Perceptual Decision-Making in Children: Age-Related Differences and EEG Correlates.

Computational brain & behavior Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s42113-020-00087-7
Catherine Manning, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Anthony M Norcia, Gaia Scerif, Udo Boehm
{"title":"Perceptual Decision-Making in Children: Age-Related Differences and EEG Correlates.","authors":"Catherine Manning, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Anthony M Norcia, Gaia Scerif, Udo Boehm","doi":"10.1007/s42113-020-00087-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children make faster and more accurate decisions about perceptual information as they get older, but it is unclear how different aspects of the decision-making process change with age. Here, we used hierarchical Bayesian diffusion models to decompose performance in a perceptual task into separate processing components, testing age-related differences in model parameters and links to neural data. We collected behavioural and EEG data from 96 6- to 12-year-old children and 20 adults completing a motion discrimination task. We used a component decomposition technique to identify two response-locked EEG components with ramping activity preceding the response in children and adults: one with activity that was maximal over centro-parietal electrodes and one that was maximal over occipital electrodes. Younger children had lower drift rates (reduced sensitivity), wider boundary separation (increased response caution) and longer non-decision times than older children and adults. Yet, model comparisons suggested that the best model of children's data included age effects only on drift rate and boundary separation (not non-decision time). Next, we extracted the slope of ramping activity in our EEG components and covaried these with drift rate. The slopes of both EEG components related positively to drift rate, but the best model with EEG covariates included only the centro-parietal component. By decomposing performance into distinct components and relating them to neural markers, diffusion models have the potential to identify the reasons why children with developmental conditions perform differently to typically developing children and to uncover processing differences inapparent in the response time and accuracy data alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":72660,"journal":{"name":"Computational brain & behavior","volume":"4 1","pages":"53-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational brain & behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-020-00087-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children make faster and more accurate decisions about perceptual information as they get older, but it is unclear how different aspects of the decision-making process change with age. Here, we used hierarchical Bayesian diffusion models to decompose performance in a perceptual task into separate processing components, testing age-related differences in model parameters and links to neural data. We collected behavioural and EEG data from 96 6- to 12-year-old children and 20 adults completing a motion discrimination task. We used a component decomposition technique to identify two response-locked EEG components with ramping activity preceding the response in children and adults: one with activity that was maximal over centro-parietal electrodes and one that was maximal over occipital electrodes. Younger children had lower drift rates (reduced sensitivity), wider boundary separation (increased response caution) and longer non-decision times than older children and adults. Yet, model comparisons suggested that the best model of children's data included age effects only on drift rate and boundary separation (not non-decision time). Next, we extracted the slope of ramping activity in our EEG components and covaried these with drift rate. The slopes of both EEG components related positively to drift rate, but the best model with EEG covariates included only the centro-parietal component. By decomposing performance into distinct components and relating them to neural markers, diffusion models have the potential to identify the reasons why children with developmental conditions perform differently to typically developing children and to uncover processing differences inapparent in the response time and accuracy data alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童的感知决策:与年龄有关的差异和脑电图相关性。
随着年龄的增长,儿童对感知信息做出的决策会更快、更准确,但决策过程的不同方面是如何随年龄而变化的,目前尚不清楚。在此,我们使用分层贝叶斯扩散模型将知觉任务中的表现分解为不同的处理成分,测试模型参数中与年龄相关的差异以及与神经数据的联系。我们收集了 96 名 6 至 12 岁儿童和 20 名成人在完成运动辨别任务时的行为和脑电图数据。我们使用成分分解技术,在儿童和成人中识别出了两个反应锁定的脑电图成分,它们在反应之前具有渐增活动:一个是顶中央电极上的最大活动,另一个是枕骨电极上的最大活动。与年龄较大的儿童和成人相比,年龄较小的儿童漂移率较低(灵敏度降低),边界分隔较宽(反应谨慎度提高),无决定时间较长。然而,模型比较表明,儿童数据的最佳模型只包括漂移率和边界分离(非决策时间)的年龄效应。接下来,我们提取了脑电图成分中斜坡活动的斜率,并将其与漂移率进行协方差分析。两个脑电图成分的斜率都与漂移率呈正相关,但最佳脑电图协变量模型仅包括中央顶叶成分。通过将成绩分解成不同的成分并将它们与神经标记联系起来,扩散模型有可能找出发育障碍儿童与发育正常儿童成绩不同的原因,并发现仅在反应时间和准确性数据中不明显的处理差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Individual Variability in Neural Control Circuit Regulation Using Single-Subject fMRI Towards Dependent Race Models for the Stop-Signal Paradigm Modeling Time Cell Neuron-Level Dynamics Probabilistic Choice Induced by Strength of Preference An Extension and Clinical Application of the SIMPLE Model to the Free Recall of Repeated and Semantically Related Items
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1