Intrathecal Morphine Delivery at Cisterna Magna to Control Refractory Cancer-Related Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Q3 Medicine Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2020-10-15
Chang Sun, Yu-Tong Wang, Yu-Jie Dai, Zhi-Hui Liu, Jing Yang, Zhu-Qiang Cheng, Dao-Song Dong, Cheng-Fu Wang, Guo-Li Zhao, Gui-Jun Lu, Tao Song, Yi Jin, Li-Li Sun, Alan D Kaye, Ivan Urits, Omar Viswanath, Yong-Hai Sun
{"title":"Intrathecal Morphine Delivery at Cisterna Magna to Control Refractory Cancer-Related Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Chang Sun,&nbsp;Yu-Tong Wang,&nbsp;Yu-Jie Dai,&nbsp;Zhi-Hui Liu,&nbsp;Jing Yang,&nbsp;Zhu-Qiang Cheng,&nbsp;Dao-Song Dong,&nbsp;Cheng-Fu Wang,&nbsp;Guo-Li Zhao,&nbsp;Gui-Jun Lu,&nbsp;Tao Song,&nbsp;Yi Jin,&nbsp;Li-Li Sun,&nbsp;Alan D Kaye,&nbsp;Ivan Urits,&nbsp;Omar Viswanath,&nbsp;Yong-Hai Sun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For patients suffering from primary or metastatic cancer above the middle thoracic vertebrae, refractory pain management still remains a great challenge. Theoretically, inserting a catheter tip into the cisterna magna may be a promising solution. However, at present, there have been no reliable data regarding this novel technique. We therefore investigated the efficacy and safety of an advanced approach for pain relief in a specific population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty participants from two hospitals received the intrathecal deliveries of opioid to either one of two sites: cisterna magna (n = 15) or lower thoracic region (n = 15). Pain relief (visual analogue scale, VAS), quality of life (short form (36) health survey, SF-36) as well as depression (self-rating depression scale, SDS) were assessed in the follow-up visits and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving intrathecal morphine delivery to cisterna magna achieved greater pain improvement indicated as significant decrease of VAS scores at day 1 and 7, and achieved better improvement in physical function (day 7 and 30), role physical (day 7 and 30), body pain (day 7, 30 and 90), general health (day 7, 30 and 90), vitality (day 7, 30 and 90), social function (day 90), role emotional (day 7 and 90), mental health (day 7, 30 and 90) and SDS (day 1 and 7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intrathecal morphine delivery to cisterna magna might be an effective and safe technique for patients suffering from cancer at the middle thoracic vertebrae or above to control refractory pain. Trial registration: No. ChiCTR-ONN-17010681.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"50 4 Suppl 1","pages":"48-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901124/pdf/PB-50-4S1-48.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For patients suffering from primary or metastatic cancer above the middle thoracic vertebrae, refractory pain management still remains a great challenge. Theoretically, inserting a catheter tip into the cisterna magna may be a promising solution. However, at present, there have been no reliable data regarding this novel technique. We therefore investigated the efficacy and safety of an advanced approach for pain relief in a specific population.

Methods: Thirty participants from two hospitals received the intrathecal deliveries of opioid to either one of two sites: cisterna magna (n = 15) or lower thoracic region (n = 15). Pain relief (visual analogue scale, VAS), quality of life (short form (36) health survey, SF-36) as well as depression (self-rating depression scale, SDS) were assessed in the follow-up visits and compared between the two groups.

Results: Patients receiving intrathecal morphine delivery to cisterna magna achieved greater pain improvement indicated as significant decrease of VAS scores at day 1 and 7, and achieved better improvement in physical function (day 7 and 30), role physical (day 7 and 30), body pain (day 7, 30 and 90), general health (day 7, 30 and 90), vitality (day 7, 30 and 90), social function (day 90), role emotional (day 7 and 90), mental health (day 7, 30 and 90) and SDS (day 1 and 7).

Conclusions: Intrathecal morphine delivery to cisterna magna might be an effective and safe technique for patients suffering from cancer at the middle thoracic vertebrae or above to control refractory pain. Trial registration: No. ChiCTR-ONN-17010681.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大池鞘内注入吗啡以控制难治性癌症相关疼痛:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:对于胸椎中部以上的原发性或转移性癌症患者,难治性疼痛管理仍然是一个巨大的挑战。理论上,将导管尖端插入大池可能是一个有希望的解决方案。然而,目前还没有关于这种新技术的可靠数据。因此,我们在特定人群中研究了一种缓解疼痛的先进方法的有效性和安全性。方法:来自两家医院的30名参与者接受了鞘内阿片类药物输送到两个部位之一:大池(n = 15)或下胸区(n = 15)。在随访中评估两组患者的疼痛缓解(视觉模拟量表,VAS)、生活质量(SF-36短表健康调查,SF-36)和抑郁(抑郁自评量表,SDS)并进行比较。结果:患者鞘内吗啡交付小脑延髓池实现了更大的疼痛改善表示的脉管成绩显著下降1和7天,并取得更好的改善身体功能(7至30天),物理作用(7至30天),身体疼痛(第七天、30和90年),一般健康(第七天、30和90年)、活力(第七天、30和90年),社会功能(90天),角色情感(7 - 90天),心理健康(第七天、30和90)和SDS(1和7天).Conclusions:鞘内注射吗啡到大池可能是一种有效和安全的技术,以控制难治性疼痛的患者在胸椎中部或以上的癌症。试验报名:No。chictr onn - 17010681。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology bulletin
Psychopharmacology bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Related to Duloxetine-Atomoxetine Combination in an Adolescent with ADHD and Comorbid GAD. On the Origins of MAOI Misconceptions: Reaffirming their Role in Melancholic Depression. Alzheimer's and Dementia Guidelines and Tables. Captagone & Morbid Jealousy. Are Standardized Tests Sensitive to Early Cognitive Change in Parkinson's Disease?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1