Systematic review of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologia Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.003
M. Alonso-Moreno, M. Ladrón-Guevara, P. Ciudad-Gutiérrez
{"title":"Systematic review of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis","authors":"M. Alonso-Moreno,&nbsp;M. Ladrón-Guevara,&nbsp;P. Ciudad-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This article analyses the presence of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We performed a systematic review of controlled clinical trials of 4 monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis (natalizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab). We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for articles published in English before March 2020. The study was conducted in accordance with the relevant international recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search identified 89 articles, 55 of which met the inclusion criteria. Of all patients included in these trials, 64.6% were women. The lead authors of 10 of the studies were women. Fifteen of the 55 studies included a sex-based analysis of the primary endpoint. Only 8 articles discussed the results separately for men and for women.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The clinical trials of these 4 monoclonal antibodies present a significant gender bias. In most cases, the primary and secondary endpoints are not analyzed according to patient sex, despite the fact that international recommendations include this as a minimum requirement for ensuring scientific validity and obtaining appropriate results for extrapolation to the wider population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19300,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"38 9","pages":"Pages 695-706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485321000086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

This article analyses the presence of gender bias in clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis.

Material and methods

We performed a systematic review of controlled clinical trials of 4 monoclonal antibodies used to treat multiple sclerosis (natalizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab). We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for articles published in English before March 2020. The study was conducted in accordance with the relevant international recommendations.

Results

The search identified 89 articles, 55 of which met the inclusion criteria. Of all patients included in these trials, 64.6% were women. The lead authors of 10 of the studies were women. Fifteen of the 55 studies included a sex-based analysis of the primary endpoint. Only 8 articles discussed the results separately for men and for women.

Conclusions

The clinical trials of these 4 monoclonal antibodies present a significant gender bias. In most cases, the primary and secondary endpoints are not analyzed according to patient sex, despite the fact that international recommendations include this as a minimum requirement for ensuring scientific validity and obtaining appropriate results for extrapolation to the wider population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单克隆抗体治疗多发性硬化症临床试验中性别偏倚的系统评价
本文分析了用于治疗多发性硬化症的单克隆抗体临床试验中存在的性别偏见。材料和方法我们对用于治疗多发性硬化症的4种单克隆抗体(natalizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab和ocrelizumab)的对照临床试验进行了系统回顾。我们在PubMed/MEDLINE数据库中检索了2020年3月之前发表的英文文章。这项研究是按照有关的国际建议进行的。结果共检索到89篇文献,其中55篇符合纳入标准。在这些试验的所有患者中,64.6%是女性。其中10项研究的主要作者是女性。55项研究中有15项包括基于性别的主要终点分析。只有8篇文章分别讨论了男性和女性的结果。结论4种单克隆抗体在临床试验中存在明显的性别偏倚。在大多数情况下,主要和次要终点没有根据患者的性别进行分析,尽管国际建议将其作为确保科学有效性和获得适当结果以外推到更广泛人群的最低要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia
Neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
135
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Neurología es la revista oficial de la Sociedad Española de Neurología y publica, desde 1986 contribuciones científicas en el campo de la neurología clínica y experimental. Los contenidos de Neurología abarcan desde la neuroepidemiología, la clínica neurológica, la gestión y asistencia neurológica y la terapéutica, a la investigación básica en neurociencias aplicada a la neurología. Las áreas temáticas de la revistas incluyen la neurologia infantil, la neuropsicología, la neurorehabilitación y la neurogeriatría. Los artículos publicados en Neurología siguen un proceso de revisión por doble ciego a fin de que los trabajos sean seleccionados atendiendo a su calidad, originalidad e interés y así estén sometidos a un proceso de mejora. El formato de artículos incluye Editoriales, Originales, Revisiones y Cartas al Editor, Neurología es el vehículo de información científica de reconocida calidad en profesionales interesados en la neurología que utilizan el español, como demuestra su inclusión en los más prestigiosos y selectivos índices bibliográficos del mundo.
期刊最新文献
Síndrome de trombosis con trombocitopenia asociado a vacunas de adenovirus frente a la COVID-19: Epidemiología y presentación clínica de la serie española Validación de Neuromyotype: un teclado inteligente para la evaluación de pacientes con atrofia muscular espinal 5q Test cognitivos breves como herramienta de decisión en Atención Primaria. Estudio poblacional y de validación Estudio CORCOBIA: determinación de puntos de corte de biomarcadores de enfermedad de Alzheimer en LCR en una cohorte clínica Insomnio fatal esporádico: fenotipo PSP-like rápidamente progresivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1