Assessment Of Ratio Of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate To Vital Capacity For Identifying Pulmonary Fibrosis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical and Investigative Medicine Pub Date : 2021-03-21 DOI:10.25011/cim.v44i1.35976
Stacey D Lok, Donald W Cockcroft, Alexander Simidchiev
{"title":"Assessment Of Ratio Of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate To Vital Capacity For Identifying Pulmonary Fibrosis.","authors":"Stacey D Lok,&nbsp;Donald W Cockcroft,&nbsp;Alexander Simidchiev","doi":"10.25011/cim.v44i1.35976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is associated with reduction in vital capacity (VC) and increase in expiratory flow rates, including peak expiratory flow (PEF). Full pulmonary function testing and computed tomography chest scans are limited resources in some geographic areas and a simple and sensitive screening test would be of value. We hypothesized that increase in the ratio of % predicted PEF over % predicted VC (%PEF/%VC), from spirometry alone might be sensitive to screen for pulmonary fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The %PEF/%VC from 1,000 consecutive spirometric flow volume curves was nearly normally distributed: 7.5% (approximately 1.5 standard deviations) had a ratio ≥ 1.4. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of this cut point for a diagnosis of PF in a retrospective chart review of 391 patients with good quality spirometry and respirologists' confirmed diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 391 patients analyzed, 98 had PF, 79 were normal, 70 had a combined obstructive and restrictive processes, 57 had obstructive lung disease, 61 had extra-parenchymal restriction and 26 had non-fibrotic interstitial lung disease. A %PEF/%VC ≥ 1.4 was only 54.1% sensitive in predicting PF, however it had a specificity of 94.9%. There was a 95.1% specificity for ruling in intra-parenchymal opposed to extra-parenchymal restriction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A %PEF/%VC ≥ 1.4 was not sensitive enough to screen for PF but did demonstrate high specificity and thus may be helpful in identifying intraparenchymal restriction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50683,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v44i1.35976","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is associated with reduction in vital capacity (VC) and increase in expiratory flow rates, including peak expiratory flow (PEF). Full pulmonary function testing and computed tomography chest scans are limited resources in some geographic areas and a simple and sensitive screening test would be of value. We hypothesized that increase in the ratio of % predicted PEF over % predicted VC (%PEF/%VC), from spirometry alone might be sensitive to screen for pulmonary fibrosis.

Methods: The %PEF/%VC from 1,000 consecutive spirometric flow volume curves was nearly normally distributed: 7.5% (approximately 1.5 standard deviations) had a ratio ≥ 1.4. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of this cut point for a diagnosis of PF in a retrospective chart review of 391 patients with good quality spirometry and respirologists' confirmed diagnoses.

Results: Of the 391 patients analyzed, 98 had PF, 79 were normal, 70 had a combined obstructive and restrictive processes, 57 had obstructive lung disease, 61 had extra-parenchymal restriction and 26 had non-fibrotic interstitial lung disease. A %PEF/%VC ≥ 1.4 was only 54.1% sensitive in predicting PF, however it had a specificity of 94.9%. There was a 95.1% specificity for ruling in intra-parenchymal opposed to extra-parenchymal restriction.

Conclusion: A %PEF/%VC ≥ 1.4 was not sensitive enough to screen for PF but did demonstrate high specificity and thus may be helpful in identifying intraparenchymal restriction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼气峰值流速与肺活量之比对肺纤维化鉴别的评估。
背景:肺纤维化(PF)与肺活量(VC)降低和呼气流量(包括呼气峰值流量(PEF))增加有关。在某些地区,全肺功能测试和胸部计算机断层扫描资源有限,简单而敏感的筛查测试将是有价值的。我们假设仅从肺活量测定中预测PEF的百分比比预测VC的百分比(%PEF/%VC)的增加可能对肺纤维化筛查敏感。方法:1000条连续肺活量测定曲线的%PEF/%VC接近正态分布:7.5%(约1.5标准差)的比值≥1.4。我们通过对391例患者的回顾性图表回顾,评估了该切点诊断PF的敏感性和特异性,这些患者具有高质量的肺活量测定和呼吸科医生确诊的诊断。结果:391例患者中,PF 98例,正常79例,阻塞性和限制性合并70例,阻塞性肺疾病57例,肺实质外受限61例,非纤维化间质性肺疾病26例。%PEF/%VC≥1.4对PF的敏感性仅为54.1%,特异性为94.9%。判断实质内限制与实质外限制的特异性为95.1%。结论:%PEF/%VC≥1.4不足以筛查PF,但具有较高的特异性,因此可能有助于识别肺实质内限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Investigative Medicine
Clinical and Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Investigative Medicine (CIM), publishes original work in the field of Clinical Investigation. Original work includes clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical reports. Reviews include information for Continuing Medical Education (CME), narrative review articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Global Trends and Frontier in Research on Pancreatic Alpha Cells: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2013 to 2023. Recommendations for Recovery of the COVID-19 Pandemic-related Diagnostic, Screening, and Procedure Backlog in Ontario: A Survey of Healthcare Leaders. Spring 2024: Clinician Investigator Trainee Association of Canada (CITAC). Training Outcomes and Satisfaction in Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc Programs: Findings from a National Survey. A Discussion with Dr. Natasha Kekre, Hematologist and Clinician Scientist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1