The prevalence of celiac disease in women with infertility-A systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive Medicine and Biology Pub Date : 2021-03-22 eCollection Date: 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1002/rmb2.12374
Ida Glimberg, Linnea Haggård, Benjamin Lebwohl, Peter H R Green, Jonas F Ludvigsson
{"title":"The prevalence of celiac disease in women with infertility-A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Ida Glimberg, Linnea Haggård, Benjamin Lebwohl, Peter H R Green, Jonas F Ludvigsson","doi":"10.1002/rmb2.12374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the prevalence of celiac disease in infertile women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of four databases was conducted up until February 6, 2020. The search terms \"c(o)eliac disease\", \"gluten\", \"vill(o)us atrophy\", \"infertility\" and \"subfertility\" yielded 1142 unique hits. Articles in other languages than English, conference abstracts, letters, and publications where relevant information was missing were excluded. In our main analysis, celiac disease had to be verified by duodenal biopsy. The titles and abstracts, and the full-text articles were independently reviewed by two researchers. A fixed-effect model was used to calculate the weighted prevalence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 11 studies (1617 women), the pooled prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.7% (95% CI = 0.2%-1.2%) in women with any infertility. Restricting our study population to women with <i>unexplained</i> infertility, the pooled prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.6% (95% CI = 0.0%-1.6%). When including studies where celiac disease had been defined per serology (20 studies; 5158 women), the pooled prevalence of celiac disease was 1.1% (95% CI = 0.6%-1.6%) in women with any infertility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that celiac disease is not more common in infertile women than in the general population. Celiac screening in infertile women may have low yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":21116,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","volume":"20 2","pages":"224-233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/c8/RMB2-20-224.PMC8022102.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of celiac disease in infertile women.

Methods: A systematic search of four databases was conducted up until February 6, 2020. The search terms "c(o)eliac disease", "gluten", "vill(o)us atrophy", "infertility" and "subfertility" yielded 1142 unique hits. Articles in other languages than English, conference abstracts, letters, and publications where relevant information was missing were excluded. In our main analysis, celiac disease had to be verified by duodenal biopsy. The titles and abstracts, and the full-text articles were independently reviewed by two researchers. A fixed-effect model was used to calculate the weighted prevalence.

Results: Based on 11 studies (1617 women), the pooled prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.7% (95% CI = 0.2%-1.2%) in women with any infertility. Restricting our study population to women with unexplained infertility, the pooled prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.6% (95% CI = 0.0%-1.6%). When including studies where celiac disease had been defined per serology (20 studies; 5158 women), the pooled prevalence of celiac disease was 1.1% (95% CI = 0.6%-1.6%) in women with any infertility.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that celiac disease is not more common in infertile women than in the general population. Celiac screening in infertile women may have low yield.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不孕症妇女中乳糜泻的患病率--系统回顾与荟萃分析。
目的:确定不孕妇女乳糜泻的发病率:截至 2020 年 2 月 6 日,对四个数据库进行了系统检索。以 "乳糜泻"、"麸质"、"绒毛萎缩"、"不孕症 "和 "亚不孕症 "为检索词,共获得 1142 条独特的检索结果。除英文外,其他语言的文章、会议摘要、信件以及相关信息缺失的出版物均被排除在外。在我们的主要分析中,乳糜泻必须通过十二指肠活检来验证。标题和摘要以及全文均由两名研究人员独立审阅。采用固定效应模型计算加权患病率:结果:基于11项研究(1617名女性),在任何不孕症女性中,经活检证实的糜烂性胃炎的总患病率为0.7%(95% CI = 0.2%-1.2%)。将我们的研究人群限制在不明原因不孕的女性中,活检证实的乳糜泻发病率汇总为0.6%(95% CI = 0.0%-1.6%)。如果将根据血清学定义为乳糜泻的研究(20 项研究;5158 名妇女)包括在内,在任何不孕症妇女中,乳糜泻的总患病率为 1.1%(95% CI = 0.6%-1.6%):我们的研究结果表明,乳糜泻在不孕妇女中的发病率并不比普通人群高。在不孕妇女中进行乳糜泻筛查可能收效甚微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Medicine and Biology (RMB) is the official English journal of the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation, the Japan Society of Andrology, and publishes original research articles that report new findings or concepts in all aspects of reproductive phenomena in all kinds of mammals. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: andrology, endocrinology, oncology, immunology, genetics, function of gonads and genital tracts, erectile dysfunction, gametogenesis, function of accessory sex organs, fertilization, embryogenesis, embryo manipulation, pregnancy, implantation, ontogenesis, infectious disease, contraception, etc.
期刊最新文献
NR5A1 and cell population heterogeneity: Insights into developmental and functional disparities and regulatory mechanisms. The physiological role of macrophages in reproductive organs. Uterus transplantation: A clinical breakthrough after systematic preclinical research. Revisiting non-obstructive azoospermia: Is there a best way to retrieve testicular sperm? "Shortening time to pregnancy in infertile women by personalizing treatment of microbial imbalance through Emma & Alice: A multicenter prospective study".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1