{"title":"Postural Changes on Heart Rate Variability among Older Population: A Preliminary Study.","authors":"Warawoot Chuangchai, Wiraporn Pothisiri","doi":"10.1155/2021/6611479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate an association between body postures and autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses through analysis of short-term heart rate variability (HRV) data obtained through electrocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty older individuals were recruited to form the sample. HRV measurements were taken in three positions-sitting, supine, and standing-and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results demonstrated statistically significant differences in the HRV parameters used to examine the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), specifically in the measurements obtained from the sitting position and the supine position (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for PNS and <i>P</i> = 0.011 for SNS). The differences in these parameters were, however, negligible between the sitting and the standing positions. Moreover, the ANS responses obtained in the sitting position were strongly and positively correlated with those in the standing position (<i>r</i> = 0.854 for PNS and <i>r</i> = 0.794 for SNS). These results suggested that the PNS and SNS parameters obtained while sitting were likely to be affected by orthostatic hypotension in much the same way as those in the standing position, as compared to the supine position.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As such, sitting may not be the best position for older individuals in the assessment of their autonomic responses, whereas the supine position is recommended as the baseline posture in the old-age population. These findings are useful for future research in clinical settings that require accuracy in the ANS responses as determined by the HRV measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":39066,"journal":{"name":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","volume":"2021 ","pages":"6611479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6611479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate an association between body postures and autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses through analysis of short-term heart rate variability (HRV) data obtained through electrocardiography.
Methods: Forty older individuals were recruited to form the sample. HRV measurements were taken in three positions-sitting, supine, and standing-and compared.
Results: Results demonstrated statistically significant differences in the HRV parameters used to examine the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), specifically in the measurements obtained from the sitting position and the supine position (P < 0.001 for PNS and P = 0.011 for SNS). The differences in these parameters were, however, negligible between the sitting and the standing positions. Moreover, the ANS responses obtained in the sitting position were strongly and positively correlated with those in the standing position (r = 0.854 for PNS and r = 0.794 for SNS). These results suggested that the PNS and SNS parameters obtained while sitting were likely to be affected by orthostatic hypotension in much the same way as those in the standing position, as compared to the supine position.
Conclusions: As such, sitting may not be the best position for older individuals in the assessment of their autonomic responses, whereas the supine position is recommended as the baseline posture in the old-age population. These findings are useful for future research in clinical settings that require accuracy in the ANS responses as determined by the HRV measurements.
目的:本研究旨在通过分析心电图获得的短期心率变异性数据,研究身体姿势与自律神经系统(ANS)反应之间的关联:本研究旨在通过分析心电图获得的短期心率变异性(HRV)数据,研究身体姿势与自律神经系统(ANS)反应之间的关联:方法:招募 40 名老年人作为样本。在坐姿、仰卧和站立三种姿势下测量心率变异并进行比较:结果表明,用于检查副交感神经系统(PNS)和交感神经系统(SNS)的心率变异参数在统计学上存在显著差异,特别是在坐姿和仰卧姿势下获得的测量值中(SNS 的 P P = 0.011)。不过,这些参数在坐姿和站姿之间的差异可以忽略不计。此外,坐位获得的自律神经系统反应与站立位获得的自律神经系统反应呈强烈的正相关(PNS 的 r = 0.854,SNS 的 r = 0.794)。这些结果表明,与仰卧位相比,坐位时获得的 PNS 和 SNS 参数受正压性低血压的影响可能与站立位时相同:因此,在评估老年人的自律神经反应时,坐姿可能不是最佳姿势,而建议将仰卧姿势作为老年人群的基准姿势。这些发现对未来的临床研究很有帮助,因为临床研究需要通过心率变异测量来确定自律神经系统反应的准确性。