Best Practices for Virtual Engagement of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Teams During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Participatory Medicine Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI:10.2196/24966
Erin K Thayer, Molly Pam, Morhaf Al Achkar, Laura Mentch, Georgia Brown, Traci M Kazmerski, Emily Godfrey
{"title":"Best Practices for Virtual Engagement of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Teams During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Erin K Thayer,&nbsp;Molly Pam,&nbsp;Morhaf Al Achkar,&nbsp;Laura Mentch,&nbsp;Georgia Brown,&nbsp;Traci M Kazmerski,&nbsp;Emily Godfrey","doi":"10.2196/24966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) engages patients as partners in research and focuses on questions and outcomes that are important to patients. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced PCOR teams to engage through web-based platforms rather than in person. Similarly, virtual engagement is the only safe alternative for members of the cystic fibrosis (CF) community, who spend their lives following strict infection control guidelines and are already restricted from in-person interactions. In the absence of universal best practices, the CF community has developed its own guidelines to help PCOR teams engage through web-based platforms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify the important attributes, facilitators, and barriers to teams when selecting web-based platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews with CF community members, nonprofit stakeholders, and researchers to obtain information regarding their experience with using web-based platforms, including the effectiveness and efficiency of these platforms and their satisfaction with and confidence while using each platform. Interviews conducted via Zoom were audio recorded and transcribed. We identified key themes through content analysis with an iterative, inductive, and deductive coding process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 15 participants reported using web-based platforms for meetings, project management, document sharing, scheduling, and communication. When selecting web-based platforms, participants valued their accessibility, ease of use, and integration with other platforms. Participants speculated that successful web-based collaboration involved platforms that emulate in-person interactions, recognized the digital literacy levels of the team members, intentionally aligned platforms with collaboration goals, and achieved team member buy-in to adopt new platforms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful web-based engagement in PCOR requires the use of multiple platforms in order to fully meet the asynchronous or synchronous goals of the project. This study identified the key attributes for the successful practice of PCOR on web-based platforms and the common challenges and solutions associated with their use. Our findings provide the best practices for selecting platforms and the lessons learned through web-based PCOR collaborations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"e24966"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7954110/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/24966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) engages patients as partners in research and focuses on questions and outcomes that are important to patients. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced PCOR teams to engage through web-based platforms rather than in person. Similarly, virtual engagement is the only safe alternative for members of the cystic fibrosis (CF) community, who spend their lives following strict infection control guidelines and are already restricted from in-person interactions. In the absence of universal best practices, the CF community has developed its own guidelines to help PCOR teams engage through web-based platforms.

Objective: This study aimed to identify the important attributes, facilitators, and barriers to teams when selecting web-based platforms.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with CF community members, nonprofit stakeholders, and researchers to obtain information regarding their experience with using web-based platforms, including the effectiveness and efficiency of these platforms and their satisfaction with and confidence while using each platform. Interviews conducted via Zoom were audio recorded and transcribed. We identified key themes through content analysis with an iterative, inductive, and deductive coding process.

Results: In total, 15 participants reported using web-based platforms for meetings, project management, document sharing, scheduling, and communication. When selecting web-based platforms, participants valued their accessibility, ease of use, and integration with other platforms. Participants speculated that successful web-based collaboration involved platforms that emulate in-person interactions, recognized the digital literacy levels of the team members, intentionally aligned platforms with collaboration goals, and achieved team member buy-in to adopt new platforms.

Conclusions: Successful web-based engagement in PCOR requires the use of multiple platforms in order to fully meet the asynchronous or synchronous goals of the project. This study identified the key attributes for the successful practice of PCOR on web-based platforms and the common challenges and solutions associated with their use. Our findings provide the best practices for selecting platforms and the lessons learned through web-based PCOR collaborations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行期间和之后,以患者为中心的结果研究团队虚拟参与的最佳实践:定性研究。
背景:以患者为中心的结局研究(PCOR)将患者作为研究的合作伙伴,关注对患者重要的问题和结果。COVID-19大流行迫使PCOR团队通过网络平台而不是亲自参与。同样,对于囊性纤维化(CF)群体的成员来说,虚拟接触是唯一安全的选择,他们一生都在严格遵守感染控制准则,并且已经限制了面对面的互动。在缺乏通用的最佳实践的情况下,CF社区开发了自己的指导方针,以帮助PCOR团队通过基于web的平台进行参与。目的:本研究旨在确定团队在选择网络平台时的重要属性、促进因素和障碍。方法:我们对CF社区成员、非营利利益相关者和研究人员进行了半结构化访谈,以获取有关他们使用基于网络平台的经验的信息,包括这些平台的有效性和效率以及他们在使用每个平台时的满意度和信心。通过Zoom进行的采访被录音并转录。我们通过迭代、归纳和演绎编码过程的内容分析来确定关键主题。结果:总共有15名参与者报告使用基于web的平台进行会议、项目管理、文档共享、调度和通信。当选择基于web的平台时,参与者看重其可访问性、易用性以及与其他平台的集成。参与者推测,成功的基于网络的协作涉及模仿面对面交互的平台,识别团队成员的数字素养水平,有意地使平台与协作目标保持一致,并使团队成员接受采用新平台。结论:成功的基于web的PCOR参与需要使用多个平台,以完全满足项目的异步或同步目标。本研究确定了PCOR在基于web的平台上成功实践的关键属性,以及与使用PCOR相关的常见挑战和解决方案。我们的研究结果为选择平台提供了最佳实践,并通过基于网络的PCOR合作提供了经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Value Propositions for Digital Shared Medication Plans to Boost Patient-Health Care Professional Partnerships: Co-Design Study. Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study. Using Community Engagement to Create a Telecoaching Intervention to Improve Self-Management in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Qualitative Study. Developing a Digital Tool to Calculate Protein Quality in Plant-Based Meals of Older Adults: User Engagement Design Approach With End Users. From English to "Englishes": A Process Perspective on Enhancing the Linguistic Responsiveness of Culturally Tailored Cancer Prevention Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1