Regional Disparities in Ovarian Cancer in the United States.

Cancer health disparities Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-08-19
Zhixin Wang, Sarah Dilley, HyounKyoung G Park, Alfred A Bartolucci, Chenguang Wang, Warner K Huh, Sejong Bae
{"title":"Regional Disparities in Ovarian Cancer in the United States.","authors":"Zhixin Wang,&nbsp;Sarah Dilley,&nbsp;HyounKyoung G Park,&nbsp;Alfred A Bartolucci,&nbsp;Chenguang Wang,&nbsp;Warner K Huh,&nbsp;Sejong Bae","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the association between geographic regions and ovarian cancer disparities in the United States. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was used to identify women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. 18 registries were divided into two groups: South region and US14 region. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions, the logistic regression model to evaluate the association between 5-year survival and other variables, and the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratios. The South region had a lower incidence rate than the US14 region (12.0 vs. 13.4 per 100,000), and a lower 5-year observed survival rate (37.5% vs. 39.8%). White women living in the US14 region had the best overall survival, compared to white women living in the South region, and black women living in both regions. Women in the South region were less likely to have insurance (6.6% vs. 2.7%, p<0.0001) and surgery (73.4% vs. 76.2%, p<0.0001). Women living in the South were 1.4 times more likely to die after five years of diagnosis than women living in the US14 region. The data confirmed regional disparities in ovarian cancer in the United States, showing women living in the South region were disadvantaged in ovarian cancer survival regardless of race, black or white. Future research focusing on the identification of contributing factors to regional disparity in ovarian cancer is necessary to develop practical approaches to improve health outcomes related to this lethal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":72512,"journal":{"name":"Cancer health disparities","volume":"3 ","pages":"e1-e12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034285/pdf/nihms-1034640.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer health disparities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between geographic regions and ovarian cancer disparities in the United States. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was used to identify women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. 18 registries were divided into two groups: South region and US14 region. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions, the logistic regression model to evaluate the association between 5-year survival and other variables, and the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratios. The South region had a lower incidence rate than the US14 region (12.0 vs. 13.4 per 100,000), and a lower 5-year observed survival rate (37.5% vs. 39.8%). White women living in the US14 region had the best overall survival, compared to white women living in the South region, and black women living in both regions. Women in the South region were less likely to have insurance (6.6% vs. 2.7%, p<0.0001) and surgery (73.4% vs. 76.2%, p<0.0001). Women living in the South were 1.4 times more likely to die after five years of diagnosis than women living in the US14 region. The data confirmed regional disparities in ovarian cancer in the United States, showing women living in the South region were disadvantaged in ovarian cancer survival regardless of race, black or white. Future research focusing on the identification of contributing factors to regional disparity in ovarian cancer is necessary to develop practical approaches to improve health outcomes related to this lethal disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国卵巢癌的地区差异。
这项研究的目的是调查美国地理区域和卵巢癌发病率差异之间的关系。来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目的数据用于确定诊断为卵巢癌的妇女。18个注册中心分为两组:南部地区和美国地区。采用卡方检验比较比例,采用logistic回归模型评价5年生存率与其他变量的相关性,采用Cox比例风险模型估计风险比。南方地区的发病率低于美国14地区(12.0比13.4 / 100000),5年观察生存率也较低(37.5%比39.8%)。与生活在南部地区的白人妇女和生活在这两个地区的黑人妇女相比,生活在美国14地区的白人妇女的总体存活率最高。南方地区的女性投保的可能性较低(6.6% vs. 2.7%, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Highlights from International Conference on Cancer Health Disparities 2021. Breast and Cervical cancer disparities in Alabama: current scenario, ongoing efforts to reduce the disparity gaps, and what more we could be doing. Racial differences in prostate tumor microenvironment: implications for disparate clinical outcomes and potential opportunities. Racial disparities in the genetic landscape of lung cancer. NACP: Partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1