Ventilatory Response to Hypercapnia as Experimental Model to Study Effects of Oxycodone on Respiratory Depression.

Lynn R Webster, Erik Hansen, Gregory J Stoddard, Austin Rynders, David Ostler, Harley Lennon
{"title":"Ventilatory Response to Hypercapnia as Experimental Model to Study Effects of Oxycodone on Respiratory Depression.","authors":"Lynn R Webster,&nbsp;Erik Hansen,&nbsp;Gregory J Stoddard,&nbsp;Austin Rynders,&nbsp;David Ostler,&nbsp;Harley Lennon","doi":"10.2174/1574884716666210225083213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid analgesics used to treat pain can cause respiratory depression. However, this effect has not been extensively studied, and life-threatening, opioid-induced respiratory depression remains difficult to predict. We tested the ventilatory response to hypercapnia for evaluating the pharmacodynamic effect of a drug on respiratory depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study on 12 healthy adult males. Subjects received 2 treatments (placebo and immediate-release oxycodone 30 mg) separated by a 24-hour washout period. Subjects inhaled a mixture of 7% carbon dioxide, 21% oxygen, and 72% nitrogen for 5 minutes to assess respiratory depression. Minute ventilation, respiratory rate, tidal volume, flow rate, end-tidal CO2, and oxygen saturation were recorded continuously at pre-dose and 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose. The primary endpoint was the effect on the ventilatory response to hypercapnia at 60 minutes post-dose, as assessed by the slope of the linear relationship between minute ventilation and end-tidal CO2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 60 minutes post-dose, subjects had a mean slope of 2.4 in the oxycodone crossover period, compared to 0.1 in the placebo period (mean difference, 2.3; 95% CI: 0.2 to 4.5; p = 0.035). Statistical significance was likewise achieved at the secondary time points (30, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose, p <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model for testing ventilatory response to hypercapnia discriminated the effect of 30 mg of oxycodone <i>vs</i>. placebo for up to 3 hours after a single dose. It may serve as a method to predict the relative effect of a drug on respiratory depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884716666210225083213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Opioid analgesics used to treat pain can cause respiratory depression. However, this effect has not been extensively studied, and life-threatening, opioid-induced respiratory depression remains difficult to predict. We tested the ventilatory response to hypercapnia for evaluating the pharmacodynamic effect of a drug on respiratory depression.

Methods: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study on 12 healthy adult males. Subjects received 2 treatments (placebo and immediate-release oxycodone 30 mg) separated by a 24-hour washout period. Subjects inhaled a mixture of 7% carbon dioxide, 21% oxygen, and 72% nitrogen for 5 minutes to assess respiratory depression. Minute ventilation, respiratory rate, tidal volume, flow rate, end-tidal CO2, and oxygen saturation were recorded continuously at pre-dose and 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose. The primary endpoint was the effect on the ventilatory response to hypercapnia at 60 minutes post-dose, as assessed by the slope of the linear relationship between minute ventilation and end-tidal CO2.

Results: At 60 minutes post-dose, subjects had a mean slope of 2.4 in the oxycodone crossover period, compared to 0.1 in the placebo period (mean difference, 2.3; 95% CI: 0.2 to 4.5; p = 0.035). Statistical significance was likewise achieved at the secondary time points (30, 120, and 180 minutes post-dose, p <0.05).

Conclusions: This model for testing ventilatory response to hypercapnia discriminated the effect of 30 mg of oxycodone vs. placebo for up to 3 hours after a single dose. It may serve as a method to predict the relative effect of a drug on respiratory depression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以高碳酸血症通气反应为实验模型研究氧可酮对呼吸抑制的影响。
背景:用于治疗疼痛的阿片类镇痛药可引起呼吸抑制。然而,这种影响尚未得到广泛研究,危及生命的阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制仍然难以预测。我们测试了对高碳酸血症的通气反应,以评估一种药物对呼吸抑制的药效学作用。方法:对12名健康成年男性进行随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、交叉研究。受试者接受2种治疗(安慰剂和羟考酮即刻释放30 mg),间隔24小时洗脱期。受试者吸入7%二氧化碳、21%氧气和72%氮气的混合物5分钟,以评估呼吸抑制。在给药前和给药后30、60、120、180分钟连续记录分钟通气量、呼吸频率、潮气量、流量、潮末CO2和血氧饱和度。主要终点是在给药后60分钟对高碳酸血症的通气反应的影响,通过分钟通气与潮末CO2之间的线性关系的斜率来评估。结果:在给药后60分钟,受试者在羟考酮交叉期的平均斜率为2.4,而安慰剂期的平均斜率为0.1(平均差为2.3;95% CI: 0.2 ~ 4.5;P = 0.035)。在给药后的次要时间点(30,120和180分钟)也取得了统计学意义。结论:该模型用于测试高碳酸血症的通气反应,区分了单次给药后30mg羟考酮与安慰剂长达3小时的效果。它可以作为预测药物对呼吸抑制的相对效果的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Leveraging Generative AI for Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance. The Effect of Dapagliflozin on Heart Function in Animal Models of Cardiac Ischemia, A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Spinal Analgesia: Initial Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Efficacy and Safety of Glycopyrrolate in the Management of Organophosphate and Carbamate Poisoning: A Systematic Review. Translational Approach Using Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products for Huntington's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1