Relationship of 99mtechnetium labelled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) uptake by colorectal liver metastases to response following Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT).

Atul Dhabuwala, Prue Lamerton, Richard S Stubbs
{"title":"Relationship of 99mtechnetium labelled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) uptake by colorectal liver metastases to response following Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT).","authors":"Atul Dhabuwala,&nbsp;Prue Lamerton,&nbsp;Richard S Stubbs","doi":"10.1186/1471-2385-5-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SIRT is an emerging treatment for liver tumours which relies on the selective uptake by tumour of 90Y microspheres following hepatic arterial injection. Response rates of around 90% are reported. Hepatic arterial injection of MAA gives an indication of the expected distribution of 90Y microspheres within the liver. This study sought to determine if the MAA scan could be predictive of subsequent tumour response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>58 patients with colorectal hepatic metastases received SIRT. All had pre-treatment MAA planar images and CT scans which were retrospectively reviewed. Tumours were qualitatively considered \"cold\", \"equivocal\" or \"hot\" based on MAA uptake and the ratio of uptake in tumour and normal liver tissue was calculated (TNR). Following SIRT (which included the administration of hepatic arterial Angiotensin 2) tumour response was assessed by CEA changes one to two months after treatment and by serial CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Uptake was classified as \"hot\" in 37 patients (Group 1) and \"equivocal\" or \"cold\" in 21 (Group 2). CEA levels fell dramatically in over 90% of patients. The falls were not significantly different between the groups. There was no correlation between TNR and tumour response based on CEA changes (r2 = 0.004). CT responses after 3 months were not different in the 2 Groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pattern of MAA uptake by colorectal liver tumours after arterial injection is not a predictor of tumour response after treatment by SIRT. The results suggest the doses of 90Y microspheres used may be greater than is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":80684,"journal":{"name":"BMC nuclear medicine","volume":"5 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1471-2385-5-7","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2385-5-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

Background: SIRT is an emerging treatment for liver tumours which relies on the selective uptake by tumour of 90Y microspheres following hepatic arterial injection. Response rates of around 90% are reported. Hepatic arterial injection of MAA gives an indication of the expected distribution of 90Y microspheres within the liver. This study sought to determine if the MAA scan could be predictive of subsequent tumour response.

Methods: 58 patients with colorectal hepatic metastases received SIRT. All had pre-treatment MAA planar images and CT scans which were retrospectively reviewed. Tumours were qualitatively considered "cold", "equivocal" or "hot" based on MAA uptake and the ratio of uptake in tumour and normal liver tissue was calculated (TNR). Following SIRT (which included the administration of hepatic arterial Angiotensin 2) tumour response was assessed by CEA changes one to two months after treatment and by serial CT.

Results: Uptake was classified as "hot" in 37 patients (Group 1) and "equivocal" or "cold" in 21 (Group 2). CEA levels fell dramatically in over 90% of patients. The falls were not significantly different between the groups. There was no correlation between TNR and tumour response based on CEA changes (r2 = 0.004). CT responses after 3 months were not different in the 2 Groups.

Conclusion: The pattern of MAA uptake by colorectal liver tumours after arterial injection is not a predictor of tumour response after treatment by SIRT. The results suggest the doses of 90Y microspheres used may be greater than is necessary.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠肝转移瘤摄取99mTc-MAA与选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)后反应的关系
背景:SIRT是一种新兴的肝肿瘤治疗方法,它依赖于肝动脉注射后肿瘤对90Y微球的选择性摄取。报告的应答率约为90%。肝动脉注射MAA可指示90Y微球在肝脏内的预期分布。本研究旨在确定MAA扫描是否可以预测随后的肿瘤反应。方法:58例结肝转移患者接受SIRT治疗。所有患者均有治疗前的MAA平面图像和CT扫描。根据MAA的摄取,将肿瘤定性为“冷”、“模糊”或“热”,并计算肿瘤与正常肝组织的摄取比(TNR)。在SIRT(包括给予肝动脉血管紧张素2)后,通过治疗后一至两个月的CEA变化和连续CT评估肿瘤反应。结果:37例患者(第1组)摄取为“热”,21例患者(第2组)摄取为“模糊”或“冷”。超过90%的患者CEA水平急剧下降。两组之间的落差没有显著差异。基于CEA变化的TNR与肿瘤反应无相关性(r2 = 0.004)。3个月后两组CT反应无明显差异。结论:结直肠肝肿瘤动脉注射后MAA摄取模式并不能预测SIRT治疗后肿瘤的反应。结果表明,使用的90Y微球剂量可能大于必要的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computer-assisted lateralization of unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy using Z-score parametric F-18 FDG PET images. Comparison of 2D, 3D high dose and 3D low dose gated myocardial 82Rb PET imaging. Toxicology evaluation of radiotracer doses of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) for human PET imaging: Laboratory analysis of serial blood samples and comparison to previously investigated therapeutic FLT doses. Comparison of manual and semi-automated delineation of regions of interest for radioligand PET imaging analysis. Variation in heart rate influences the assessment of transient ischemic dilation in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1