Sexual dimorphism in mastoid process volumes measured from 3D models of dry crania from mediaeval Croatia.

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI:10.1127/homo/2021/1243
Anja Petaros, Sabrina B Sholts, Mislav Čavka, Mario Šlaus, Sebastian K T S Wärmländer
{"title":"Sexual dimorphism in mastoid process volumes measured from 3D models of dry crania from mediaeval Croatia.","authors":"Anja Petaros,&nbsp;Sabrina B Sholts,&nbsp;Mislav Čavka,&nbsp;Mario Šlaus,&nbsp;Sebastian K T S Wärmländer","doi":"10.1127/homo/2021/1243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>3D analysis of skeletal volumes has become an important field in digital anthropology studies. The volume of the mastoid process has been proposed to display significant sexual dimorphism, but it has a complex shape and to date no study has quantified the full mastoid volume for sex estimation purposes. In this study we compared three different ways to isolate the volume of the mastoid process from digital 3D models of dry crania, and then evaluated the performance of the three different volume definitions for sex estimation purposes. A total of 170 crania (86 male, 84 females) excavated from five medieval Croatian sites were CT-scanned and used to produce 3D stereolitographic models. The three different isolation techniques were based on various anatomical landmarks and planes, as well as the anatomy of the mastoid process itself. Measurements of the three different mastoid volumes yielded different accuracies and precisions. Interestingly, anatomical structures were sometimes more useful than classical landmarks as demarcators of mastoid volume. For all three volume definitions, male mastoid volumes were significantly larger than female volumes, in both relative and absolute numbers. Sex estimation based on mastoid volume showed a slightly higher precision and better accuracy (71% correct classifications) than visual scoring techniques (67%) and linear distance measurements (69%) of the mastoid process. Sex estimation based on cranial size performed even better (78%), and multifactorial analysis (cranium size + mastoid volume) reached up to 81% accuracy. These results show that measurements of the mastoid volume represent a promising metric to be used in multifactorial approaches for sex estimation of human remains.</p>","PeriodicalId":46714,"journal":{"name":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","volume":"72 2","pages":"113-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/homo/2021/1243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

3D analysis of skeletal volumes has become an important field in digital anthropology studies. The volume of the mastoid process has been proposed to display significant sexual dimorphism, but it has a complex shape and to date no study has quantified the full mastoid volume for sex estimation purposes. In this study we compared three different ways to isolate the volume of the mastoid process from digital 3D models of dry crania, and then evaluated the performance of the three different volume definitions for sex estimation purposes. A total of 170 crania (86 male, 84 females) excavated from five medieval Croatian sites were CT-scanned and used to produce 3D stereolitographic models. The three different isolation techniques were based on various anatomical landmarks and planes, as well as the anatomy of the mastoid process itself. Measurements of the three different mastoid volumes yielded different accuracies and precisions. Interestingly, anatomical structures were sometimes more useful than classical landmarks as demarcators of mastoid volume. For all three volume definitions, male mastoid volumes were significantly larger than female volumes, in both relative and absolute numbers. Sex estimation based on mastoid volume showed a slightly higher precision and better accuracy (71% correct classifications) than visual scoring techniques (67%) and linear distance measurements (69%) of the mastoid process. Sex estimation based on cranial size performed even better (78%), and multifactorial analysis (cranium size + mastoid volume) reached up to 81% accuracy. These results show that measurements of the mastoid volume represent a promising metric to be used in multifactorial approaches for sex estimation of human remains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从克罗地亚中世纪干颅骨三维模型测量乳突突体积的两性二态性。
骨骼体积的三维分析已成为数字人类学研究的一个重要领域。乳突的体积被认为显示出明显的性别二态性,但它具有复杂的形状,迄今为止还没有研究量化乳突的完整体积以用于性别估计。在这项研究中,我们比较了从干颅骨数字3D模型中分离乳突体积的三种不同方法,然后评估了三种不同体积定义的性能,用于性别估计。从五个中世纪克罗地亚遗址中挖掘出的170个头盖骨(86个男性,84个女性)进行了ct扫描,并用于制作3D立体模型。这三种不同的分离技术是基于不同的解剖标志和面,以及乳突本身的解剖结构。对三种不同乳突体积的测量产生了不同的准确度和精密度。有趣的是,作为乳突体积的分界,解剖结构有时比经典地标更有用。对于所有三种体积定义,男性乳突体积在相对和绝对数量上都明显大于女性体积。基于乳突体积的性别估计比目测评分技术(67%)和乳突线性距离测量(69%)的准确性略高,准确率(71%)略好。基于头盖骨大小的性别估计效果更好(78%),多因素分析(头盖骨大小+乳突体积)的准确率高达81%。这些结果表明,乳突体积的测量代表了一个有前途的指标,可用于多因素方法的性别估计的人类遗骸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Breathing time: a longue-durée multidisciplinary study of respiratory illnesses and airborne diseases in Switzerland (16th-21st century CE). Somatotype and body composition profiles of children and adolescent male basketball players. Flat feet occurrence among young school-age children and its association with body mass index values. Revisiting the age of the Florisbad hominin material. Reproductive behaviour and longevity: Evidence from Chinese centenarians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1