Changes in quantifiable breathing pattern components predict asthma control: an observational cross-sectional study.

Panagiotis Sakkatos, Anne Bruton, Anna Barney
{"title":"Changes in quantifiable breathing pattern components predict asthma control: an observational cross-sectional study.","authors":"Panagiotis Sakkatos,&nbsp;Anne Bruton,&nbsp;Anna Barney","doi":"10.1186/s40733-021-00071-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breathing pattern disorders are frequently reported in uncontrolled asthma. At present, this is primarily assessed by questionnaires, which are subjective. Objective measures of breathing pattern components may provide additional useful information about asthma control. This study examined whether respiratory timing parameters and thoracoabdominal (TA) motion measures could predict and classify levels of asthma control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred twenty-two asthma patients at STEP 2- STEP 5 GINA asthma medication were enrolled. Asthma control was determined by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ7-item) and patients divided into 'well controlled' or 'uncontrolled' groups. Breathing pattern components (respiratory rate (RR), ratio of inspiration duration to expiration duration (Ti/Te), ratio of ribcage amplitude over abdominal amplitude during expiration phase (RCampe/ABampe), were measured using Structured Light Plethysmography (SLP) in a sitting position for 5-min. Breath-by-breath analysis was performed to extract mean values and within-subject variability (measured by the Coefficient of Variance (CoV%). Binary multiple logistic regression was used to test whether breathing pattern components are predictive of asthma control. A post-hoc analysis determined the discriminant accuracy of any statistically significant predictive model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine out of 122 asthma patients had an ACQ7-item < 0.75 (well-controlled asthma) with the rest being uncontrolled (n = 63). The absolute mean values of breathing pattern components did not predict asthma control (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.09) with only mean RR being a significant predictor (p < 0.01). The CoV% of the examined breathing components did predict asthma control (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.45) with all predictors having significant odds ratios (p < 0.01). The ROC curve showed that cut-off points > 7.40% for the COV% of the RR, > 21.66% for the CoV% of Ti/Te and > 18.78% for the CoV% of RCampe/ABampe indicated uncontrolled asthma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The within-subject variability of timing parameters and TA motion can be used to predict asthma control. Higher breathing pattern variability was associated with uncontrolled asthma suggesting that irregular resting breathing can be an indicator of poor asthma control.</p>","PeriodicalId":8572,"journal":{"name":"Asthma research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40733-021-00071-3","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asthma research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40733-021-00071-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breathing pattern disorders are frequently reported in uncontrolled asthma. At present, this is primarily assessed by questionnaires, which are subjective. Objective measures of breathing pattern components may provide additional useful information about asthma control. This study examined whether respiratory timing parameters and thoracoabdominal (TA) motion measures could predict and classify levels of asthma control.

Methods: One hundred twenty-two asthma patients at STEP 2- STEP 5 GINA asthma medication were enrolled. Asthma control was determined by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ7-item) and patients divided into 'well controlled' or 'uncontrolled' groups. Breathing pattern components (respiratory rate (RR), ratio of inspiration duration to expiration duration (Ti/Te), ratio of ribcage amplitude over abdominal amplitude during expiration phase (RCampe/ABampe), were measured using Structured Light Plethysmography (SLP) in a sitting position for 5-min. Breath-by-breath analysis was performed to extract mean values and within-subject variability (measured by the Coefficient of Variance (CoV%). Binary multiple logistic regression was used to test whether breathing pattern components are predictive of asthma control. A post-hoc analysis determined the discriminant accuracy of any statistically significant predictive model.

Results: Fifty-nine out of 122 asthma patients had an ACQ7-item < 0.75 (well-controlled asthma) with the rest being uncontrolled (n = 63). The absolute mean values of breathing pattern components did not predict asthma control (R2 = 0.09) with only mean RR being a significant predictor (p < 0.01). The CoV% of the examined breathing components did predict asthma control (R2 = 0.45) with all predictors having significant odds ratios (p < 0.01). The ROC curve showed that cut-off points > 7.40% for the COV% of the RR, > 21.66% for the CoV% of Ti/Te and > 18.78% for the CoV% of RCampe/ABampe indicated uncontrolled asthma.

Conclusion: The within-subject variability of timing parameters and TA motion can be used to predict asthma control. Higher breathing pattern variability was associated with uncontrolled asthma suggesting that irregular resting breathing can be an indicator of poor asthma control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可量化呼吸模式成分的变化预测哮喘控制:一项观察性横断面研究。
背景:未控制的哮喘经常报道呼吸模式障碍。目前,这主要是通过问卷调查来评估的,这是主观的。呼吸模式成分的客观测量可以提供有关哮喘控制的额外有用信息。本研究探讨呼吸时间参数和胸腹(TA)运动测量是否可以预测和分类哮喘控制水平。方法:纳入第2- 5步GINA哮喘用药组122例哮喘患者。通过哮喘控制问卷(ACQ7-item)确定哮喘控制情况,并将患者分为“控制良好”组和“未控制”组。呼吸模式成分(呼吸频率(RR)、吸气持续时间与呼气持续时间之比(Ti/Te)、呼气阶段胸腔振幅与腹部振幅之比(RCampe/ABampe))在坐姿5分钟时使用结构光容积描记仪(SLP)进行测量。进行逐呼吸分析以提取平均值和受试者内变异性(通过方差系数(CoV%)测量)。采用二元多元逻辑回归检验呼吸方式成分是否预测哮喘控制。事后分析确定了任何统计上显著的预测模型的判别准确性。结果:122例哮喘患者中有59例有acq7 -项目2 = 0.09),只有平均RR是显著预测因子(p 2 = 0.45),所有预测因子的比值比均显著(RR的COV% p 7.40%, Ti/Te的COV% > 21.66%, RCampe/ABampe的COV% > 18.78%)表明哮喘未控制。结论:时间参数和TA运动的受试者内部变异性可用于预测哮喘控制。较高的呼吸模式可变性与未控制的哮喘有关,这表明不规则的静息呼吸可能是哮喘控制不良的一个指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Asthma Research and Practice is the official publication of Interasma and publishes cutting edge basic, clinical and translational research in addition to hot topic reviews and debate articles relevant to asthma and related disorders (such as rhinitis, COPD overlapping syndrome, sinusitis). The journal has a specialized section which focusses on pediatric asthma research. Asthma Research and Practice aims to serve as an international platform for the dissemination of research of interest to pulmonologists, allergologists, primary care physicians and family doctors, ENTs and other health care providers interested in asthma, its mechanisms and comorbidities.
期刊最新文献
Psychological distress and associated factors among asthmatic patients in Southern, Ethiopia, 2021. Retrospective assessment of a collaborative digital asthma program for Medicaid-enrolled children in southwest Detroit: reductions in short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication use. Nonadherence to antiasthmatic medications and its predictors among asthmatic patients in public hospitals of Bahir Dar City, North West Ethiopia: using ASK-12 tool. The hen and the egg question in atopic dermatitis: allergy or eczema comes first. Medication regimen complexity and its impact on medication adherence and asthma control among patients with asthma in Ethiopian referral hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1