Bioterrorism and mass casualty preparedness in hospitals: United States, 2003.

Advance data Pub Date : 2005-09-27
Richard W Niska, Catharine W Burt
{"title":"Bioterrorism and mass casualty preparedness in hospitals: United States, 2003.","authors":"Richard W Niska,&nbsp;Catharine W Burt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the content of hospital terrorism preparedness emergency response plans; whether those plans had been updated since September 11, 2001; collaboration of hospitals with outside organizations; clinician training in the management of biological, chemical, explosive, and nuclear exposures; drills on the response plans; and equipment and bed capacity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) is an annual survey of a probability sample of approximately 500 non-Federal general and short-stay hospitals in the United States. A Bioterrorism and Mass Casualty Supplement was included in the 2003 survey and provided the data for this analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost all hospitals have plans for responding to natural disasters (97.3 percent). Most have plans for responding to chemical (85.5 percent), biological (84.8 percent), nuclear or radiological (77.2 percent), and explosive incidents (76.9 percent). About three-quarters of hospitals were integrated into community-wide disaster plans (76.4 percent), and 75.9 percent specifically reported a cooperative planning process with other local health care facilities. Despite these plans, only 46.1 percent reported written memoranda of understanding with these facilities to accept inpatients during a declared disaster. Hospitals varied widely in their plans for re-arranging schedules and space in the event of a disaster. Training for hospital incident command and smallpox, anthrax, chemical, and radiological exposures was ahead of training for other infectious diseases. The percentage of hospitals training their staff in any exposure varied from 92.1 percent for nurses to 49.2 percent for medical residents. Drills for natural disasters occurred more often than those for chemical, biological, explosive, nuclear, and epidemic incidents. More hospitals staged drills for biological attacks than for severe epidemics. Despite explosions being the most common form of terrorism, drills for these were staged by only one-fifth of hospitals. Hospitals collaborated on drills most often with emergency medical services, fire departments, and law enforcement agencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":79552,"journal":{"name":"Advance data","volume":" 364","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advance data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the content of hospital terrorism preparedness emergency response plans; whether those plans had been updated since September 11, 2001; collaboration of hospitals with outside organizations; clinician training in the management of biological, chemical, explosive, and nuclear exposures; drills on the response plans; and equipment and bed capacity.

Methods: The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) is an annual survey of a probability sample of approximately 500 non-Federal general and short-stay hospitals in the United States. A Bioterrorism and Mass Casualty Supplement was included in the 2003 survey and provided the data for this analysis.

Results: Almost all hospitals have plans for responding to natural disasters (97.3 percent). Most have plans for responding to chemical (85.5 percent), biological (84.8 percent), nuclear or radiological (77.2 percent), and explosive incidents (76.9 percent). About three-quarters of hospitals were integrated into community-wide disaster plans (76.4 percent), and 75.9 percent specifically reported a cooperative planning process with other local health care facilities. Despite these plans, only 46.1 percent reported written memoranda of understanding with these facilities to accept inpatients during a declared disaster. Hospitals varied widely in their plans for re-arranging schedules and space in the event of a disaster. Training for hospital incident command and smallpox, anthrax, chemical, and radiological exposures was ahead of training for other infectious diseases. The percentage of hospitals training their staff in any exposure varied from 92.1 percent for nurses to 49.2 percent for medical residents. Drills for natural disasters occurred more often than those for chemical, biological, explosive, nuclear, and epidemic incidents. More hospitals staged drills for biological attacks than for severe epidemics. Despite explosions being the most common form of terrorism, drills for these were staged by only one-fifth of hospitals. Hospitals collaborated on drills most often with emergency medical services, fire departments, and law enforcement agencies.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院中的生物恐怖主义和大规模伤亡防备:美国,2003年。
目的:研究医院恐怖主义应急预案的内容;这些计划自2001年9月11日以来是否更新过;医院与外部组织的合作;临床医生在生物、化学、爆炸和核暴露管理方面的培训;演练应急预案;以及设备和床位容量。方法:国家医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)是一项年度调查,对美国约500家非联邦综合医院和短期住院医院进行概率抽样。2003年的调查包括了一份生物恐怖主义和大规模伤亡副刊,并为这一分析提供了数据。结果:几乎所有医院(97.3%)都有应对自然灾害的预案。大多数都有应对化学(85.5%)、生物(84.8%)、核或放射性(77.2%)和爆炸事件(76.9%)的计划。大约四分之三的医院(76.4%)纳入了社区范围的灾害计划,75.9%的医院具体报告了与其他当地卫生保健机构的合作规划过程。尽管有这些计划,但只有46.1%的人报告说,他们与这些机构签署了书面谅解备忘录,以便在宣布发生灾难时接收住院病人。医院在灾难发生时重新安排时间和空间的计划上差异很大。医院事故指挥和天花、炭疽、化学和放射性暴露方面的培训先于其他传染病方面的培训。医院对员工进行相关培训的比例从护士的92.1%到住院医师的49.2%不等。应对自然灾害的演习比应对化学、生物、爆炸、核、流行病等事件的演习更为频繁。与应对严重流行病的演习相比,更多的医院开展了应对生物袭击的演习。尽管爆炸是最常见的恐怖主义形式,但只有五分之一的医院进行了此类演习。医院经常与紧急医疗服务、消防部门和执法机构合作进行演习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthy Eating Index scores among adults, 60 years of age and over, by sociodemographic and health characteristics: United States, 1999-2002. Health characteristics of the Asian adult population: United States, 2004-2006. Health characteristics of the Asian adult population: United States, 2004-2006. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006. Fall injury episodes among noninstitutionalized older adults: United States, 2001-2003.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1