Syringe with Nasal Applicator versus Syringe Alone for Nasal Irrigation in Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Matched-Pair Randomized Controlled Trial.

Biomedicine Hub Pub Date : 2021-01-27 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000512664
Patorn Piromchai, Chayakorn Phannikul, Sanguansak Thanaviratananich
{"title":"Syringe with Nasal Applicator versus Syringe Alone for Nasal Irrigation in Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Matched-Pair Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Patorn Piromchai,&nbsp;Chayakorn Phannikul,&nbsp;Sanguansak Thanaviratananich","doi":"10.1159/000512664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Nasal saline irrigation is a common procedure to relieve nasal symptoms in upper respiratory tract diseases. There is no consensus on the recommended nasal saline delivery devices. The objectives of this study were to evaluate efficacy, satisfaction, adherence, and adverse effects in patients with acute upper respiratory tract diseases using a syringe with a nasal applicator for nasal irrigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute nasopharyngitis, acute rhinitis, or acute rhinosinusitis were randomly allocated to use either (1) a syringe with a nasal applicator or (2) a syringe alone to irrigate one nostril. After the patients had completed irrigation with the allocated device in one nostril, they were instructed to perform nasal irrigation using the other device in the other nostril. All patients were instructed to use a syringe with a nasal applicator at home. The efficacy, satisfaction scores, adherence, and adverse effects were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 33.95 years (18-59 years). The mean duration of symptoms was 4.80 days. None of the enrolled patients regularly performed nasal irrigation. Forty-two had acute nasopharyngitis, 10 had acute rhinitis, and 12 had acute rhinosinusitis. At baseline, the mean overall efficacy score for the syringe with a nasal applicator was 8.17 ± 1.43, and that for the syringe alone was 5.95 ± 2.02 (MD 2.23, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI 1.75-2.70). At 1 week, the syringe with the nasal applicator had significantly higher scores in 3 of 4 domains, including symptom relief, ease of use, and patients' willingness to recommend the device to others, compared to baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05). None of the enrolled patients had epistaxis, retained/dislodged the applicator during irrigation, or experienced an allergic reaction to the applicator after 1 week of nasal irrigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a syringe with an applicator for nasal irrigation yielded high scores in overall efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9075,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine Hub","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000512664","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine Hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000512664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background/aims: Nasal saline irrigation is a common procedure to relieve nasal symptoms in upper respiratory tract diseases. There is no consensus on the recommended nasal saline delivery devices. The objectives of this study were to evaluate efficacy, satisfaction, adherence, and adverse effects in patients with acute upper respiratory tract diseases using a syringe with a nasal applicator for nasal irrigation.

Methods: Patients with acute nasopharyngitis, acute rhinitis, or acute rhinosinusitis were randomly allocated to use either (1) a syringe with a nasal applicator or (2) a syringe alone to irrigate one nostril. After the patients had completed irrigation with the allocated device in one nostril, they were instructed to perform nasal irrigation using the other device in the other nostril. All patients were instructed to use a syringe with a nasal applicator at home. The efficacy, satisfaction scores, adherence, and adverse effects were recorded.

Results: Sixty-four patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 33.95 years (18-59 years). The mean duration of symptoms was 4.80 days. None of the enrolled patients regularly performed nasal irrigation. Forty-two had acute nasopharyngitis, 10 had acute rhinitis, and 12 had acute rhinosinusitis. At baseline, the mean overall efficacy score for the syringe with a nasal applicator was 8.17 ± 1.43, and that for the syringe alone was 5.95 ± 2.02 (MD 2.23, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.75-2.70). At 1 week, the syringe with the nasal applicator had significantly higher scores in 3 of 4 domains, including symptom relief, ease of use, and patients' willingness to recommend the device to others, compared to baseline (p < 0.05). None of the enrolled patients had epistaxis, retained/dislodged the applicator during irrigation, or experienced an allergic reaction to the applicator after 1 week of nasal irrigation.

Conclusion: Use of a syringe with an applicator for nasal irrigation yielded high scores in overall efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性鼻窦炎的鼻冲洗:一项配对随机对照试验。
背景/目的:鼻盐水冲洗是缓解上呼吸道疾病患者鼻症状的常用方法。对于推荐的鼻腔生理盐水输送装置尚无共识。本研究的目的是评估急性上呼吸道疾病患者使用带鼻涂抹器的注射器进行鼻冲洗的疗效、满意度、依从性和不良反应。方法:将急性鼻咽炎、急性鼻炎、急性鼻窦炎患者随机分为两组:(1)使用带喷鼻器的注射器或(2)单独使用注射器冲洗一侧鼻孔。在患者用分配的设备在一个鼻孔完成冲洗后,他们被指示在另一个鼻孔使用另一个设备进行鼻腔冲洗。所有患者都被指示在家中使用带鼻涂抹器的注射器。记录疗效、满意度评分、依从性和不良反应。结果:64例患者入组。患者平均年龄33.95岁(18 ~ 59岁)。平均症状持续时间为4.80天。所有入组患者均未定期进行鼻腔冲洗。急性鼻咽炎42例,急性鼻炎10例,急性鼻窦炎12例。基线时,带鼻涂器的注射器的平均总疗效评分为8.17±1.43,单独使用注射器的平均总疗效评分为5.95±2.02 (MD为2.23,p < 0.001, 95% CI为1.75-2.70)。在第1周时,与基线相比,带鼻涂抹器的注射器在症状缓解、易用性和患者向他人推荐该设备的意愿等4个领域中的3个领域得分显著高于基线(p < 0.05)。所有入组患者均未发生鼻出血,在冲洗过程中未保留/移出涂抹器,或在鼻冲洗1周后对涂抹器发生过敏反应。结论:使用注射器加涂抹器进行鼻腔冲洗的综合疗效评分较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Folate Receptor Beta Signaling in the Regulation of Macrophage Antimicrobial Immune Response: A Scoping Review Estimation of the Variance Components in TP53 mRNA Expression in the Rat Lens after in vivo Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation B. Physical Activity among Primary Health Care Physicians and Its Impact on Counseling Practices. A Potential Off-Target Effect of the Wnt/β-Catenin Inhibitor KYA1797K: PD-L1 Binding and Checkpoint Inhibition. Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1