Virus perpetuation in populations: biological variables that determine persistence or eradication.

N Nathanson
{"title":"Virus perpetuation in populations: biological variables that determine persistence or eradication.","authors":"N Nathanson","doi":"10.1007/3-211-29981-5_2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this review, I use the term \"perpetuation\" for persistence of a virus in a population, since this is a different phenomenon from persistence of a virus in an infected host. Important variables that influence perpetuation differ in small (<1000 individuals) and large (>10,000) populations: in small populations, two important variables are persistence in individuals, and turnover of the population, while in large populations important variables are transmissibility, generation time, and seasonality. In small populations, viruses such as poliovirus that cause acute infections cannot readily be perpetuated, in contrast to viruses such as hepatitis B virus, that cause persistent infections. However, small animal populations can turnover significantly each year, permitting the perpetuation of some viruses that cause acute infections. Large populations of humans are necessary for the perpetuation of acute viruses; for instance, measles required a population of 500,000 for perpetuation in the pre-measles vaccine era. Furthermore, if an acute virus, such as poliovirus, exhibits marked seasonality in large populations, then it may disappear during the seasonal trough, even in the presence of a large number of susceptible persons. Eradication is the converse of perpetuation and can be used as a definitive approach to the control of a viral disease, as in the instance of smallpox. Therefore, the requirements for perpetuation have significant implications for practical public health goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":77010,"journal":{"name":"Archives of virology. Supplementum","volume":" 19","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/3-211-29981-5_2","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of virology. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-29981-5_2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In this review, I use the term "perpetuation" for persistence of a virus in a population, since this is a different phenomenon from persistence of a virus in an infected host. Important variables that influence perpetuation differ in small (<1000 individuals) and large (>10,000) populations: in small populations, two important variables are persistence in individuals, and turnover of the population, while in large populations important variables are transmissibility, generation time, and seasonality. In small populations, viruses such as poliovirus that cause acute infections cannot readily be perpetuated, in contrast to viruses such as hepatitis B virus, that cause persistent infections. However, small animal populations can turnover significantly each year, permitting the perpetuation of some viruses that cause acute infections. Large populations of humans are necessary for the perpetuation of acute viruses; for instance, measles required a population of 500,000 for perpetuation in the pre-measles vaccine era. Furthermore, if an acute virus, such as poliovirus, exhibits marked seasonality in large populations, then it may disappear during the seasonal trough, even in the presence of a large number of susceptible persons. Eradication is the converse of perpetuation and can be used as a definitive approach to the control of a viral disease, as in the instance of smallpox. Therefore, the requirements for perpetuation have significant implications for practical public health goals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病毒在人群中的延续:决定持续或根除的生物变量。
在这篇综述中,我使用术语“永续”来描述病毒在群体中的持久性,因为这与病毒在受感染宿主中的持久性是不同的现象。影响永续性的重要变量在小种群(10,000个)中有所不同:在小种群中,两个重要变量是个体的持久性和种群的周转率,而在大种群中,重要变量是可传性、世代时间和季节性。在小群体中,引起急性感染的脊髓灰质炎病毒等病毒不容易永久存在,这与引起持续感染的乙型肝炎病毒等病毒形成对比。然而,小动物种群每年可大量更替,使一些引起急性感染的病毒得以延续。大量人群是急性病毒持续存在的必要条件;例如,在麻疹前疫苗时代,麻疹需要50万人口才能持续存在。此外,如果一种急性病毒,如脊髓灰质炎病毒,在大量人群中表现出明显的季节性,那么它可能在季节性低谷期间消失,即使有大量易感人群在场。根除是永久化的反面,可以作为控制病毒性疾病的决定性方法,例如天花。因此,永久化的要求对实际的公共卫生目标具有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Filoviruses. A compendium of 40 years of epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory studies. Pathogenesis of Rift Valley fever virus in mosquitoes--tracheal conduits & the basal lamina as an extra-cellular barrier. The virulence of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus: unraveling the enigma. Transient or occult HIV infections may occur more frequently than progressive infections: changing the paradigm about HIV persistence. The role of reverse genetics systems in determining filovirus pathogenicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1