Passive Fit Analysis of Laser-Sintered, Three-Unit Implant Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.11607/ijp.7261
Stefano Del Monte, Shakeel Shahdad, Phil Taylor
{"title":"Passive Fit Analysis of Laser-Sintered, Three-Unit Implant Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Stefano Del Monte,&nbsp;Shakeel Shahdad,&nbsp;Phil Taylor","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess if the implant-retained prostheses produced with laser-sintering technique present an accuracy and passive fit comparable to their milled counterpart.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two regular neck Straumann analogs were placed in a block of PMMA 15 mm apart and parallel to each other. The PMMA block was then scanned and two groups of cobalt-chromium, screw-retained, three-unit implant prostheses were fabricated using milling (control) and laser-sintering (test) techniques. The prostheses were then screwed on the PMMA block and the vertical marginal gap between the prostheses and the analogs at the implant-abutment junction was measured twice, (1) when only one screw was tightened, and (2) when both screws were fully tightened. The average of each marginal gap measurement was compared to assess the difference in term of passive fit between the laser-sintered and the milled prostheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean marginal gap of the milled and the laser-sintered groups were 23.18 µm (SD = 6.2) and 23.71 µm (SD = 19.5) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser-sintered prostheses presented a marginal fit comparable to their milled counterpart and represent a clinically valid alternative to their milled counterpart. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:e53-e60.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess if the implant-retained prostheses produced with laser-sintering technique present an accuracy and passive fit comparable to their milled counterpart.

Materials and methods: Two regular neck Straumann analogs were placed in a block of PMMA 15 mm apart and parallel to each other. The PMMA block was then scanned and two groups of cobalt-chromium, screw-retained, three-unit implant prostheses were fabricated using milling (control) and laser-sintering (test) techniques. The prostheses were then screwed on the PMMA block and the vertical marginal gap between the prostheses and the analogs at the implant-abutment junction was measured twice, (1) when only one screw was tightened, and (2) when both screws were fully tightened. The average of each marginal gap measurement was compared to assess the difference in term of passive fit between the laser-sintered and the milled prostheses.

Results: The mean marginal gap of the milled and the laser-sintered groups were 23.18 µm (SD = 6.2) and 23.71 µm (SD = 19.5) respectively.

Conclusions: Laser-sintered prostheses presented a marginal fit comparable to their milled counterpart and represent a clinically valid alternative to their milled counterpart. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:e53-e60.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光烧结三单元种植体假体的被动拟合分析:体外研究。
目的:评估用激光烧结技术生产的植入物保留假体是否具有与铣削假体相当的准确性和被动配合性。材料和方法:将两个规则颈Straumann类似物放置在相距15mm且彼此平行的PMMA块中。然后扫描PMMA块,并使用铣削(对照)和激光烧结(测试)技术制造两组钴铬螺钉固定的三单元植入假体。然后将假体拧在PMMA块上,并测量假体和类似物之间在植入物-基牙连接处的垂直边缘间隙两次,(1)当仅拧紧一个螺钉时,以及(2)当两个螺钉都完全拧紧时。比较每个边缘间隙测量的平均值,以评估激光烧结假体和铣削假体之间的被动配合差异。结果:铣削组和激光烧结组的平均边缘间隙分别为23.18µm(SD=6.2)和23.71µm(SD=19.5)。结论:激光烧结假体与铣削假体相比具有边缘匹配性,是铣削假体的临床有效替代品。Int J Prostodont 2023;36:e53-e60。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Prosthodontics
International Journal of Prosthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP) Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Abutment Screw Loosening in 24-Degree Angulation-Correcting and Straight Implants: An In Vitro Study. Analysis of Topography, Flexural Strength, and Microstructure of a Lithium Disilicate Glass- Ceramic after Surface Finishing. Aging and Fracture Resistance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Molar Crowns Fabricated from Lithium Disilicate Containing Virgilite. Comparison Between Interocclusal Registration Using Silicone Bite Registration Material and Intraoral Scanner on Clenching Strength. Satisfaction with Labial Reinforcement of Custom-Made Mouthguards Among a Cohort of Rugby Union Players: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1