Determining the feasibility of an index of the social determinants of health using data from public sources.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Informatics for Health & Social Care Pub Date : 2021-06-02 Epub Date: 2021-02-25 DOI:10.1080/17538157.2021.1880413
Andrew Wang, Abel N Kho, Bernard Black, Dustin D French
{"title":"Determining the feasibility of an index of the social determinants of health using data from public sources.","authors":"Andrew Wang,&nbsp;Abel N Kho,&nbsp;Bernard Black,&nbsp;Dustin D French","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2021.1880413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Examining the feasibility of developing an index measure for the social determinants of health using public data is needed. We examined these characteristics at the ZIP code in California and New York using public data extracted from the US Census, American Community Survey, the USDA Food Research Access Atlas, and the Dartmouth Atlas. We conducted a retrospective study from 2000 to 2017. The main outcome was a novel index measure representing six domains (economic stability, neighborhood and physical environment, education, community and social context, food access, and health care) and encompassing 13 items. The index measure at the ZIP code was created using principal component analysis, normalized to \"0\" worse and \"1\" better in California (ZIP codes n = 1,447 to 1,515) and New York (ZIP codes n = 1,211 to 1,298). We assessed the reliability and conducted a nonparametric comparison to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation County Health Rankings, Area Deprivation Index, Social Deprivation Index, and GINI Index. These measures shared similarities and differences with the novel measure. Mapping of this novel measure showed regional variation. As a result, developing a universal social determinants of health measure is feasible and more research is needed to link it to health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":"46 2","pages":"205-217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538157.2021.1880413","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1880413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Examining the feasibility of developing an index measure for the social determinants of health using public data is needed. We examined these characteristics at the ZIP code in California and New York using public data extracted from the US Census, American Community Survey, the USDA Food Research Access Atlas, and the Dartmouth Atlas. We conducted a retrospective study from 2000 to 2017. The main outcome was a novel index measure representing six domains (economic stability, neighborhood and physical environment, education, community and social context, food access, and health care) and encompassing 13 items. The index measure at the ZIP code was created using principal component analysis, normalized to "0" worse and "1" better in California (ZIP codes n = 1,447 to 1,515) and New York (ZIP codes n = 1,211 to 1,298). We assessed the reliability and conducted a nonparametric comparison to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation County Health Rankings, Area Deprivation Index, Social Deprivation Index, and GINI Index. These measures shared similarities and differences with the novel measure. Mapping of this novel measure showed regional variation. As a result, developing a universal social determinants of health measure is feasible and more research is needed to link it to health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用公共来源的数据确定健康的社会决定因素指数的可行性。
需要审查利用公共数据为健康的社会决定因素制定指数措施的可行性。我们使用从美国人口普查、美国社区调查、美国农业部食品研究访问地图集和达特茅斯地图集中提取的公共数据,在加利福尼亚和纽约的邮政编码中检查了这些特征。我们从2000年到2017年进行了回顾性研究。主要成果是一个新的指数测量,代表六个领域(经济稳定、邻里和自然环境、教育、社区和社会背景、食物获取和医疗保健),包括13个项目。邮政编码的指数度量是使用主成分分析创建的,在加利福尼亚(邮政编码n = 1447至1515)和纽约(邮政编码n = 1211至1298),归一化为“0”差和“1”好。我们评估了可靠性,并对罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会县健康排名、地区剥夺指数、社会剥夺指数和基尼指数进行了非参数比较。这些测量方法与新测量方法既有相似之处,也有不同之处。这种新测量方法的制图显示出区域差异。因此,制定一项普遍的健康社会决定因素措施是可行的,需要进行更多的研究,将其与健康结果联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus. The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems. Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects. Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome. Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of the infodemic scale. Personalized medicine meets artificial intelligence: beyond “hype”, towards the metaverse Technological acceptance and features needed in mobile health apps development for people living with dementia and their caregivers in Indonesia Alzheimer’s in the modern age: Ethical challenges in the use of digital monitoring to identify cognitive changes Self-care intervention using mobile apps for sexual and reproductive health in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1