入之间的正向预测关系。然而,这种关系在这些模式中只有一种具有统计学意义。此外,当初始平均工作投入水平较高时,自主性与工作投入的相关性更强。然而,我们发现了一个非典型的模式,显示了自主性和工作投入之间的负相关。在这种模式下,工作投入的平均水平很低。因此,自主权不一定能提高工作投入;有时这种关系甚至可能是消极的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Person-Oriented Research
Journal for Person-Oriented Research Psychology-Psychology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Further Critical Reflections on the Notion of a "Population Psychology". Meaning Matters: A Person-Centered Investigation of Meaning in Life, Future Time Perspective, and Well-Being in Young Adults. Transitions and Resilience in Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Multiple Single-Case Study. The 10th yearly volume of JPOR is complete. Comment on Lundh (2023)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1