An evaluation of the responsiveness of a comprehensive set of outcome measures for children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries.

N Thomas-Stonell, P Johnson, P Rumney, V Wright, B Oddson
{"title":"An evaluation of the responsiveness of a comprehensive set of outcome measures for children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries.","authors":"N Thomas-Stonell,&nbsp;P Johnson,&nbsp;P Rumney,&nbsp;V Wright,&nbsp;B Oddson","doi":"10.1080/13638490500050097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relative responsiveness of nine outcome measure scales was evaluated with 33 children and adolescents (aged 4-18 years) who had sustained traumatic brain injuries. Scales were selected to evaluate outcomes from each of the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains. The outcome measures were administered to all participants during their inpatient rehabilitation stay and again at a follow-up clinic visit. No single outcome measure captured the diversity of improvement in this sample. The measures agreed that improvement had occurred, but did not agree about which children were improving. This result suggests that the scales were measuring different skills and outcomes. Three of the measures used in combination, either the Child Health Questionnaire or the Functional Independence Measure for Children, the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association National Outcome Measures System (Birth to Kindergarten NOMS/School-aged Health Care) and the Gross Motor Function Measure, are sufficient to detect change in each of the children where change occurred. The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory and the MultiAttribute Health Status Classification were the least responsive of the nine measures used.</p>","PeriodicalId":79705,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric rehabilitation","volume":"9 1","pages":"14-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13638490500050097","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490500050097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

The relative responsiveness of nine outcome measure scales was evaluated with 33 children and adolescents (aged 4-18 years) who had sustained traumatic brain injuries. Scales were selected to evaluate outcomes from each of the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains. The outcome measures were administered to all participants during their inpatient rehabilitation stay and again at a follow-up clinic visit. No single outcome measure captured the diversity of improvement in this sample. The measures agreed that improvement had occurred, but did not agree about which children were improving. This result suggests that the scales were measuring different skills and outcomes. Three of the measures used in combination, either the Child Health Questionnaire or the Functional Independence Measure for Children, the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association National Outcome Measures System (Birth to Kindergarten NOMS/School-aged Health Care) and the Gross Motor Function Measure, are sufficient to detect change in each of the children where change occurred. The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory and the MultiAttribute Health Status Classification were the least responsive of the nine measures used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对创伤性脑损伤儿童和青少年的一套综合结果措施的反应性评价。
对33例持续颅脑外伤的儿童和青少年(4-18岁)进行了9项结果测量量表的相对反应性评估。选择量表来评估世界卫生组织(世卫组织)国际功能、残疾和健康分类各领域的结果。结果测量在所有参与者的住院康复期间进行,并在随访的诊所访问中再次进行。在这个样本中,没有一个单一的结果测量方法能够捕捉到改善的多样性。这些措施一致认为已经有所改善,但对于哪些儿童正在改善却没有达成一致意见。这一结果表明,这些量表衡量的是不同的技能和结果。儿童健康问卷或儿童功能独立性测量、美国语言听力协会国家结果测量系统(从出生到幼儿园/学龄卫生保健)和大运动功能测量这三种综合使用的测量方法足以检测每个发生变化的儿童的变化。儿童残疾评估量表和多属性健康状态分类是所使用的九种测量方法中反应最低的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Musculoskeletal Conditions Neuromuscular Conditions Hypertonia Rheumatologic Conditions Acquired Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1