[Analysis of bite marks].

Revue belge de medecine dentaire Pub Date : 2005-01-01
Marc Spiessens, Bram Van der Velden, Guy Willems
{"title":"[Analysis of bite marks].","authors":"Marc Spiessens,&nbsp;Bram Van der Velden,&nbsp;Guy Willems","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Precise photographs, supplemented by impressions are used to research and compare bite marks. Different materials for impressions are available to the forensic odontologist. Subsequently, the acquired information of the bite mark will be compared with the dentition of a suspect through photographs, intra- and extra oral examination and impressions. The overlay, which can be created using a variety of methods, allows the comparison between the bite mark and the dentition of the suspect. Among the most commonly used are hand-tracing of study models, wax bites or photocopies, or the radio-opaque wax bite method. Thanks to modern technology and the use of computers, analyses of bite marks have gradually become more accurate. Current research carried out at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven will demonstrate whether the computer program ForensicIQ is able to offer an even more precise comparison between a given bite mark and the dentition of a suspect. By no means should bite mark analysis alone be allowed to lead to a guilty verdict, but it will offer the opportunity to exclude a suspect from a crime when the data do not correspond.</p>","PeriodicalId":77359,"journal":{"name":"Revue belge de medecine dentaire","volume":"60 3","pages":"203-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue belge de medecine dentaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precise photographs, supplemented by impressions are used to research and compare bite marks. Different materials for impressions are available to the forensic odontologist. Subsequently, the acquired information of the bite mark will be compared with the dentition of a suspect through photographs, intra- and extra oral examination and impressions. The overlay, which can be created using a variety of methods, allows the comparison between the bite mark and the dentition of the suspect. Among the most commonly used are hand-tracing of study models, wax bites or photocopies, or the radio-opaque wax bite method. Thanks to modern technology and the use of computers, analyses of bite marks have gradually become more accurate. Current research carried out at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven will demonstrate whether the computer program ForensicIQ is able to offer an even more precise comparison between a given bite mark and the dentition of a suspect. By no means should bite mark analysis alone be allowed to lead to a guilty verdict, but it will offer the opportunity to exclude a suspect from a crime when the data do not correspond.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[咬痕分析]。
精确的照片,加上印记,被用来研究和比较咬痕。法医齿科医生可以使用不同的印模材料。随后,将获得的咬痕信息通过照片、口腔内外检查和印模与嫌疑人的牙列进行比较。可以使用多种方法创建的覆盖层可以将咬痕和嫌疑人的牙列进行比较。其中最常用的是手工追踪研究模型,蜡咬或复印,或无线电不透明蜡咬法。由于现代技术和计算机的使用,对咬痕的分析逐渐变得更加准确。目前在鲁汶天主教大学进行的研究将展示计算机程序forensic iciq是否能够在给定的咬痕和嫌疑人的牙齿之间提供更精确的比较。绝不应该让咬痕分析本身导致有罪判决,但它将提供在数据不符合时排除犯罪嫌疑人的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Value(s)]. Esthetic Dentistry [Occupational diseases in sugar workers. Results of an enquiry. 1926]. [The Industrial Accidents act (1903) and the birth of the Industrial Accidents Fund (1967)]. [Revision of the guidelines for the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders approved by the "Council of the AADR" 3 March 2010].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1