Levosimendan improves postresuscitation outcomes in a rat model of CPR

Lei Huang , Max Harry Weil , Shijie Sun , Gianluca Cammarata , Lan Cao , Wanchun Tang
{"title":"Levosimendan improves postresuscitation outcomes in a rat model of CPR","authors":"Lei Huang ,&nbsp;Max Harry Weil ,&nbsp;Shijie Sun ,&nbsp;Gianluca Cammarata ,&nbsp;Lan Cao ,&nbsp;Wanchun Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.lab.2005.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study we sought to determine whether a calcium sensitizer, levosimendan, would have a more favorable effect on postresuscitation myocardial function and, consequently, postresuscitation survival than β-adrenergic dobutamine. The extreme decrease in survival before hospital discharge of resuscitated victims is attributed, in part, to postresuscitation myocardial failure, and dobutamine has been recommended for the management of postresuscitation myocardial failure. We studied a total of 15 animals. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 450 to 550 g. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including chest compressions and mechanical ventilation, was begun after 8 minutes of untreated cardiac arrest. Electrical defibrillation was attempted after 6 minutes of CPR. Each animal was resuscitated. Animals were randomized to undergo treatment with levosimendan, dobutamine, or saline-solution placebo. These agents were administered 10 minutes after the return of spontaneous circulation. Levosimendan was administered in a loading dose of 12 μg kg<sup>−1</sup> over a 10-minute period, followed by infusion of 0.3 μg kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> over the next 230 minutes. Dobutamine was continuously infused at a dosage of 3 μg kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>. Saline-solution placebo was administered in the same volume and over the same amount of time as levosimendan. Levosimendan and dobutamine produced comparable increases in cardiac output and rate of left-ventricular pressure increase. However, administration of levosimendan resulted in lower heart rates and lesser increases in left ventricular diastolic pressure compared with both dobutamine and placebo. The duration of postresuscitation survival was significantly greater with levosimendan (16±2 hours), intermediate with dobutamine (11±2 hours) and least with saline-solution placebo (8±1 hour). Levosimendan and dobutamine both improved postresuscitation myocardial function. However, levosimendan produced more favorable postresuscitation myocardial function and increased the duration of postresuscitation survival.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","volume":"146 5","pages":"Pages 256-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lab.2005.07.005","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022214305002532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

In this study we sought to determine whether a calcium sensitizer, levosimendan, would have a more favorable effect on postresuscitation myocardial function and, consequently, postresuscitation survival than β-adrenergic dobutamine. The extreme decrease in survival before hospital discharge of resuscitated victims is attributed, in part, to postresuscitation myocardial failure, and dobutamine has been recommended for the management of postresuscitation myocardial failure. We studied a total of 15 animals. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 450 to 550 g. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including chest compressions and mechanical ventilation, was begun after 8 minutes of untreated cardiac arrest. Electrical defibrillation was attempted after 6 minutes of CPR. Each animal was resuscitated. Animals were randomized to undergo treatment with levosimendan, dobutamine, or saline-solution placebo. These agents were administered 10 minutes after the return of spontaneous circulation. Levosimendan was administered in a loading dose of 12 μg kg−1 over a 10-minute period, followed by infusion of 0.3 μg kg−1 min−1 over the next 230 minutes. Dobutamine was continuously infused at a dosage of 3 μg kg−1 min−1. Saline-solution placebo was administered in the same volume and over the same amount of time as levosimendan. Levosimendan and dobutamine produced comparable increases in cardiac output and rate of left-ventricular pressure increase. However, administration of levosimendan resulted in lower heart rates and lesser increases in left ventricular diastolic pressure compared with both dobutamine and placebo. The duration of postresuscitation survival was significantly greater with levosimendan (16±2 hours), intermediate with dobutamine (11±2 hours) and least with saline-solution placebo (8±1 hour). Levosimendan and dobutamine both improved postresuscitation myocardial function. However, levosimendan produced more favorable postresuscitation myocardial function and increased the duration of postresuscitation survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左西孟旦改善大鼠心肺复苏模型的复苏后结果
在这项研究中,我们试图确定钙增敏剂左西孟旦是否比β-肾上腺素能多巴酚丁胺对复苏后心肌功能和复苏后生存率有更有利的影响。复苏患者出院前生存率的急剧下降部分归因于复苏后心肌衰竭,多巴酚丁胺已被推荐用于复苏后心肌衰竭的管理。我们总共研究了15只动物。体重450 ~ 550 g的Sprague-Dawley大鼠心室颤动。心肺复苏(CPR),包括胸部按压和机械通气,在未经治疗的心脏骤停8分钟后开始。心肺复苏术6分钟后尝试电除颤。每只动物都苏醒了。动物随机接受左西孟旦、多巴酚丁胺或盐水溶液安慰剂治疗。这些药物在自然循环恢复后10分钟给药。左西孟旦以12 μg kg−1的负荷剂量在10分钟内给药,然后在接下来的230分钟内输注0.3 μg kg−1 min−1。以3 μg kg−1 min−1的剂量持续输注多巴酚丁胺。盐溶液安慰剂与左西孟旦以相同的体积和相同的时间给予。左西孟旦和多巴酚丁胺在心输出量和左心室压升高率方面产生了相当的增加。然而,与多巴酚丁胺和安慰剂相比,左西孟旦的使用导致较低的心率和较小的左心室舒张压升高。左西孟旦组复苏后生存时间显著延长(16±2小时),多巴酚丁胺组居中(11±2小时),盐水溶液安慰剂组最短(8±1小时)。左西孟旦和多巴酚丁胺均可改善复苏后心肌功能。然而,左西孟旦复苏后心肌功能更有利,复苏后生存时间延长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Instructions to authors Masthead Contents Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1