Ensuring Yoga Intervention Fidelity in a Randomized Preference Trial for the Treatment of Worry in Older Adults.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of alternative and complementary medicine Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-08 DOI:10.1089/acm.2020.0476
Stephanie J Sohl, Gretchen A Brenes, Carol Krucoff, Gena Hargis, Andrea Anderson, Michael E Miller, Suzanne C Danhauer
{"title":"Ensuring Yoga Intervention Fidelity in a Randomized Preference Trial for the Treatment of Worry in Older Adults.","authors":"Stephanie J Sohl,&nbsp;Gretchen A Brenes,&nbsp;Carol Krucoff,&nbsp;Gena Hargis,&nbsp;Andrea Anderson,&nbsp;Michael E Miller,&nbsp;Suzanne C Danhauer","doi":"10.1089/acm.2020.0476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Yoga for treatment of worry in older adults is an intervention that is especially likely to translate into real-world practice. Assessing treatment fidelity improves confidence that effective interventions can be consistently applied and allows researchers to explore if any null results for effectiveness are indeed the result of a lack of intervention efficacy or lack of proper intervention implementation. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This study describes treatment fidelity of a yoga intervention in a randomized preference trial that compared cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and yoga for the treatment of worry, anxiety, and sleep in worried older (≥60 years) adults. Established methods for assessing treatment fidelity of CBT guided the procedure for ensuring that the yoga intervention was delivered as intended. The yoga intervention consisted of 20, 75-min, in-person, group, gentle yoga classes held twice weekly. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Six female instructors (mean age = 64 years) taught 660 yoga classes that were videotaped. Ten percent of these classes, stratified by instructor, were randomly selected for review. The average adherence score for yoga instructors was 6.84 (range 4-8). The average competency scores were consistently high, with an average score of 7.24 (range 6-8). Teaching content not included in the protocol occurred in 26 (38.1%) sessions and decreased over time. Observed ratings of instructor adherence were significantly related to ratings of competency. Instructor adherence was also significantly associated with lower participant attendance, but not with any of the other process or outcome measures. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The larger range found in adherence relative to competence scores demonstrated that teaching a yoga class according to a protocol requires different skills than competently teaching a yoga class in the community, and these skills improved with feedback. These results may foster dialog between the yoga research and practice communities. Clinical Trial Registration No.: NCT02968238.</p>","PeriodicalId":14944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","volume":"27 6","pages":"489-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Yoga for treatment of worry in older adults is an intervention that is especially likely to translate into real-world practice. Assessing treatment fidelity improves confidence that effective interventions can be consistently applied and allows researchers to explore if any null results for effectiveness are indeed the result of a lack of intervention efficacy or lack of proper intervention implementation. Methods: This study describes treatment fidelity of a yoga intervention in a randomized preference trial that compared cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and yoga for the treatment of worry, anxiety, and sleep in worried older (≥60 years) adults. Established methods for assessing treatment fidelity of CBT guided the procedure for ensuring that the yoga intervention was delivered as intended. The yoga intervention consisted of 20, 75-min, in-person, group, gentle yoga classes held twice weekly. Results: Six female instructors (mean age = 64 years) taught 660 yoga classes that were videotaped. Ten percent of these classes, stratified by instructor, were randomly selected for review. The average adherence score for yoga instructors was 6.84 (range 4-8). The average competency scores were consistently high, with an average score of 7.24 (range 6-8). Teaching content not included in the protocol occurred in 26 (38.1%) sessions and decreased over time. Observed ratings of instructor adherence were significantly related to ratings of competency. Instructor adherence was also significantly associated with lower participant attendance, but not with any of the other process or outcome measures. Conclusions: The larger range found in adherence relative to competence scores demonstrated that teaching a yoga class according to a protocol requires different skills than competently teaching a yoga class in the community, and these skills improved with feedback. These results may foster dialog between the yoga research and practice communities. Clinical Trial Registration No.: NCT02968238.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在老年人焦虑治疗的随机偏好试验中确保瑜伽干预的保真度。
导读:瑜伽对老年人焦虑的治疗是一种特别有可能转化为现实世界实践的干预措施。评估治疗保真度提高了对有效干预措施可以持续应用的信心,并允许研究人员探索有效性的任何无效结果是否确实是缺乏干预效果或缺乏适当干预实施的结果。方法:本研究在一项随机偏好试验中描述了瑜伽干预的治疗保真度,该试验比较了认知行为疗法(CBT)和瑜伽治疗担忧老年人(≥60岁)的担忧、焦虑和睡眠。已建立的评估CBT治疗保真度的方法指导了确保瑜伽干预按预期交付的程序。瑜伽干预包括20分钟,75分钟,面对面,小组,温和的瑜伽课程,每周举行两次。结果:6名女性教练(平均年龄= 64岁)教授了660节瑜伽课,这些课程都被录了下来。这些课程中有10%是按教师分层随机抽取的。瑜伽教练的平均坚持得分为6.84(范围4-8)。平均能力得分一直很高,平均得分为7.24(范围6-8)。26个疗程(38.1%)出现了未包含在治疗方案中的教学内容,并且随着时间的推移而减少。观察到的教师依从性评分与能力评分显著相关。教师的依从性也与较低的参与者出勤率显著相关,但与任何其他过程或结果测量无关。结论:相对于能力分数而言,更大的坚持范围表明,根据协议教授瑜伽课需要不同的技能,而不是在社区教授瑜伽课,这些技能随着反馈而提高。这些结果可能会促进瑜伽研究和实践团体之间的对话。临床试验注册号:: NCT02968238。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of alternative and complementary medicine
Journal of alternative and complementary medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Paradigm, Practice, and Policy Advancing Integrative Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal providing scientific research for the evaluation and integration of complementary and alternative medicine into mainstream medical practice. The Journal delivers original research that directly impacts patient care therapies, protocols, and strategies, ultimately improving the quality of healing. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine coverage includes: -Botanical Medicine -Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine -Other Traditional Medicine Practices -Mind-Body Medicine -Nutrition and Dietary Supplements -Integrative Health / Medicine -Yoga -Ayurveda -Naturopathy -Creative Arts Therapies -Integrative Whole Systems / Whole Practices -Homeopathy -Tai Chi -Qi Gong -Massage Therapy -Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine -Integrative Cost Studies / Comparative Effectiveness -Neurostimulation -Integrative Biophysics
期刊最新文献
Retracted: Music Therapy: A Core Service in Integrative Palliative Care. Yoga Interventions Used for the Rehabilitation of Stroke, Parkinson's Disease, and Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Review of Clinical Research. Effectiveness of Inhaled Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Systematic Review. Can Tai Chi Improve Cognitive Function? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Naturopathic Management of Urinary Tract Infections: A Retrospective Chart Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1