[Teamwork and stress in routine interventions: an observational study of multiprofessional OR teams].

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Unfallchirurg Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-05 DOI:10.1007/s00113-021-00977-w
Stefanie Passauer-Baierl, Ulla Stumpf, Matthias Weigl
{"title":"[Teamwork and stress in routine interventions: an observational study of multiprofessional OR teams].","authors":"Stefanie Passauer-Baierl,&nbsp;Ulla Stumpf,&nbsp;Matthias Weigl","doi":"10.1007/s00113-021-00977-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective interprofessional teamwork and stress are important factors for quality of care and patient safety in the operating room (OR); however, there are just a few systematic investigations into the relationship of OR teamwork and occupational stress.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determination of the relationship between interdisciplinary OR teamwork and stress in routine procedures, for the whole OR team as well as individual professions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multimethod study with expert observations using a standardized observation tool (OTAS-D) and systematic self-reports of the entire OR team. A total of 64 elective interventions across different surgical departments were observed. Relationships were calculated using mixed-effects regression models with control of procedural and provider characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quality of the intraoperative teamwork was at a medium level. Reported stress during interventions was at comparatively low levels, with significant differences between the professions of surgery, nursing and anesthesiology. Members of the surgical team reported the highest stress levels. An association between teamwork and perceived stress could not be determined for the entire OR team; however, within the surgical sub-team there were significant positive correlations for the quality of teamwork and stress (as well as for the teamwork dimensions of collaboration and leadership). For the nursing sub-team, we observed significant negative correlations with overall teamwork as well as with the dimension team monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest a profession-specific relationship between OR teamwork and occupational stress. Further research is necessary to investigate to what extent successful OR teamwork during routine procedures contributes to intraoperative stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":49397,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00113-021-00977-w","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-021-00977-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Effective interprofessional teamwork and stress are important factors for quality of care and patient safety in the operating room (OR); however, there are just a few systematic investigations into the relationship of OR teamwork and occupational stress.

Objective: Determination of the relationship between interdisciplinary OR teamwork and stress in routine procedures, for the whole OR team as well as individual professions.

Methods: Multimethod study with expert observations using a standardized observation tool (OTAS-D) and systematic self-reports of the entire OR team. A total of 64 elective interventions across different surgical departments were observed. Relationships were calculated using mixed-effects regression models with control of procedural and provider characteristics.

Results: The quality of the intraoperative teamwork was at a medium level. Reported stress during interventions was at comparatively low levels, with significant differences between the professions of surgery, nursing and anesthesiology. Members of the surgical team reported the highest stress levels. An association between teamwork and perceived stress could not be determined for the entire OR team; however, within the surgical sub-team there were significant positive correlations for the quality of teamwork and stress (as well as for the teamwork dimensions of collaboration and leadership). For the nursing sub-team, we observed significant negative correlations with overall teamwork as well as with the dimension team monitoring.

Conclusion: The findings suggest a profession-specific relationship between OR teamwork and occupational stress. Further research is necessary to investigate to what extent successful OR teamwork during routine procedures contributes to intraoperative stress.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[常规干预中的团队合作与压力:多专业手术室团队的观察研究]。
背景:有效的跨专业团队合作和压力是手术室护理质量和患者安全的重要因素;然而,对手术室团队合作与职业压力关系的系统研究却很少。目的:探讨跨学科手术室团队合作与整个手术室团队及个别专业常规流程压力的关系。方法:采用标准化观察工具(OTAS-D)和整个手术室团队的系统自我报告进行专家观察的多方法研究。在不同的外科部门共观察到64种选择性干预。使用控制程序和提供者特征的混合效应回归模型计算关系。结果:术中团队合作质量处于中等水平。干预期间报告的压力水平相对较低,在外科、护理和麻醉学专业之间存在显著差异。手术小组成员的压力水平最高。在整个手术室团队中,团队合作与感知压力之间的关系无法确定;然而,在外科小组内部,团队合作质量和压力(以及协作和领导的团队合作维度)之间存在显著的正相关。对于护理小组,我们观察到整体团队合作以及维度团队监控显著负相关。结论:研究结果提示手术室团队合作与职业压力之间存在职业特异性关系。需要进一步研究在常规手术中成功的手术室团队合作在多大程度上有助于术中应激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Unfallchirurg
Unfallchirurg 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Unfallchirurg is an internationally recognised publication organ. The journal deals with all aspects of accident surgery and reconstruction surgery and serves the continuing medical education of surgeons and accident surgeons with own practices and those working in hospitals. Practically-oriented works provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of accident surgery. Besides the imparting of relevant background knowledge, the focus is on the assessment of scientific findings under consideration of practical experience. The reader is given concrete recommendations for his/her practical work.
期刊最新文献
[Implementation of a standardized clinical test kit for diagnostics of periprosthetic infections in the clinical routine. German version]. [Bifid median nerve as a coincidental finding in traumatology : Case report and review of the literature]. [3D printing in spinal surgery-Update]. [The role of color-coded duplex sonography in preoperative vascular diagnostics in plastic surgery]. [Update on 3D printing in the surgery of musculoskeletal tumors].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1