Thinking Outside the Silos: Information Sharing in Medical-Legal Partnerships.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q3 LAW Journal of Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1080/01947648.2020.1854135
Jessica Mantel, Leah Fowler
{"title":"Thinking Outside the Silos: Information Sharing in Medical-Legal Partnerships.","authors":"Jessica Mantel,&nbsp;Leah Fowler","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2020.1854135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) allow providers to address patients' health-harming legal needs through partnerships with lawyers. MLPs are most successful in addressing the complex needs of vulnerable populations when clinicians, social workers, and other care team members regularly communicate with the MLP lawyer. Privacy laws and professional rules of conduct governing patient/client confidentiality, however, potentially hinder this exchange of patient-client information. MLP attorneys may be reluctant to share relevant information about a client with the medical partner for fear that doing so would breach client confidentiality or result in an ill-advised waiver of attorney-client privilege. Similarly, privacy concerns may lead providers to limit MLP attorneys' access to patients' medical information.Drawing on the real-world experiences of MLP professionals, this article explores whether legal and ethical obligations impede the sharing of patient-client information between MLPs' medical and legal partners. Our research indicates that at present patient/client confidentiality rules generally do not pose a significant barrier to doing so. However, current legal and professional standards may frustrate emerging advanced care coordination models that pair MLPs with care teams that comprehensively address a broad range of social, economic, and behavioral health needs. We therefore recommend continued monitoring and discussion of the issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":44014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01947648.2020.1854135","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1854135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) allow providers to address patients' health-harming legal needs through partnerships with lawyers. MLPs are most successful in addressing the complex needs of vulnerable populations when clinicians, social workers, and other care team members regularly communicate with the MLP lawyer. Privacy laws and professional rules of conduct governing patient/client confidentiality, however, potentially hinder this exchange of patient-client information. MLP attorneys may be reluctant to share relevant information about a client with the medical partner for fear that doing so would breach client confidentiality or result in an ill-advised waiver of attorney-client privilege. Similarly, privacy concerns may lead providers to limit MLP attorneys' access to patients' medical information.Drawing on the real-world experiences of MLP professionals, this article explores whether legal and ethical obligations impede the sharing of patient-client information between MLPs' medical and legal partners. Our research indicates that at present patient/client confidentiality rules generally do not pose a significant barrier to doing so. However, current legal and professional standards may frustrate emerging advanced care coordination models that pair MLPs with care teams that comprehensively address a broad range of social, economic, and behavioral health needs. We therefore recommend continued monitoring and discussion of the issue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跳出竖井思考:医疗-法律伙伴关系中的信息共享。
医疗-法律伙伴关系(mlp)允许提供者通过与律师的伙伴关系来解决患者危害健康的法律需求。当临床医生、社会工作者和其他护理团队成员定期与MLP律师沟通时,MLP在解决弱势群体的复杂需求方面最成功。然而,有关患者/客户保密的隐私法和专业行为规则可能会阻碍这种患者-客户信息的交换。MLP律师可能不愿意与医疗合作伙伴分享客户的相关信息,因为担心这样做会违反客户保密协议或导致不明智的放弃律师-客户特权。同样,隐私问题可能导致供应商限制MLP律师访问患者的医疗信息。根据MLP专业人员的实际经验,本文探讨了法律和道德义务是否会阻碍MLP的医疗和法律合作伙伴之间共享患者-客户信息。我们的研究表明,目前患者/客户保密规则通常不会对这样做构成重大障碍。然而,当前的法律和专业标准可能会阻碍新兴的先进护理协调模式,这种模式将mlp与护理团队结合起来,全面解决广泛的社会、经济和行为健康需求。因此,我们建议继续监测和讨论这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Medicine is the official quarterly publication of the American College of Legal Medicine (ACLM). Incorporated in 1960, the ACLM has among its objectives the fostering and encouragement of research and study in the field of legal medicine. The Journal of Legal Medicine is internationally circulated and includes articles and commentaries on topics of interest in legal medicine, health law and policy, professional liability, hospital law, food and drug law, medical legal research and education, the history of legal medicine, and a broad range of other related topics. Book review essays, featuring leading contributions to the field, are included in each issue.
期刊最新文献
The Problem with Using Medical Boards to Regulate Misinformation 2022-2023 Southern Illinois University National Health Law Moot Court Competition. 2022-2023 Southern Illinois University National Health Law Moot Court Competition: Winning Brief. Fitness to Drive: It is Time for Evidence-Based Consensus and Italian Guidelines for Medical Driving Assessment. Who Decides? State Bans on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors in Tension with Parental Rights and Equal Protection Under the Law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1