Smoothing Corrections for Improving Sample Size Recalculation Rules in Adaptive Group Sequential Study Designs.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Methods of Information in Medicine Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1721727
Carolin Herrmann, Geraldine Rauch
{"title":"Smoothing Corrections for Improving Sample Size Recalculation Rules in Adaptive Group Sequential Study Designs.","authors":"Carolin Herrmann,&nbsp;Geraldine Rauch","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1721727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An adequate sample size calculation is essential for designing a successful clinical trial. One way to tackle planning difficulties regarding parameter assumptions required for sample size calculation is to adapt the sample size during the ongoing trial.This can be attained by adaptive group sequential study designs. At a predefined timepoint, the interim effect is tested for significance. Based on the interim test result, the trial is either stopped or continued with the possibility of a sample size recalculation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sample size recalculation rules have different limitations in application like a high variability of the recalculated sample size. Hence, the goal is to provide a tool to counteract this performance limitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sample size recalculation rules can be interpreted as functions of the observed interim effect. Often, a \"jump\" from the first stage's sample size to the maximal sample size at a rather arbitrarily chosen interim effect size is implemented and the curve decreases monotonically afterwards. This jump is one reason for a high variability of the sample size. In this work, we investigate how the shape of the recalculation function can be improved by implementing a smoother increase of the sample size. The design options are evaluated by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Evaluation criteria are univariate performance measures such as the conditional power and sample size as well as a conditional performance score which combines these components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate that smoothing corrections can reduce variability in conditional power and sample size as well as they increase the performance with respect to a recently published conditional performance score for medium and large standardized effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the simulation study, we present a tool that is easily implemented to improve sample size recalculation rules. The approach can be combined with existing sample size recalculation rules described in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":"60 1-02","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0040-1721727","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: An adequate sample size calculation is essential for designing a successful clinical trial. One way to tackle planning difficulties regarding parameter assumptions required for sample size calculation is to adapt the sample size during the ongoing trial.This can be attained by adaptive group sequential study designs. At a predefined timepoint, the interim effect is tested for significance. Based on the interim test result, the trial is either stopped or continued with the possibility of a sample size recalculation.

Objectives: Sample size recalculation rules have different limitations in application like a high variability of the recalculated sample size. Hence, the goal is to provide a tool to counteract this performance limitation.

Methods: Sample size recalculation rules can be interpreted as functions of the observed interim effect. Often, a "jump" from the first stage's sample size to the maximal sample size at a rather arbitrarily chosen interim effect size is implemented and the curve decreases monotonically afterwards. This jump is one reason for a high variability of the sample size. In this work, we investigate how the shape of the recalculation function can be improved by implementing a smoother increase of the sample size. The design options are evaluated by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Evaluation criteria are univariate performance measures such as the conditional power and sample size as well as a conditional performance score which combines these components.

Results: We demonstrate that smoothing corrections can reduce variability in conditional power and sample size as well as they increase the performance with respect to a recently published conditional performance score for medium and large standardized effect sizes.

Conclusion: Based on the simulation study, we present a tool that is easily implemented to improve sample size recalculation rules. The approach can be combined with existing sample size recalculation rules described in the literature.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自适应组序贯研究设计中改进样本量重计算规则的平滑修正。
背景:充分的样本量计算是设计一个成功的临床试验的必要条件。解决关于样本量计算所需参数假设的规划困难的一种方法是在正在进行的试验中调整样本量。这可以通过自适应组序贯研究设计来实现。在一个预定义的时间点,检验中间效应的显著性。根据中期试验结果,停止或继续试验,并可能重新计算样本量。目的:样本量重计算规则在应用中有不同的局限性,如重新计算的样本量的高可变性。因此,我们的目标是提供一种工具来抵消这种性能限制。方法:样本量重新计算规则可以解释为观察到的中间效应的函数。通常,从第一阶段的样本量“跳跃”到一个相当任意选择的中间效应大小的最大样本量,然后曲线单调下降。这种跳跃是样本量变化很大的原因之一。在这项工作中,我们研究了如何通过实现更平滑的样本量增加来改善重新计算函数的形状。通过蒙特卡罗仿真对设计方案进行了评价。评估标准是单变量性能度量,如条件功率和样本量,以及结合这些成分的条件性能分数。结果:我们证明,平滑修正可以减少条件功率和样本量的可变性,并且相对于最近发表的中等和大型标准化效应大小的条件性能分数,它们可以提高性能。结论:在模拟研究的基础上,我们提出了一个易于实现的工具,以改善样本大小的重新计算规则。该方法可以与文献中描述的现有样本量重新计算规则相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
期刊最新文献
Cross-lingual Natural Language Processing on Limited Annotated Case/Radiology Reports in English and Japanese: Insights from the Real-MedNLP Workshop. Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Contrast Medium Doses for Computed Tomography Angiography Using Optimized Clinical Parameter Sets. Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Algorithm to Pseudonymize Documents in the Context of a Clinical Data Warehouse. Deep Learning for Predicting Progression of Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Based on Lateral Knee Radiographs, Demographic Data, and Symptomatic Assessments. Europe's Largest Research Infrastructure for Curated Medical Data Models with Semantic Annotations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1