Adult Pleomorphic Rhabdomyosarcomas: Assessing Outcomes Associated with Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Use in the National Cancer Database.

Q2 Medicine Sarcoma Pub Date : 2021-03-13 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/9712070
Vishruth K Reddy, Varsha Jain, Robert J Wilson Ii, Lee P Hartner, Mark Diamond, Ronnie A Sebro, Kristy L Weber, Robert G Maki, Jacob E Shabason
{"title":"Adult Pleomorphic Rhabdomyosarcomas: Assessing Outcomes Associated with Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Use in the National Cancer Database.","authors":"Vishruth K Reddy,&nbsp;Varsha Jain,&nbsp;Robert J Wilson Ii,&nbsp;Lee P Hartner,&nbsp;Mark Diamond,&nbsp;Ronnie A Sebro,&nbsp;Kristy L Weber,&nbsp;Robert G Maki,&nbsp;Jacob E Shabason","doi":"10.1155/2021/9712070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Practice patterns for treatment of localized adult pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) remain quite variable given its rarity. Current national guidelines recommend management similar to that of other high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS), which include surgery with perioperative radiation (RT) with or without chemotherapy. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we assessed practice patterns and overall outcomes of patients with localized PRMS. <i>Patients and Methods</i>. Patients with stage II/III PRMS treated with surgical resection from 2004 to 2015 were identified from the NCDB. Predictors of RT and chemotherapy use were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The association of radiation and chemotherapy status on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 243 total patients, RT and chemotherapy were not uniformly utilized, with 44% receiving chemotherapy and in those who did not undergo amputation 62% receiving RT. In those who did not undergo amputation, RT was associated with improved survival on both univariate (HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.73, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62, <i>P</i> < 0.001), corresponding to greater 5-year overall survival (59% vs. 38%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Chemotherapy was associated with a higher rate of 5-year overall survival (63% vs. 39%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). However, the survival benefit of chemotherapy did not reach statistical significance on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.03, <i>P</i>=0.064). Notable predictors of omission of RT included female gender (OR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.74, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and age ≥ 70 (OR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-1.00, <i>P</i>=0.05). Correspondingly, factors associated with omission of chemotherapy included age ≥70 (OR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.39, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of patients with localized adult PRMS are not receiving RT. Likewise, use of chemotherapy was heterogeneous. Our findings note potential benefits and underutilization of RT, for which further investigation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":21431,"journal":{"name":"Sarcoma","volume":"2021 ","pages":"9712070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sarcoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9712070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Practice patterns for treatment of localized adult pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) remain quite variable given its rarity. Current national guidelines recommend management similar to that of other high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS), which include surgery with perioperative radiation (RT) with or without chemotherapy. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we assessed practice patterns and overall outcomes of patients with localized PRMS. Patients and Methods. Patients with stage II/III PRMS treated with surgical resection from 2004 to 2015 were identified from the NCDB. Predictors of RT and chemotherapy use were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The association of radiation and chemotherapy status on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses.

Results: Of 243 total patients, RT and chemotherapy were not uniformly utilized, with 44% receiving chemotherapy and in those who did not undergo amputation 62% receiving RT. In those who did not undergo amputation, RT was associated with improved survival on both univariate (HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.73, P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62, P < 0.001), corresponding to greater 5-year overall survival (59% vs. 38%, P < 0.001). Chemotherapy was associated with a higher rate of 5-year overall survival (63% vs. 39%, P < 0.001). However, the survival benefit of chemotherapy did not reach statistical significance on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.03, P=0.064). Notable predictors of omission of RT included female gender (OR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.74, P < 0.01) and age ≥ 70 (OR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-1.00, P=0.05). Correspondingly, factors associated with omission of chemotherapy included age ≥70 (OR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.39, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients with localized adult PRMS are not receiving RT. Likewise, use of chemotherapy was heterogeneous. Our findings note potential benefits and underutilization of RT, for which further investigation is warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人多形性横纹肌肉瘤:在国家癌症数据库中评估与放疗和化疗使用相关的结果。
目的:治疗局限性成人多形性横纹肌肉瘤(PRMS)的实践模式由于其罕见性而变化很大。目前的国家指南推荐的治疗方法与其他高级别软组织肉瘤(STS)类似,包括围手术期放疗(RT)手术,伴或不伴化疗。使用国家癌症数据库(NCDB),我们评估了局限性PRMS患者的实践模式和总体结果。患者和方法。2004年至2015年接受手术切除的II/III期PRMS患者从NCDB中确定。使用多变量logistic回归分析评估放疗和化疗使用的预测因素。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险分析评估放疗和化疗状况与总生存期的关系。结果:在243例患者中,放疗和化疗的使用并不统一,44%的患者接受化疗,未截肢的患者62%接受放疗。在未截肢的患者中,放疗与单因素(HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.73, P < 0.001)和多因素分析(HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62, P < 0.001)的生存率改善相关,对应于更高的5年总生存率(59%对38%,P < 0.001)。化疗与更高的5年总生存率相关(63%对39%,P < 0.001)。但多因素分析显示,化疗的生存获益无统计学意义(HR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.03, P=0.064)。遗漏RT的显著预测因素包括女性(OR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.74, P < 0.01)和年龄≥70 (OR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-1.00, P=0.05)。相应的,与遗漏化疗相关的因素包括年龄≥70岁(OR: 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.39, P < 0.001)。结论:相当大比例的局限性成人PRMS患者没有接受放疗。同样,化疗的使用也是异质性的。我们的研究结果指出了放疗的潜在益处和利用不足,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sarcoma
Sarcoma Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Sarcoma is dedicated to publishing papers covering all aspects of connective tissue oncology research. It brings together work from scientists and clinicians carrying out a broad range of research in this field, including the basic sciences, molecular biology and pathology and the clinical sciences of epidemiology, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. High-quality papers concerning the entire range of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in both adults and children, including Kaposi"s sarcoma, are published as well as preclinical and animal studies. This journal provides a central forum for the description of advances in diagnosis, assessment and treatment of this rarely seen, but often mismanaged, group of patients.
期刊最新文献
Oral Etoposide for Relapsed or Refractory Ewing Sarcoma in Adolescent and Adult Patients. Incidence of Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma (UPS) in the United States. Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumors: Clinical Presentation, Molecular Characterization, and Therapeutic Approach of Seven Patients. ATRX and Its Prognostic Significance in Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Factors Influencing the Outcome of Patients with Primary Ewing Sarcoma of the Sacrum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1