Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: systematic review.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Informatics for Health & Social Care Pub Date : 2021-06-02 Epub Date: 2021-04-10 DOI:10.1080/17538157.2021.1879810
Archana Tapuria, Talya Porat, Dipak Kalra, Glen Dsouza, Sun Xiaohui, Vasa Curcin
{"title":"Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: systematic review.","authors":"Archana Tapuria,&nbsp;Talya Porat,&nbsp;Dipak Kalra,&nbsp;Glen Dsouza,&nbsp;Sun Xiaohui,&nbsp;Vasa Curcin","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2021.1879810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient access to their own electronic health records (EHRs) is likely to become an integral part of healthcare systems worldwide. It has the potential to decrease the healthcare provision costs, improve access to healthcare data, self-care, quality of care, and health and patient-centered outcomes. This systematic literature review is aimed at identifying the impact in terms of benefits and issues that have so far been demonstrated by providing patients access to their own EHRs, via providers' secure patient portals from primary healthcare centers and hospitals. Searches were conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINHAL, and Google scholar. Over 2000 papers were screened and were filtered based on duplicates, then by reading the titles and finally based on their abstracts or full text. In total, 74 papers were retained, analyzed, and summarized. Papers were included if providing patient access to their own EHRs was the primary intervention used in the study and its impact or outcome was evaluated. The search technique used to identify relevant literature for this paper involved input from five experts. While findings from 54 of the 74 papers showed positive outcome or benefits of patient access to their EHRs via patient portals, 10 papers have highlighted concerns, 8 papers have highlighted both and 2 have highlighted absence of negative outcomes. The benefits range from re-assurance, reduced anxiety, positive impact on consultations, better doctor-patient relationship, increased awareness and adherence to medication, and improved patient outcomes (e.g., improving blood pressure and glycemic control in a range of study populations). In addition, patient access to their health information was found to improve self-reported levels of engagement or activation related to self-management, enhanced knowledge, and improve recovery scores, and organizational efficiencies in a tertiary level mental health care facility. However, three studies did not find any statistically significant effect of patient portals on health outcomes. The main concerns have been around security, privacy and confidentiality of the health records, and the anxiety it may cause amongst patients. This literature review identified some benefits, concerns, and attitudes demonstrated by providing patients' access to their own EHRs. This access is often part of government strategies when developing patient-centric self-management elements of a sustainable healthcare system. The findings of this review will give healthcare providers a framework to analyze the benefits offered by promoting patient access to EHRs and decide on the best approach for their own specialties and clinical setup. A robust cost-benefit evaluation of such initiatives along with its impact on major stakeholders within the healthcare system would be essential in understanding the overall impact of such initiatives. Implementation of patient access to their EHRs could help governments to appropriately prioritize the development or adoption of national standards, whilst taking care of local variations and fulfilling the healthcare needs of the population, e.g., UK Government is aiming to make full primary care records available online to every patient. Ultimately, increasing transparency and promoting personal responsibility are key elements of a sustainable healthcare system for future generations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":"46 2","pages":"192-204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538157.2021.1879810","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1879810","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Patient access to their own electronic health records (EHRs) is likely to become an integral part of healthcare systems worldwide. It has the potential to decrease the healthcare provision costs, improve access to healthcare data, self-care, quality of care, and health and patient-centered outcomes. This systematic literature review is aimed at identifying the impact in terms of benefits and issues that have so far been demonstrated by providing patients access to their own EHRs, via providers' secure patient portals from primary healthcare centers and hospitals. Searches were conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINHAL, and Google scholar. Over 2000 papers were screened and were filtered based on duplicates, then by reading the titles and finally based on their abstracts or full text. In total, 74 papers were retained, analyzed, and summarized. Papers were included if providing patient access to their own EHRs was the primary intervention used in the study and its impact or outcome was evaluated. The search technique used to identify relevant literature for this paper involved input from five experts. While findings from 54 of the 74 papers showed positive outcome or benefits of patient access to their EHRs via patient portals, 10 papers have highlighted concerns, 8 papers have highlighted both and 2 have highlighted absence of negative outcomes. The benefits range from re-assurance, reduced anxiety, positive impact on consultations, better doctor-patient relationship, increased awareness and adherence to medication, and improved patient outcomes (e.g., improving blood pressure and glycemic control in a range of study populations). In addition, patient access to their health information was found to improve self-reported levels of engagement or activation related to self-management, enhanced knowledge, and improve recovery scores, and organizational efficiencies in a tertiary level mental health care facility. However, three studies did not find any statistically significant effect of patient portals on health outcomes. The main concerns have been around security, privacy and confidentiality of the health records, and the anxiety it may cause amongst patients. This literature review identified some benefits, concerns, and attitudes demonstrated by providing patients' access to their own EHRs. This access is often part of government strategies when developing patient-centric self-management elements of a sustainable healthcare system. The findings of this review will give healthcare providers a framework to analyze the benefits offered by promoting patient access to EHRs and decide on the best approach for their own specialties and clinical setup. A robust cost-benefit evaluation of such initiatives along with its impact on major stakeholders within the healthcare system would be essential in understanding the overall impact of such initiatives. Implementation of patient access to their EHRs could help governments to appropriately prioritize the development or adoption of national standards, whilst taking care of local variations and fulfilling the healthcare needs of the population, e.g., UK Government is aiming to make full primary care records available online to every patient. Ultimately, increasing transparency and promoting personal responsibility are key elements of a sustainable healthcare system for future generations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者访问其电子健康记录的影响:系统审查。
患者访问自己的电子健康记录(EHRs)可能成为全球医疗保健系统的一个组成部分。它有可能降低医疗保健提供成本,改善对医疗保健数据的访问、自我保健、护理质量以及健康和以患者为中心的结果。本系统文献综述的目的是确定效益和问题方面的影响,迄今为止,通过提供者从初级卫生保健中心和医院的安全患者门户网站,为患者提供自己的电子病历,证明了这些影响。在PubMed, MEDLINE, CINHAL和Google scholar中进行了搜索。对2000多篇论文进行了筛选,并根据重复内容进行筛选,然后通过阅读标题进行筛选,最后根据摘要或全文进行筛选。共有74篇论文被保留、分析和总结。如果研究中使用的主要干预措施是为患者提供自己的电子病历,并评估了其影响或结果,则纳入论文。检索技术用于识别相关文献为这篇论文涉及输入五位专家。虽然74篇论文中有54篇的研究结果显示了患者通过患者门户访问其电子病历的积极结果或益处,但有10篇论文强调了担忧,8篇论文强调了两者,2篇论文强调了没有负面结果。益处包括安心、减少焦虑、对咨询产生积极影响、改善医患关系、提高对药物的认识和依从性,以及改善患者预后(例如,改善一系列研究人群的血压和血糖控制)。此外,研究发现,在三级精神卫生保健机构中,患者访问其健康信息可以提高自我报告的参与或与自我管理相关的激活水平,增强知识,并提高康复分数和组织效率。然而,三项研究并未发现患者门户网站对健康结果有任何统计学上显著的影响。主要的担忧是健康记录的安全性、隐私性和保密性,以及可能引起患者的焦虑。本文献综述确定了一些利益,关注和态度,通过向患者提供自己的电子病历。在开发可持续医疗保健系统中以患者为中心的自我管理元素时,这种访问通常是政府战略的一部分。本综述的发现将为医疗保健提供者提供一个框架,以分析促进患者使用电子病历所带来的好处,并根据自己的专业和临床设置决定最佳方法。对此类举措及其对医疗保健系统内主要利益相关者的影响进行强有力的成本效益评估,对于理解此类举措的总体影响至关重要。实施患者对其电子病历的访问可以帮助政府适当地优先考虑制定或采用国家标准,同时照顾地方差异并满足人口的医疗保健需求,例如,英国政府的目标是使每个患者都可以在线获得完整的初级保健记录。最终,提高透明度和促进个人责任是为子孙后代建立可持续医疗体系的关键要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus. The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems. Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects. Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome. Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of the infodemic scale. Personalized medicine meets artificial intelligence: beyond “hype”, towards the metaverse Technological acceptance and features needed in mobile health apps development for people living with dementia and their caregivers in Indonesia Alzheimer’s in the modern age: Ethical challenges in the use of digital monitoring to identify cognitive changes Self-care intervention using mobile apps for sexual and reproductive health in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1