[Reduction of social coverage for symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis: a disinvestment initiative in Argentina, 2015-2017].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Salud Colectiva Pub Date : 2021-03-06 DOI:10.18294/sc.2021.3246
Martín A Urtasun, María Noble, Martín Cañás, Julián Bustin, Ricardo C Mastai, Alejandro J Regueiro
{"title":"[Reduction of social coverage for symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis: a disinvestment initiative in Argentina, 2015-2017].","authors":"Martín A Urtasun,&nbsp;María Noble,&nbsp;Martín Cañás,&nbsp;Julián Bustin,&nbsp;Ricardo C Mastai,&nbsp;Alejandro J Regueiro","doi":"10.18294/sc.2021.3246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In April 2016, the National Institute of Social Services for Retirees and Pensioners discontinued its policy of 100% coverage for 159 drugs (the \"social subsidy\"), including symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis (SYSADOAs), due to insufficient evidence of significant clinical benefit. We evaluated the effect of this measure on the use of SYSADOAs as well as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which were unaffected by this policy change. We compared outpatient dispensations of SYSADOAs and NSAIDs from 2015 to 2017, measuring dispensed units, retail price, and out-of-pocket expenses for beneficiaries each month. After the change in coverage, there was a 61.6% total decrease in SYSADOA units dispensed, and a 63.4% decrease in the final sales price to the public, measured in constant values. Dispensation was not reoriented towards NSAIDs, which fell by 6.1%. The incidence of new treatments decreased (from 6.4 to 3.3 treatments per 1,000 beneficiaries per month), as did their continuity. Beneficiaries' out-of-pocket spending on SYSADOAs increased by 75.8% (at constant values). Disinvestment in interventions with questionable therapeutic value is an important tool in working toward the sustainability of health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":44640,"journal":{"name":"Salud Colectiva","volume":"17 ","pages":"e3246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Colectiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2021.3246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In April 2016, the National Institute of Social Services for Retirees and Pensioners discontinued its policy of 100% coverage for 159 drugs (the "social subsidy"), including symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis (SYSADOAs), due to insufficient evidence of significant clinical benefit. We evaluated the effect of this measure on the use of SYSADOAs as well as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which were unaffected by this policy change. We compared outpatient dispensations of SYSADOAs and NSAIDs from 2015 to 2017, measuring dispensed units, retail price, and out-of-pocket expenses for beneficiaries each month. After the change in coverage, there was a 61.6% total decrease in SYSADOA units dispensed, and a 63.4% decrease in the final sales price to the public, measured in constant values. Dispensation was not reoriented towards NSAIDs, which fell by 6.1%. The incidence of new treatments decreased (from 6.4 to 3.3 treatments per 1,000 beneficiaries per month), as did their continuity. Beneficiaries' out-of-pocket spending on SYSADOAs increased by 75.8% (at constant values). Disinvestment in interventions with questionable therapeutic value is an important tool in working toward the sustainability of health systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[降低治疗骨关节炎症状性慢动作药物的社会覆盖率:阿根廷的撤资举措,2015-2017]。
2016年4月,国家退休人员和养老金领取者社会服务研究所停止了对159种药物(“社会补贴”)100%覆盖的政策,其中包括治疗骨关节炎的症状性缓效药物(SYSADOAs),原因是没有足够的证据表明有显著的临床效益。我们评估了该措施对sysadoa和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)使用的影响,这些药物不受该政策变化的影响。我们比较了2015年至2017年sysadoa和nsaid的门诊处方,测量了每个月的处方单位、零售价格和受益人的自付费用。在覆盖范围发生变化后,SYSADOA分配的总数量减少了61.6%,以恒定值衡量,最终向公众销售的价格下降了63.4%。非甾体抗炎药的分配没有重新调整,减少了6.1%。新疗法的发生率下降(从每月每1,000名受益人6.4次治疗降至3.3次治疗),其连续性也下降了。受益人在sysadoa上的自付支出增加了75.8%(按恒定值计算)。对治疗价值存疑的干预措施进行撤资是实现卫生系统可持续性的一个重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Colectiva
Salud Colectiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Salud Colectiva publica análisis y resultados de investigaciones, debates entre diferentes autores, artículos de opinión, conferencias, documentos y reseñas históricas, en español, que problematicen el campo de la Salud Colectiva desde diferentes disciplinas y saberes.
期刊最新文献
[Racial inequality in the production of fresh vegetables and cut flowers in Argentina: an analysis in Greater La Plata]. [Use of psychotropic drugs among Indigenous and Quilombola communities in Brazil]. [Experiences and subjective transformations: suffering and coercion in the use of psychotropic drugs in psychiatric treatment in Chile]. [Racism and mental health in indigenous youth living in the Metropolitan Area of Oaxaca, Mexico]. [Jeremiah Noah Morris and social epidemiology].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1