Comparison of Protocols to Reduce Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Prescribed a Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor.

Q3 Medicine Diabetes Spectrum Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2337/ds20-0038
Rhea Teng, Martin Kurian, Kelly L Close, John B Buse, Anne L Peters, Charles M Alexander
{"title":"Comparison of Protocols to Reduce Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Prescribed a Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor.","authors":"Rhea Teng, Martin Kurian, Kelly L Close, John B Buse, Anne L Peters, Charles M Alexander","doi":"10.2337/ds20-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE</b> | Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are approved for type 1 diabetes in Europe and Japan, with off-label use in type 1 diabetes in the United States. Although there were no consistent approaches to risk mitigation in clinical trials of these agents, protocols have been developed to try to reduce the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, a validated risk mitigation strategy does not exist. We reviewed available DKA risk mitigation protocols to better understand the various strategies currently in use. <b>METHODS</b> | We conducted a search of the published medical literature and other medical information sources, including conference presentations, for protocols. We then categorized the information provided into guidance on patient selection, initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors, ketone monitoring, necessary patient action in the event of ketosis or DKA, and inpatient treatment of ketosis or DKA. <b>RESULTS</b> | Patient selection is generally similar among the protocols, although some require a minimum BMI and insulin dose. All protocols advocate routine measurement of ketones, although some insist on blood ketone tests. Although action steps for ketosis varies, all protocols advocate rapid patient intervention. The importance of evaluating ketones and acid-base balance even in the absence of hyperglycemia is emphasized by all protocols, as is the need to continue administering insulin until ketosis has resolved. <b>CONCLUSION</b> | DKA risk mitigation must be pursued systematically in individuals with type 1 diabetes, although the best strategy remains to be determined. Given the ongoing need for adjunctive therapies in type 1 diabetes and current use of SGLT2 inhibitors for this purpose, additional education and research are crucial, especially in the hospital environment, where DKA may not be diagnosed promptly and treated appropriately.</p>","PeriodicalId":39737,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"42-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887530/pdf/diaspectds200038.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds20-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE | Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are approved for type 1 diabetes in Europe and Japan, with off-label use in type 1 diabetes in the United States. Although there were no consistent approaches to risk mitigation in clinical trials of these agents, protocols have been developed to try to reduce the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, a validated risk mitigation strategy does not exist. We reviewed available DKA risk mitigation protocols to better understand the various strategies currently in use. METHODS | We conducted a search of the published medical literature and other medical information sources, including conference presentations, for protocols. We then categorized the information provided into guidance on patient selection, initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors, ketone monitoring, necessary patient action in the event of ketosis or DKA, and inpatient treatment of ketosis or DKA. RESULTS | Patient selection is generally similar among the protocols, although some require a minimum BMI and insulin dose. All protocols advocate routine measurement of ketones, although some insist on blood ketone tests. Although action steps for ketosis varies, all protocols advocate rapid patient intervention. The importance of evaluating ketones and acid-base balance even in the absence of hyperglycemia is emphasized by all protocols, as is the need to continue administering insulin until ketosis has resolved. CONCLUSION | DKA risk mitigation must be pursued systematically in individuals with type 1 diabetes, although the best strategy remains to be determined. Given the ongoing need for adjunctive therapies in type 1 diabetes and current use of SGLT2 inhibitors for this purpose, additional education and research are crucial, especially in the hospital environment, where DKA may not be diagnosed promptly and treated appropriately.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较各种方案,以减少接受钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 抑制剂治疗的 1 型糖尿病患者出现糖尿病酮症酸中毒。
目的 钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 (SGLT2) 抑制剂在欧洲和日本被批准用于治疗 1 型糖尿病,在美国被批准用于 1 型糖尿病的标示外治疗。虽然在这些药物的临床试验中没有一致的风险缓解方法,但已制定了一些方案来降低糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的风险。然而,目前还没有经过验证的风险缓解策略。我们回顾了现有的 DKA 风险缓解方案,以更好地了解目前使用的各种策略。方法 | 我们对已发表的医学文献和其他医学信息来源(包括会议演讲)进行了协议检索。然后,我们将所提供的信息分为患者选择指导、SGLT2 抑制剂的启动、酮体监测、患者在发生酮病或 DKA 时的必要行动以及酮病或 DKA 的住院治疗。结果:尽管有些方案要求最低体重指数(BMI)和胰岛素剂量,但各方案对患者的选择基本相似。所有方案都主张对酮体进行常规测量,但有些方案坚持进行血酮体检测。尽管针对酮症的行动步骤各不相同,但所有方案都主张对患者进行快速干预。所有方案都强调,即使在没有高血糖的情况下,也要对酮体和酸碱平衡进行评估,同时需要继续使用胰岛素,直到酮症缓解。结论 1 型糖尿病患者必须系统地降低 DKA 风险,但最佳策略仍有待确定。鉴于 1 型糖尿病患者对辅助疗法的持续需求以及目前 SGLT2 抑制剂在这方面的应用,开展更多的教育和研究至关重要,尤其是在医院环境中,因为 DKA 可能无法得到及时诊断和适当治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Spectrum
Diabetes Spectrum Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The mission of Diabetes Spectrum: From Research to Practice is to assist health care professionals in the development of strategies to individualize treatment and diabetes self-management education for improved quality of life and diabetes control. These goals are achieved by presenting review as well as original, peer-reviewed articles on topics in clinical diabetes management, professional and patient education, nutrition, behavioral science and counseling, educational program development, and advocacy. In each issue, the FROM RESEARCH TO PRACTICE section explores, in depth, a diabetes care topic and provides practical application of current research findings.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Care at Summer Camps. Diabetes in Diverse Settings. Managing Type 1 Diabetes in an Inpatient Child Psychiatric Care Setting. Multidisciplinary Diabetes Management and Education Strategies in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting. Standardizing Diabetes Care in Colorado Schools: Nearly Two Decades of Success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1