Clinical trial designs for prospective validation of biomarkers.

Sumithra J Mandrekar, Axel Grothey, Matthew P Goetz, Daniel J Sargent
{"title":"Clinical trial designs for prospective validation of biomarkers.","authors":"Sumithra J Mandrekar,&nbsp;Axel Grothey,&nbsp;Matthew P Goetz,&nbsp;Daniel J Sargent","doi":"10.2165/00129785-200505050-00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, anatomic staging systems have been used to determine predictions of individual patient outcome and, to a lesser extent, guide the choice of treatment in patients with cancer. With new targeted therapies, the role of biomarkers is increasingly promising, suggesting an integrated approach using the genetic make-up of the tumor and the genotype of the patient for treatment selection and patient management. Specifically, biomarkers can aid in patient stratification (risk assessment), treatment response identification (surrogate markers), or in differential diagnosis (identifying individuals who are likely to respond to specific drugs). To be clinically useful, a marker must favorably affect clinical outcomes such as decreased toxicity, increased overall and/or disease-free survival, or improved quality of life. This paper focuses on possible clinical trial designs for assessing the utility of a predictive marker(s) for toxicity or clinical efficacy. We consider the scenario of single and multiple markers as well as present alternative solutions based on the prevalence of a marker. Our designs rest on the assumption that the methods for assessment of the biomarker are established and the initial results show promise with regard to the predictive ability of a marker. Additional research is clearly warranted to achieve the goal of 'predictive oncology'.</p>","PeriodicalId":72171,"journal":{"name":"American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00129785-200505050-00004","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00129785-200505050-00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

Traditionally, anatomic staging systems have been used to determine predictions of individual patient outcome and, to a lesser extent, guide the choice of treatment in patients with cancer. With new targeted therapies, the role of biomarkers is increasingly promising, suggesting an integrated approach using the genetic make-up of the tumor and the genotype of the patient for treatment selection and patient management. Specifically, biomarkers can aid in patient stratification (risk assessment), treatment response identification (surrogate markers), or in differential diagnosis (identifying individuals who are likely to respond to specific drugs). To be clinically useful, a marker must favorably affect clinical outcomes such as decreased toxicity, increased overall and/or disease-free survival, or improved quality of life. This paper focuses on possible clinical trial designs for assessing the utility of a predictive marker(s) for toxicity or clinical efficacy. We consider the scenario of single and multiple markers as well as present alternative solutions based on the prevalence of a marker. Our designs rest on the assumption that the methods for assessment of the biomarker are established and the initial results show promise with regard to the predictive ability of a marker. Additional research is clearly warranted to achieve the goal of 'predictive oncology'.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物标志物前瞻性验证的临床试验设计。
传统上,解剖分期系统已用于确定个体患者预后的预测,并在较小程度上指导癌症患者的治疗选择。随着新的靶向治疗的出现,生物标志物的作用越来越有希望,这表明一种利用肿瘤的基因组成和患者的基因型进行治疗选择和患者管理的综合方法。具体来说,生物标志物可以帮助患者分层(风险评估)、治疗反应识别(替代标志物)或鉴别诊断(识别可能对特定药物有反应的个体)。要在临床上有用,标志物必须对临床结果产生有利影响,如毒性降低,总体和/或无病生存期增加,或生活质量改善。本文着重于可能的临床试验设计,以评估毒性或临床疗效的预测标记物的效用。我们考虑了单一和多个标记的情况,并根据标记的流行程度提出了替代解决方案。我们的设计基于这样的假设,即生物标志物的评估方法已经建立,并且初步结果显示了标志物的预测能力。为了实现“预测肿瘤学”的目标,进一步的研究显然是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards molecular medicine: a case for a biological periodic table. Genetic testing in Crohn disease: utility in individualizing patient management. Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers of cancer drug response. The Autism Genome Project: goals and strategies. Oncogenes as novel targets for cancer therapy (part II): Intermediate signaling molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1