Age Categories Differences in Subjective Quality of Life of Women with Physical Disabilities.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Zdravstveno Varstvo Pub Date : 2021-03-18 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI:10.2478/sjph-2021-0018
Dagmar Nemček, Patrícia Shtin Baňárová, Petra Kurková
{"title":"Age Categories Differences in Subjective Quality of Life of Women with Physical Disabilities.","authors":"Dagmar Nemček,&nbsp;Patrícia Shtin Baňárová,&nbsp;Petra Kurková","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2021-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to analyse and compare the subjective quality of life (S-QoL) of women with physical disabilities (PDs) through satisfaction with the quality of life domains and the overall quality of life assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample comprised of women with PDs (n=137), divided into 4 age categories: 19-29 yrs. (n=53); 30-44 yrs. (n=25); 45-59 yrs. (n=24) and over 60 yrs. (n=35). The Subjective Quality of Life Analyses questionnaire and the WHO User Manual were used as a primary research method. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to assess the differences between QoLDs, Kruskal Wallis test to assess differences in S-QoL among four independent groups and Mann Whitney U-test between two age categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest satisfaction in all age categories of women was found in the social relations domain, and in the 19-29 yr-old women equally in the social relations and physical health domains. The highest dissatisfaction was reported with the psychological health and environment domains. The key finding is that the main differences are between the youngest category (aged 19-29 yrs) and the three older categories with regard to physical health, environment and overall QoL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is necessary to continue this line of research with a greater focus on exploring the ways in which the psychological health domain can be improved as an integral part of S-QoL, and to also focus on the QoL indicators that make up the environment domain and search for ways to enhance these.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":"60 2","pages":"124-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/1f/sjph-60-124.PMC8015658.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2021-0018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to analyse and compare the subjective quality of life (S-QoL) of women with physical disabilities (PDs) through satisfaction with the quality of life domains and the overall quality of life assessment.

Methods: The sample comprised of women with PDs (n=137), divided into 4 age categories: 19-29 yrs. (n=53); 30-44 yrs. (n=25); 45-59 yrs. (n=24) and over 60 yrs. (n=35). The Subjective Quality of Life Analyses questionnaire and the WHO User Manual were used as a primary research method. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to assess the differences between QoLDs, Kruskal Wallis test to assess differences in S-QoL among four independent groups and Mann Whitney U-test between two age categories.

Results: The highest satisfaction in all age categories of women was found in the social relations domain, and in the 19-29 yr-old women equally in the social relations and physical health domains. The highest dissatisfaction was reported with the psychological health and environment domains. The key finding is that the main differences are between the youngest category (aged 19-29 yrs) and the three older categories with regard to physical health, environment and overall QoL.

Conclusions: It is necessary to continue this line of research with a greater focus on exploring the ways in which the psychological health domain can be improved as an integral part of S-QoL, and to also focus on the QoL indicators that make up the environment domain and search for ways to enhance these.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身体残疾妇女主观生活质量的年龄分类差异。
目的:通过对生活质量领域的满意度和总体生活质量评估,分析比较肢体残疾妇女的主观生活质量(S-QoL)。方法:选取pd女性137例,分为4个年龄段:19 ~ 29岁。(n = 53);30至44岁。(n = 25);45-59年。(n=24), 60岁以上。(n = 35)。主观生活质量分析问卷和世界卫生组织用户手册作为主要研究方法。使用Wilcoxon sign Rank检验评估qol之间的差异,使用Kruskal Wallis检验评估四个独立组间S-QoL的差异,使用Mann Whitney u检验评估两个年龄类别之间的差异。结果:各年龄段女性在社会关系领域的满意度最高,19-29岁女性在社会关系和身体健康领域的满意度相同。最不满意的是心理健康和环境领域。主要发现是,在身体健康、环境和总体生活质量方面,最年轻的类别(19-29岁)和三个年龄较大的类别之间存在主要差异。结论:有必要继续这方面的研究,更注重探索如何改善心理健康领域作为S-QoL的一个组成部分,并关注构成环境领域的QoL指标,并寻找提高这些指标的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Climate Change Worry in Slovenia: Associations with Sociodemographic Determinants and Mental Wellbeing. Characteristics of Allergy-related Emergency Medical Calls: A Retrospective Dispatch-based Study. Enhancing Glycaemic Control and Diabetes Self-care Behaviours through a Standardised Pharmacist-led Service: Evidence from Community Pharmacies in Southeastern Serbia. A Path to True Integration: Making Global Mental Health Commitments a National Reality. Traumatic and Psychosomatic Symptoms in Children Exposed to Peer Violence: A Cross-Sectional Study in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1