Users' ambivalent sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Informatics for Health & Social Care Pub Date : 2021-06-02 Epub Date: 2021-02-24 DOI:10.1080/17538157.2021.1883027
Linda Nyholm, Regina Santamäki-Fischer, Lisbeth Fagerström
{"title":"Users' ambivalent sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare.","authors":"Linda Nyholm,&nbsp;Regina Santamäki-Fischer,&nbsp;Lisbeth Fagerström","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2021.1883027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humanoid robots have already been shown to be useful in healthcare. To ensure successful interactions with humanoid robots, is it essential that the factors that influence users' sense of security be understood. Ensuring patients' sense of security is considered a key principle of good caring. The aim of this study was to illuminate users' sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted. The participants consisted of five women and seven men aged 24-77. Before being interviewed, the participants were shown a video vignette with Pepper, a fully developed humanoid robot, used in the daily care of patients. The data material was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Most participants perceived the use of humanoid robots in healthcare to be both positive and negative. The overarching theme was: Ambivalent sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare. The four categories revealed were: Humanoid robots are both reliable and unreliable, Humanoid robots are both safe and unsafe, Humanoid robots are both likable and scary, and Humanoid robots are both caring and uncaring. Here we increased knowledge of whether patients perceive a sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare, including which fears users have. This is vital information that should be taken into consideration when further developing and introducing humanoid robots into the healthcare setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":"46 2","pages":"218-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538157.2021.1883027","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1883027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Humanoid robots have already been shown to be useful in healthcare. To ensure successful interactions with humanoid robots, is it essential that the factors that influence users' sense of security be understood. Ensuring patients' sense of security is considered a key principle of good caring. The aim of this study was to illuminate users' sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted. The participants consisted of five women and seven men aged 24-77. Before being interviewed, the participants were shown a video vignette with Pepper, a fully developed humanoid robot, used in the daily care of patients. The data material was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Most participants perceived the use of humanoid robots in healthcare to be both positive and negative. The overarching theme was: Ambivalent sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare. The four categories revealed were: Humanoid robots are both reliable and unreliable, Humanoid robots are both safe and unsafe, Humanoid robots are both likable and scary, and Humanoid robots are both caring and uncaring. Here we increased knowledge of whether patients perceive a sense of security with humanoid robots in healthcare, including which fears users have. This is vital information that should be taken into consideration when further developing and introducing humanoid robots into the healthcare setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医疗领域,用户对人形机器人的矛盾安全感。
人形机器人已经被证明在医疗保健方面很有用。为了确保与人形机器人的成功交互,了解影响用户安全感的因素是至关重要的。确保病人的安全感被认为是良好护理的关键原则。本研究的目的是阐明在医疗保健中使用人形机器人的用户安全感。进行了12次半结构化访谈。参与者包括5名女性和7名男性,年龄在24-77岁之间。在接受采访之前,参与者观看了一段视频,视频中有一个完全开发的人形机器人Pepper,用于病人的日常护理。采用定性内容分析法对资料进行分析。大多数参与者认为在医疗保健中使用人形机器人既有积极的一面,也有消极的一面。总体主题是:在医疗保健领域使用人形机器人的矛盾安全感。这四类机器人分别是:类人机器人既可靠又不可靠,类人机器人既安全又不安全,类人机器人既可爱又可怕,类人机器人既关心人又不关心人。在这里,我们增加了对患者是否在医疗保健中感受到人形机器人的安全感的了解,包括用户的恐惧。这是在进一步开发和将人形机器人引入医疗环境时应该考虑的重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus. The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems. Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects. Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome. Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of the infodemic scale. Personalized medicine meets artificial intelligence: beyond “hype”, towards the metaverse Technological acceptance and features needed in mobile health apps development for people living with dementia and their caregivers in Indonesia Alzheimer’s in the modern age: Ethical challenges in the use of digital monitoring to identify cognitive changes Self-care intervention using mobile apps for sexual and reproductive health in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1