Postural Changes on Heart Rate Variability among Older Population: A Preliminary Study.

Q2 Medicine Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Pub Date : 2021-02-27 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6611479
Warawoot Chuangchai, Wiraporn Pothisiri
{"title":"Postural Changes on Heart Rate Variability among Older Population: A Preliminary Study.","authors":"Warawoot Chuangchai, Wiraporn Pothisiri","doi":"10.1155/2021/6611479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate an association between body postures and autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses through analysis of short-term heart rate variability (HRV) data obtained through electrocardiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty older individuals were recruited to form the sample. HRV measurements were taken in three positions-sitting, supine, and standing-and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results demonstrated statistically significant differences in the HRV parameters used to examine the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), specifically in the measurements obtained from the sitting position and the supine position (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for PNS and <i>P</i> = 0.011 for SNS). The differences in these parameters were, however, negligible between the sitting and the standing positions. Moreover, the ANS responses obtained in the sitting position were strongly and positively correlated with those in the standing position (<i>r</i> = 0.854 for PNS and <i>r</i> = 0.794 for SNS). These results suggested that the PNS and SNS parameters obtained while sitting were likely to be affected by orthostatic hypotension in much the same way as those in the standing position, as compared to the supine position.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As such, sitting may not be the best position for older individuals in the assessment of their autonomic responses, whereas the supine position is recommended as the baseline posture in the old-age population. These findings are useful for future research in clinical settings that require accuracy in the ANS responses as determined by the HRV measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":39066,"journal":{"name":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","volume":"2021 ","pages":"6611479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7937484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6611479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate an association between body postures and autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses through analysis of short-term heart rate variability (HRV) data obtained through electrocardiography.

Methods: Forty older individuals were recruited to form the sample. HRV measurements were taken in three positions-sitting, supine, and standing-and compared.

Results: Results demonstrated statistically significant differences in the HRV parameters used to examine the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), specifically in the measurements obtained from the sitting position and the supine position (P < 0.001 for PNS and P = 0.011 for SNS). The differences in these parameters were, however, negligible between the sitting and the standing positions. Moreover, the ANS responses obtained in the sitting position were strongly and positively correlated with those in the standing position (r = 0.854 for PNS and r = 0.794 for SNS). These results suggested that the PNS and SNS parameters obtained while sitting were likely to be affected by orthostatic hypotension in much the same way as those in the standing position, as compared to the supine position.

Conclusions: As such, sitting may not be the best position for older individuals in the assessment of their autonomic responses, whereas the supine position is recommended as the baseline posture in the old-age population. These findings are useful for future research in clinical settings that require accuracy in the ANS responses as determined by the HRV measurements.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姿势变化对老年人心率变异性的影响:初步研究
目的:本研究旨在通过分析心电图获得的短期心率变异性数据,研究身体姿势与自律神经系统(ANS)反应之间的关联:本研究旨在通过分析心电图获得的短期心率变异性(HRV)数据,研究身体姿势与自律神经系统(ANS)反应之间的关联:方法:招募 40 名老年人作为样本。在坐姿、仰卧和站立三种姿势下测量心率变异并进行比较:结果表明,用于检查副交感神经系统(PNS)和交感神经系统(SNS)的心率变异参数在统计学上存在显著差异,特别是在坐姿和仰卧姿势下获得的测量值中(SNS 的 P P = 0.011)。不过,这些参数在坐姿和站姿之间的差异可以忽略不计。此外,坐位获得的自律神经系统反应与站立位获得的自律神经系统反应呈强烈的正相关(PNS 的 r = 0.854,SNS 的 r = 0.794)。这些结果表明,与仰卧位相比,坐位时获得的 PNS 和 SNS 参数受正压性低血压的影响可能与站立位时相同:因此,在评估老年人的自律神经反应时,坐姿可能不是最佳姿势,而建议将仰卧姿势作为老年人群的基准姿势。这些发现对未来的临床研究很有帮助,因为临床研究需要通过心率变异测量来确定自律神经系统反应的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Glycemic Control in Older Adults in a Medical Center in Peru. Validation of the Retirement Resources Inventory in Persian: Assessing Psychometric Properties among Iranian Retirees. Physical Exercise for Healthy Older Adults and Those with Frailty: What Exercise Is Best and Is There a Difference? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Functional Aging: Integrating Functionality to a Multidimensional Assessment of Healthy Aging. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Impairment in Intrinsic Capacity among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Observational Study from South India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1