Lung Transplant from ECMO: Current Results and Predictors of Post-transplant Mortality.

IF 2.4 Q2 SURGERY Current Transplantation Reports Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-06 DOI:10.1007/s40472-021-00323-4
Basil S Nasir, Jacob Klapper, Matthew Hartwig
{"title":"Lung Transplant from ECMO: Current Results and Predictors of Post-transplant Mortality.","authors":"Basil S Nasir,&nbsp;Jacob Klapper,&nbsp;Matthew Hartwig","doi":"10.1007/s40472-021-00323-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We examined data from the last 5 years describing extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a bridge to lung transplantation. We assessed predictors of survival to transplantation and post-transplant mortality.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The number of lung transplants performed worldwide is increasing. This is accompanied by an increase in the type of patients being transplanted, including sicker patients with more advanced disease. Consequently, there is an increase in the need for bridging strategies, with varying success. Several predictors of failure have been identified. Major risk factors include retransplantation, other organ dysfunction, and deconditioning.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>ECLS is a risky strategy but necessary for patients who would otherwise die if not bridged to transplantation. The presence of predictors for failure is not a contraindication for bridging. However, major risk factors should be approached cautiously. Other, more minor risk factors may be considered acceptable. More importantly, the strategy should be individualized for each patient to achieve the best possible outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36387,"journal":{"name":"Current Transplantation Reports","volume":"8 2","pages":"140-150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40472-021-00323-4","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Transplantation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-021-00323-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Purpose of review: We examined data from the last 5 years describing extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a bridge to lung transplantation. We assessed predictors of survival to transplantation and post-transplant mortality.

Recent findings: The number of lung transplants performed worldwide is increasing. This is accompanied by an increase in the type of patients being transplanted, including sicker patients with more advanced disease. Consequently, there is an increase in the need for bridging strategies, with varying success. Several predictors of failure have been identified. Major risk factors include retransplantation, other organ dysfunction, and deconditioning.

Summary: ECLS is a risky strategy but necessary for patients who would otherwise die if not bridged to transplantation. The presence of predictors for failure is not a contraindication for bridging. However, major risk factors should be approached cautiously. Other, more minor risk factors may be considered acceptable. More importantly, the strategy should be individualized for each patient to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ECMO肺移植:移植后死亡率的当前结果和预测因素。
回顾目的:我们研究了过去5年描述体外生命支持(ECLS)作为肺移植的桥梁的数据。我们评估了移植生存和移植后死亡率的预测因素。最近的研究发现:世界范围内进行的肺移植数量正在增加。与此同时,接受移植的患者类型也在增加,包括病情较重、病情较晚期的患者。因此,对衔接战略的需求有所增加,取得了不同程度的成功。已经确定了几个失败的预测因素。主要的危险因素包括再移植、其他器官功能障碍和去适应。总结:ECLS是一种有风险的策略,但对于那些如果不接受移植就会死亡的患者来说是必要的。失败预测因素的存在并不是桥接的禁忌症。然而,主要的风险因素应该谨慎对待。其他更小的危险因素也可以接受。更重要的是,该策略应该针对每个患者进行个体化,以达到最佳可能的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Under the guidance of Dr. Dorry Segev, from Johns Hopkins, Current Transplantation Reports will provide an in-depth review of topics covering kidney, liver, and pancreatic transplantation in addition to immunology and composite allografts.We accomplish this aim by inviting international authorities to contribute review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists.  By providing clear, insightful balanced contributions, the journal intends to serve those involved in the field of transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of Entecavir Prophylaxis in Hepatitis B Immune Patients Receiving Hepatitis B Infected Kidneys: A Single Center Experience Have a Heart: Tie It Off — Update on Recommendations Regarding Vascular Access Ligation After Successful Renal Transplant Multi-omics Approach in Kidney Transplant: Lessons Learned from COVID-19 Pandemic. Innate Immune Responses in Transplant Immunity Outcomes, Attitudes, and Updated Ethical Analysis of Early Liver Transplantation for Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1