Palliative treatment of Kaposi sarcoma with radiotherapy: a single center experience.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-22 DOI:10.3857/roj.2020.00885
Gonca Altinisik Inan, Ipek Pinar Aral, Suheyla Aytac Arslan, Yilmaz Tezcan
{"title":"Palliative treatment of Kaposi sarcoma with radiotherapy: a single center experience.","authors":"Gonca Altinisik Inan,&nbsp;Ipek Pinar Aral,&nbsp;Suheyla Aytac Arslan,&nbsp;Yilmaz Tezcan","doi":"10.3857/roj.2020.00885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment responses of Kaposi sarcoma patients treated with radiotherapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The data of 18 patients (40 different regions) who were treated for Kaposi sarcoma in OOOO between March 23, 2010 to February 13, 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. The primary endpoint of the study was the clinical-subjective response after RT, and the secondary endpoint was the visual response assessment after RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In evaluating the patients' reported response of the lesions: 25 (62.5%) of complete response (CR), 12 (30%) of partial response (PR), and stable response was seen in 3 patients (7.5%). Patient reported response after RT was significantly higher in male sex (p = 0.002; odds ratio [OR] = 13.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-70.0). Physician reported response rates were available for 28 lesions and CR was detected in 12 lesions (30%); PR was observed in 16 (40%). The relationship between physician reported outcome and RT techniques (electron, bolus, or water bolus) is close to the limit of statically significance (p = 0.052). Fewer lesions disappeared in patients with photon preference than electrons (p = 0.036; OR = 0.093; 95% CI, 0.009-0.950). Patients' reported complete response rates were significantly higher in the 20 Gy per 5 fractions treatment arm (p = 0.042; OR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RT is an effective local treatment with high response rates in the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma. The subjective-clinical response rate was higher in male sex and the visual response was higher in the 20 Gy per 5 fractions arm. Additional studies are needed to standardize RT dose and techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/70/roj-2020-00885.PMC8024179.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment responses of Kaposi sarcoma patients treated with radiotherapy (RT).

Materials and methods: The data of 18 patients (40 different regions) who were treated for Kaposi sarcoma in OOOO between March 23, 2010 to February 13, 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. The primary endpoint of the study was the clinical-subjective response after RT, and the secondary endpoint was the visual response assessment after RT.

Results: In evaluating the patients' reported response of the lesions: 25 (62.5%) of complete response (CR), 12 (30%) of partial response (PR), and stable response was seen in 3 patients (7.5%). Patient reported response after RT was significantly higher in male sex (p = 0.002; odds ratio [OR] = 13.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-70.0). Physician reported response rates were available for 28 lesions and CR was detected in 12 lesions (30%); PR was observed in 16 (40%). The relationship between physician reported outcome and RT techniques (electron, bolus, or water bolus) is close to the limit of statically significance (p = 0.052). Fewer lesions disappeared in patients with photon preference than electrons (p = 0.036; OR = 0.093; 95% CI, 0.009-0.950). Patients' reported complete response rates were significantly higher in the 20 Gy per 5 fractions treatment arm (p = 0.042; OR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7).

Conclusion: RT is an effective local treatment with high response rates in the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma. The subjective-clinical response rate was higher in male sex and the visual response was higher in the 20 Gy per 5 fractions arm. Additional studies are needed to standardize RT dose and techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡波西肉瘤放疗的姑息治疗:单中心经验。
目的:本研究的目的是评估卡波西肉瘤患者放疗(RT)的治疗反应。材料与方法:回顾性分析2010年3月23日至2018年2月13日在OOOO接受卡波西肉瘤治疗的18例患者(40个不同地区)的资料。研究的主要终点是放疗后的临床-主观反应,次要终点是放疗后的视觉反应评估。结果:在评估患者报告的病变反应中:完全缓解(CR) 25例(62.5%),部分缓解(PR) 12例(30%),稳定缓解3例(7.5%)。男性患者报告的RT后反应显著高于男性(p = 0.002;优势比[OR] = 13.8, 95%可信区间[CI], 2.7-70.0)。医生报告的缓解率可用于28个病变,12个病变(30%)检测到CR;16例(40%)出现PR。医生报告的结果与放疗技术(电子、丸剂或水丸剂)之间的关系接近统计学意义的极限(p = 0.052)。光子偏好组病变消失率低于电子偏好组(p = 0.036;Or = 0.093;95% ci, 0.009-0.950)。患者报告的完全缓解率在每5次20 Gy的治疗组中显著更高(p = 0.042;Or = 1.75;95% ci, 1.1-2.7)。结论:放疗是治疗卡波济肉瘤有效的局部治疗方法,有效率高。主观-临床反应率在男性中较高,视觉反应在20gy / 5组中较高。需要进一步的研究来规范放射治疗的剂量和技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Implementing high-dose rate surface mould brachytherapy for carcinoma of eyelid: a practical approach and weekly review The effects of high-dose radiation therapy on bone: a scoping review Validation of Combs prognostic scoring system in Indian recurrent glioma patients treated with re-radiation Long-term toxicities after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with or without total body irradiation: a population-based study in Korea Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1