Comparing outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with international benchmarks: audit from an Italian vascular surgery department.

Gioacchino Coppi, Roberto Moratto, Giovanni Ragazzi, Emanuele Nicolosi, Roberto Silingardi, Giulio Benassi Franciosi, Anna Vittoria Ciardullo
{"title":"Comparing outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with international benchmarks: audit from an Italian vascular surgery department.","authors":"Gioacchino Coppi,&nbsp;Roberto Moratto,&nbsp;Giovanni Ragazzi,&nbsp;Emanuele Nicolosi,&nbsp;Roberto Silingardi,&nbsp;Giulio Benassi Franciosi,&nbsp;Anna Vittoria Ciardullo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the current practice of our department of vascular surgery with international benchmarks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-patient data from 488 CEA performed in both symptomatic 145 (29.7%) and asymptomatic 343 (70.3%) patients with a > or = 60% stenosis at the level of the internal carotid artery. Comprehensive retrospective review of the records for all the CEAs performed during a 2-year period. The main outcome measures were death rate, and fatal and non-fatal stroke rates perioperatively, and at 30 and 180 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fatal and non-fatal stroke rates of symptomatic patients were: 0.7% perioperatively, 0.7% at 30 days, and 0.7% at 180 days. The fatal and non-fatal stroke rates of asymptomatic patients were: 0.6% perioperatively, 0.6% at 30 days, and 0.3% at 180 days. The death rates of symptomatic patients were 0% for all time periods. The death rates of asymptomatic patients were: 0% perioperatively, 0% at 30 days, and 0.3% at 180 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present comprehensive audit shows that our surgeons achieve CEA outcomes comparable with international benchmarks.</p>","PeriodicalId":80289,"journal":{"name":"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","volume":"6 11","pages":"917-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the current practice of our department of vascular surgery with international benchmarks.

Methods: In-patient data from 488 CEA performed in both symptomatic 145 (29.7%) and asymptomatic 343 (70.3%) patients with a > or = 60% stenosis at the level of the internal carotid artery. Comprehensive retrospective review of the records for all the CEAs performed during a 2-year period. The main outcome measures were death rate, and fatal and non-fatal stroke rates perioperatively, and at 30 and 180 days.

Results: The fatal and non-fatal stroke rates of symptomatic patients were: 0.7% perioperatively, 0.7% at 30 days, and 0.7% at 180 days. The fatal and non-fatal stroke rates of asymptomatic patients were: 0.6% perioperatively, 0.6% at 30 days, and 0.3% at 180 days. The death rates of symptomatic patients were 0% for all time periods. The death rates of asymptomatic patients were: 0% perioperatively, 0% at 30 days, and 0.3% at 180 days.

Conclusions: The present comprehensive audit shows that our surgeons achieve CEA outcomes comparable with international benchmarks.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈动脉内膜切除术与国际基准的比较结果:来自意大利血管外科的审计。
背景:本研究的目的是比较我血管外科目前实践中颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的结果与国际基准。方法:来自488例CEA的住院患者数据,包括有症状的145例(29.7%)和无症状的343例(70.3%),这些患者在颈内动脉水平狭窄>或= 60%。对2年期间进行的所有cea的记录进行全面回顾性审查。主要结局指标为围手术期、30天和180天的死亡率、致死性和非致死性卒中发生率。结果:有症状患者的致死性和非致死性卒中发生率分别为:围手术期0.7%,30天0.7%,180天0.7%。无症状患者的致死性和非致死性卒中发生率为:围手术期0.6%,30天0.6%,180天0.3%。所有时间段有症状患者的死亡率均为0%。无症状患者围手术期死亡率为0%,30天死亡率为0%,180天死亡率为0.3%。结论:目前的综合审计表明,我们的外科医生达到了与国际基准相当的CEA结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence for a "gender paradox" in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: adverse preprocedural risk but favorable long-term clinical outcome in women. Ectasia of the ascending aorta at the time of aortic valve surgery: replace or relax? A clinical approach for cardiovascular monitoring of HIV-infected patients. Results from an observational cohort study. Surgical treatment of an aneurysm originating from a Kommerell's diverticulum in the right-sided aortic arch with retroesophageal component. Double aneurysm of the left ventricular wall following cardiac perforation after aortic valvuloplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1