Transferring face-to-face sessions to virtual sessions in surgical education: a survey-based assessment of a single academic general surgery program.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-09 DOI:10.1007/s10353-021-00691-2
Mauricio Gonzalez-Urquijo, David E Gonzalez-Hinojosa, Javier Rojas-Mendez, Mario Rodarte-Shade
{"title":"Transferring face-to-face sessions to virtual sessions in surgical education: a survey-based assessment of a single academic general surgery program.","authors":"Mauricio Gonzalez-Urquijo,&nbsp;David E Gonzalez-Hinojosa,&nbsp;Javier Rojas-Mendez,&nbsp;Mario Rodarte-Shade","doi":"10.1007/s10353-021-00691-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this survey-based study was to evaluate the implementation of virtual learning in a single academic general surgery program, compared with the well-established face-to-face academic curriculum used before.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April 2020 to the present, virtual sessions were created via Zoom Videos Communications, Inc. (San Jose, CA, USA). A survey composed of 15 questions about the perceived quality and utility of the virtual sessions was developed. The survey was sent out to all general surgery residents of a general surgery program in November of 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All residents enrolled in the program answered the survey, i.e., 22 (73.3%) men and 8 (26.7%) women with 6 (20.2%) residents per year (PGY 1-PGY 5). Over half of residents (<i>n</i> = 17, 56.7%) felt similar academic performance during online sessions when compared to the older model. Perceptions of the level of organization of academic sessions increased during the online model (<i>n</i> = 20, 66.7%). Twenty (66.7%) residents agreed it was easier to attend sessions during the online model. Fourteen (46.7%) residents reported their attendance to the sessions increased, and 14 (46.7%) residents would prefer this modality after the pandemic is over, with 8 (26.7%) being neutral about it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study, to our knowledge, is the first to survey general surgery residents about the transition from a face-to-face curriculum to an e‑learning curriculum. The demonstrated effectiveness of the transition from face-to-face academic activities to virtual activities makes it a feasible tool for graduate medical education programs to adjust to a virtual model.</p>","PeriodicalId":50475,"journal":{"name":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10353-021-00691-2","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-021-00691-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this survey-based study was to evaluate the implementation of virtual learning in a single academic general surgery program, compared with the well-established face-to-face academic curriculum used before.

Methods: From April 2020 to the present, virtual sessions were created via Zoom Videos Communications, Inc. (San Jose, CA, USA). A survey composed of 15 questions about the perceived quality and utility of the virtual sessions was developed. The survey was sent out to all general surgery residents of a general surgery program in November of 2020.

Results: All residents enrolled in the program answered the survey, i.e., 22 (73.3%) men and 8 (26.7%) women with 6 (20.2%) residents per year (PGY 1-PGY 5). Over half of residents (n = 17, 56.7%) felt similar academic performance during online sessions when compared to the older model. Perceptions of the level of organization of academic sessions increased during the online model (n = 20, 66.7%). Twenty (66.7%) residents agreed it was easier to attend sessions during the online model. Fourteen (46.7%) residents reported their attendance to the sessions increased, and 14 (46.7%) residents would prefer this modality after the pandemic is over, with 8 (26.7%) being neutral about it.

Conclusion: This study, to our knowledge, is the first to survey general surgery residents about the transition from a face-to-face curriculum to an e‑learning curriculum. The demonstrated effectiveness of the transition from face-to-face academic activities to virtual activities makes it a feasible tool for graduate medical education programs to adjust to a virtual model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将面对面会议转移到外科教育中的虚拟会议:对单一学术普外科计划的基于调查的评估。
背景:这项基于调查的研究的目的是评估虚拟学习在单一学术普外科项目中的实施情况,与之前使用的成熟的面对面学术课程进行比较。方法:从2020年4月至今,通过Zoom video Communications, Inc. (San Jose, CA, USA)创建虚拟会话。制定了一项由15个问题组成的关于虚拟会议的感知质量和效用的调查。该调查于2020年11月向普通外科项目的所有普通外科住院医师发送。结果:所有参加该计划的居民都回答了调查,即22名(73.3%)男性和8名(26.7%)女性,每年有6名(20.2%)居民(PGY 1-PGY 5)。超过一半的居民(n = 17,56.7%)与旧模式相比,在在线会议期间感到相似的学习成绩。对学术会议组织水平的感知在在线模式期间增加(n = 20,66.7%)。20名(66.7%)居民认为在线模式更容易参加会议。14名(46.7%)居民报告说他们参加会议的人数增加了,14名(46.7%)居民在大流行结束后更喜欢这种方式,8名(26.7%)居民对此持中立态度。结论:据我们所知,这项研究是第一个调查普外科住院医生从面对面课程到电子学习课程过渡的研究。从面对面的学术活动到虚拟活动的过渡所证明的有效性使其成为研究生医学教育项目适应虚拟模式的可行工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal European Surgery – Acta Chirurgica Austriaca focuses on general surgery, endocrine surgery, thoracic surgery, heart and vascular surgery. Special features include new surgical and endoscopic techniques such as minimally invasive surgery, robot surgery, and advances in surgery-related biotechnology and surgical oncology. The journal especially addresses benign and malignant esophageal diseases, i.e. achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett’s esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. In keeping with modern healthcare requirements, the journal’s scope includes inter- and multidisciplinary disease management (diagnosis, therapy and surveillance).
期刊最新文献
Remote training and evaluation of a simulator-based training course for complex endovascular procedures. Training in vascular trauma surgery for non-vascular surgeons: Vascular trauma surgery skills course. Coping with a lack of evidence: living-donor kidney transplantation in the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. 63rd Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society of Surgery. Delayed presentation of inflammatory breast carcinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1