Getting Real: The Maryland Healthcare Ethics Committee Network's COVID-19 Working Group Debriefs Lessons Learned.

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Hec Forum Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s10730-021-09442-y
Norton Elson, Howard Gwon, Diane E Hoffmann, Adam M Kelmenson, Ahmed Khan, Joanne F Kraus, Casmir C Onyegwara, Gail Povar, Fatima Sheikh, Anita J Tarzian
{"title":"Getting Real: The Maryland Healthcare Ethics Committee Network's COVID-19 Working Group Debriefs Lessons Learned.","authors":"Norton Elson, Howard Gwon, Diane E Hoffmann, Adam M Kelmenson, Ahmed Khan, Joanne F Kraus, Casmir C Onyegwara, Gail Povar, Fatima Sheikh, Anita J Tarzian","doi":"10.1007/s10730-021-09442-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Responding to a major pandemic and planning for allocation of scarce resources (ASR) under crisis standards of care requires coordination and cooperation across federal, state and local governments in tandem with the larger societal infrastructure. Maryland remains one of the few states with no state-endorsed ASR plan, despite having a plan published in 2017 that was informed by public forums across the state. In this article, we review strengths and weaknesses of Maryland's response to COVID-19 and the role of the Maryland Healthcare Ethics Committee Network (MHECN) in bridging gaps in the state's response to prepare health care facilities for potential implementation of ASR plans. Identified \"lessons learned\" include: Deliberative Democracy Provided a Strong Foundation for Maryland's ASR Framework; Community Consensus is Informative, Not Normative; Hearing Community Voices Has Inherent Value; Lack of Transparency & Political Leadership Gaps Generate a Fragmented Response; Pandemic Politics Requires Diplomacy & Persistence; Strong Leadership is Needed to Avoid Implementing ASR … And to Plan for ASR; An Effective Pandemic Response Requires Coordination and Information-Sharing Beyond the Acute Care Hospital; and The Ability to Correct Course is Crucial: Reconsidering No-visitor Policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":"33 1-2","pages":"91-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09442-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Responding to a major pandemic and planning for allocation of scarce resources (ASR) under crisis standards of care requires coordination and cooperation across federal, state and local governments in tandem with the larger societal infrastructure. Maryland remains one of the few states with no state-endorsed ASR plan, despite having a plan published in 2017 that was informed by public forums across the state. In this article, we review strengths and weaknesses of Maryland's response to COVID-19 and the role of the Maryland Healthcare Ethics Committee Network (MHECN) in bridging gaps in the state's response to prepare health care facilities for potential implementation of ASR plans. Identified "lessons learned" include: Deliberative Democracy Provided a Strong Foundation for Maryland's ASR Framework; Community Consensus is Informative, Not Normative; Hearing Community Voices Has Inherent Value; Lack of Transparency & Political Leadership Gaps Generate a Fragmented Response; Pandemic Politics Requires Diplomacy & Persistence; Strong Leadership is Needed to Avoid Implementing ASR … And to Plan for ASR; An Effective Pandemic Response Requires Coordination and Information-Sharing Beyond the Acute Care Hospital; and The Ability to Correct Course is Crucial: Reconsidering No-visitor Policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实事求是:马里兰州医疗伦理委员会网络 COVID-19 工作组总结经验教训。
应对重大流行病并根据危机护理标准规划稀缺资源的分配(ASR)需要联邦、州和地方政府与更广泛的社会基础设施进行协调与合作。尽管马里兰州在 2017 年发布了一项计划,并在全州范围内举办了公共论坛,但马里兰州仍然是少数几个没有州认可的 ASR 计划的州之一。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了马里兰州应对 COVID-19 的优势和不足,以及马里兰州医疗伦理委员会网络 (MHECN) 在弥补该州应对措施的不足,使医疗机构为可能实施的 ASR 计划做好准备方面所发挥的作用。确定的 "经验教训 "包括协商民主为马里兰州的 ASR 框架奠定了坚实的基础;社区共识是信息性的,而非规范性的;倾听社区的声音具有内在价值;缺乏透明度和政治领导力的缺失导致应对措施支离破碎;大流行病政治需要外交手腕和坚持不懈的努力;需要强有力的领导来避免实施 ASR......并为 ASR 做好计划;有效的大流行病应对措施需要急症医院之外的协调和信息共享;以及纠正方向的能力至关重要:重新考虑禁止访客政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
期刊最新文献
Medical-Legal Partnerships and Prevention: Caring for Unrepresented Patients Through Early Identification and Intervention. Organizational Ethics in Healthcare: A National Survey. Non-Psychiatric Treatment Refusal in Patients with Depression: How Should Surrogate Decision-Makers Represent the Patient's Authentic Wishes? What is a High-Quality Moral Case Deliberation?-Facilitators' Perspectives in the Euro-MCD Project. "Follow the Science" in COVID-19 Policy: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1