Differential response to pharmacological intervention in ADHD furthers our understanding of the mechanisms of interference control.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Cognitive Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-10 DOI:10.1080/02643294.2021.1908979
Aurélie Grandjean, Isabel Suarez, Aline Miquee, David Da Fonseca, Laurence Casini
{"title":"Differential response to pharmacological intervention in ADHD furthers our understanding of the mechanisms of interference control.","authors":"Aurélie Grandjean,&nbsp;Isabel Suarez,&nbsp;Aline Miquee,&nbsp;David Da Fonseca,&nbsp;Laurence Casini","doi":"10.1080/02643294.2021.1908979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The deficit in \"interference control\" found in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) could be due to two distinct processes, which are not disentangled in most studies: a larger susceptibility to activating prepotent response impulses and a deficit in suppressing them. Here, we investigated the effect of 1/ADHD and 2/ methylphenidate (MPH), on these two components of interference control. We compared interference control between untreated children with ADHD, children with ADHD under MPH, and typically developing children performing a Simon task. The main findings were that 1/ children with ADHD were more susceptible to reacting impulsively and less efficient at suppressing impulsive actions, and 2/ MPH improved the selective inhibition of impulsive actions but did not modify the strength of response impulse. This work provides an example of how pharmacological interventions and selective responses to them can be used to investigate and further our understanding of cognitive processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50670,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","volume":"38 2","pages":"138-152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02643294.2021.1908979","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2021.1908979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The deficit in "interference control" found in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) could be due to two distinct processes, which are not disentangled in most studies: a larger susceptibility to activating prepotent response impulses and a deficit in suppressing them. Here, we investigated the effect of 1/ADHD and 2/ methylphenidate (MPH), on these two components of interference control. We compared interference control between untreated children with ADHD, children with ADHD under MPH, and typically developing children performing a Simon task. The main findings were that 1/ children with ADHD were more susceptible to reacting impulsively and less efficient at suppressing impulsive actions, and 2/ MPH improved the selective inhibition of impulsive actions but did not modify the strength of response impulse. This work provides an example of how pharmacological interventions and selective responses to them can be used to investigate and further our understanding of cognitive processing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对ADHD药物干预的不同反应进一步加深了我们对干预控制机制的理解。
在患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童中发现的“干扰控制”缺陷可能是由于两个不同的过程,这两个过程在大多数研究中都没有得到解开:对激活强性反应冲动的更大易感性和对它们的抑制缺陷。在这里,我们研究了1/ADHD和2/哌醋甲酯(MPH)对这两个干扰控制成分的影响。我们比较了未治疗的ADHD儿童、MPH下的ADHD儿童和执行Simon任务的正常发育儿童之间的干扰控制。主要发现:1/ MPH的ADHD患儿更易产生冲动反应,抑制冲动行为的效率较低;2/ MPH的ADHD患儿可改善冲动行为的选择性抑制,但不能改变反应冲动的强度。这项工作提供了一个例子,说明如何使用药物干预和对它们的选择性反应来调查和进一步了解我们对认知加工的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Cognitive Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychology is of interest to cognitive scientists and neuroscientists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, psycholinguists, speech pathologists, physiotherapists, and psychiatrists.
期刊最新文献
The localization of coma. Does the procedural deficit hypothesis of dyslexia account for the lack of automatization and the comorbidity among developmental disorders? Developmental surface dyslexia and dysgraphia in a child with corpus callosum agenesis: an approach to diagnosis and treatment. The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent. The relationship between semantics, phonology, and naming performance in aphasia: a structural equation modeling approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1