Efficacy and Tolerance of Vascular Electrical Stimulation Therapy in the Management of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: A Phase II Single-Centre Randomized Study in Ivory Coast.

Q3 Medicine Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2021-02-04 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/1373754
Renée-Paule Botti, Sie Saïda Bokoum, Etienne L'Hermite, Dohoma Alexis Silue, Boidy Kouakou, Sarah Anastasie Bognini, Serge Arnaud Agoua, Edgar Mandeng Ma Linwa, Roméo Ayemou, Kouassi Gustave Koffi
{"title":"Efficacy and Tolerance of Vascular Electrical Stimulation Therapy in the Management of Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: A Phase II Single-Centre Randomized Study in Ivory Coast.","authors":"Renée-Paule Botti,&nbsp;Sie Saïda Bokoum,&nbsp;Etienne L'Hermite,&nbsp;Dohoma Alexis Silue,&nbsp;Boidy Kouakou,&nbsp;Sarah Anastasie Bognini,&nbsp;Serge Arnaud Agoua,&nbsp;Edgar Mandeng Ma Linwa,&nbsp;Roméo Ayemou,&nbsp;Kouassi Gustave Koffi","doi":"10.1155/2021/1373754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) is the primary cause of hospitalization in patients with sickle cell disease. Treatment mainly consists of intravenous morphine or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which have many dose-related side effects. The question arises as to whether vascular electrical stimulation therapy (VEST) could be effective or not on VOCs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the effectiveness and safety of VEST in reducing the median time spent in severe VOC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a phase II, single blinded, randomized, controlled, triple-arm, comparative trial. We included thirty (30) adult patients with severe vaso-occlusive crisis. The study arms were divided as follows: our control group (group 0) constituted of 10 patients followed with conventional therapy (Analgesics + Hydration + NSAIDs), while 20 patients were divided equally into two interventional arms-10 patients followed with VEST + Analgesics + Hydration (group 1) and the other 10 patients followed with VEST + Analgesics + Hydration + NSAIDs (group 2). The primary efficacy endpoint was median time to severe crisis elimination. The secondary end points were median time to end-of-crisis, median tramadol consumption, progress of the haemoglobin level over 3 days, side effects, and treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age ranged from 14 to 37 years, including 23 women. We noted a beneficial influence of the VEST on the median time to severe crisis (VAS greater than 2) elimination; 17 hours (group 1) against 3.5 hours (group 2) <i>p</i>=0.0166 and 4 hours (group 3) with <i>p</i> value = 0.0448. Similar significant results were obtained on the diminution of total duration of the crisis (VAS over 0) and median tramadol consumption in patients in the interventional arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These statistically significant results in the interventional arms suggest that VEST could be an alternative treatment of VOC in sickle cell patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7325,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Hematology","volume":"2021 ","pages":"1373754"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7896858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1373754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) is the primary cause of hospitalization in patients with sickle cell disease. Treatment mainly consists of intravenous morphine or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which have many dose-related side effects. The question arises as to whether vascular electrical stimulation therapy (VEST) could be effective or not on VOCs.

Objective: To measure the effectiveness and safety of VEST in reducing the median time spent in severe VOC.

Methods: We conducted a phase II, single blinded, randomized, controlled, triple-arm, comparative trial. We included thirty (30) adult patients with severe vaso-occlusive crisis. The study arms were divided as follows: our control group (group 0) constituted of 10 patients followed with conventional therapy (Analgesics + Hydration + NSAIDs), while 20 patients were divided equally into two interventional arms-10 patients followed with VEST + Analgesics + Hydration (group 1) and the other 10 patients followed with VEST + Analgesics + Hydration + NSAIDs (group 2). The primary efficacy endpoint was median time to severe crisis elimination. The secondary end points were median time to end-of-crisis, median tramadol consumption, progress of the haemoglobin level over 3 days, side effects, and treatment failure.

Results: The age ranged from 14 to 37 years, including 23 women. We noted a beneficial influence of the VEST on the median time to severe crisis (VAS greater than 2) elimination; 17 hours (group 1) against 3.5 hours (group 2) p=0.0166 and 4 hours (group 3) with p value = 0.0448. Similar significant results were obtained on the diminution of total duration of the crisis (VAS over 0) and median tramadol consumption in patients in the interventional arms.

Conclusion: These statistically significant results in the interventional arms suggest that VEST could be an alternative treatment of VOC in sickle cell patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管电刺激治疗镰状细胞病患者血管闭塞危象的疗效和耐受性:科特迪瓦的一项II期单中心随机研究
背景:血管闭塞危像(VOC)是镰状细胞病患者住院的主要原因。治疗主要包括静脉注射吗啡或非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),这些药物有许多剂量相关的副作用。血管电刺激疗法(VEST)对挥发性有机化合物是否有效是一个问题。目的:评价VEST在减少重度VOC患者中位时间方面的有效性和安全性。方法:我们进行了一项II期、单盲、随机、对照、三联对照试验。我们纳入了30例严重血管闭塞危象的成年患者。研究分组如下:对照组(0组)10例患者采用常规治疗(镇痛药+水合作用+ NSAIDs), 20例患者平均分为两组,其中10例患者采用VEST +镇痛药+水合作用(1组),另外10例患者采用VEST +镇痛药+水合作用+ NSAIDs(2组)。主要疗效终点为严重危象消除的中位时间。次要终点是到危机结束的中位时间、曲马多的中位用量、3天内血红蛋白水平的进展、副作用和治疗失败。结果:年龄14 ~ 37岁,其中女性23例。我们注意到VEST对严重危机(VAS大于2)消除的中位时间有有益的影响;17小时(1组)vs 3.5小时(2组)p=0.0166, 4小时(3组)p值= 0.0448。在介入组患者的危象总持续时间(VAS大于0)和曲马多中位消耗方面也获得了类似的显著结果。结论:在介入组中,这些具有统计学意义的结果表明,VEST可能是镰状细胞患者VOC的替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Hematology
Advances in Hematology Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Variability in Notification of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Sickle Cell Trait Across the United States. Early Molecular Response to Imatinib First-Line Therapy and Predictive Factors of Poor Outcomes for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Côte d'Ivoire. Relationships Between Markers of Iron Status and Hematological Parameters in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease. A Comparative Analysis of Hydroxyurea Treatment on Coagulation Profile Among Sickle Cell Anaemia Children in Lagos, Nigeria. Advancements in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: From Signaling Pathways to Targeted Therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1