Decision making under uncertainty in a decision support system for the Red River

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Environmental Modelling & Software Pub Date : 2007-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.014
Inge A.T. de Kort, Martijn J. Booij
{"title":"Decision making under uncertainty in a decision support system for the Red River","authors":"Inge A.T. de Kort,&nbsp;Martijn J. Booij","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Decision support systems (DSSs) are increasingly being used in water management for the evaluation of impacts of policy measures under different scenarios. The exact impacts generally are unknown and surrounded with considerable uncertainties. It may therefore be difficult to make a selection of measures relevant for a particular water management problem. In order to support policy makers to make a strategic selection between different measures in a DSS while taking uncertainty into account, a methodology for the ranking of measures has been developed. The methodology has been applied to a pilot DSS for flood control in the Red River basin in Vietnam and China. The decision variable is the total flood damage and possible flood reducing measures are </span>dike<span> heightening, reforestation and the construction of a retention basin. The methodology consists of a Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis employing Latin Hypercube Sampling and a ranking procedure based on the significance of the difference between output distributions for different measures. The mean flood damage in the base situation is about 2.2 billion US$ for the year 1996 with a standard deviation due to parameter uncertainty of about 1 billion US$. Selected applications of the measures reforestation, dike heightening and the construction of a retention basin reduce the flood damage by about 5, 55 and 300 million US$, respectively. The construction of a retention basin significantly reduces flood damage in the Red River basin, while dike heightening and reforestation reduce flood damage, but not significantly.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":310,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 128-136"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.014","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Modelling & Software","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815205001738","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

Decision support systems (DSSs) are increasingly being used in water management for the evaluation of impacts of policy measures under different scenarios. The exact impacts generally are unknown and surrounded with considerable uncertainties. It may therefore be difficult to make a selection of measures relevant for a particular water management problem. In order to support policy makers to make a strategic selection between different measures in a DSS while taking uncertainty into account, a methodology for the ranking of measures has been developed. The methodology has been applied to a pilot DSS for flood control in the Red River basin in Vietnam and China. The decision variable is the total flood damage and possible flood reducing measures are dike heightening, reforestation and the construction of a retention basin. The methodology consists of a Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis employing Latin Hypercube Sampling and a ranking procedure based on the significance of the difference between output distributions for different measures. The mean flood damage in the base situation is about 2.2 billion US$ for the year 1996 with a standard deviation due to parameter uncertainty of about 1 billion US$. Selected applications of the measures reforestation, dike heightening and the construction of a retention basin reduce the flood damage by about 5, 55 and 300 million US$, respectively. The construction of a retention basin significantly reduces flood damage in the Red River basin, while dike heightening and reforestation reduce flood damage, but not significantly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红河项目决策支持系统的不确定性决策
决策支持系统(DSSs)越来越多地用于水管理,以评估不同情景下政策措施的影响。确切的影响通常是未知的,周围有相当大的不确定性。因此,可能很难选择与某一特定水管理问题有关的措施。为了支持决策者在考虑到不确定性的情况下,在发展支助事务的不同措施之间作出战略性选择,已经制定了一种对措施进行排名的方法。该方法已应用于越南和中国红河流域的防洪决策支持系统试点项目。决策变量为洪涝灾害总量,可能的减洪措施为加高堤防、植树造林和建设截流流域。该方法包括采用拉丁超立方采样的蒙特卡罗不确定性分析和基于不同度量的输出分布之间差异的显著性的排序程序。1996年基本情况下的平均洪水损失约为22亿美元,由于参数的不确定性,其标准偏差约为10亿美元。重新造林、加高堤防和建设涵蓄流域等措施的选择性应用分别减少了约55,55,3亿美元的洪水损失。在红河流域,拦河坝的建设显著降低了洪涝灾害,而加高堤防和植树造林对洪涝灾害的影响不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Modelling & Software
Environmental Modelling & Software 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
241
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Modelling & Software publishes contributions, in the form of research articles, reviews and short communications, on recent advances in environmental modelling and/or software. The aim is to improve our capacity to represent, understand, predict or manage the behaviour of environmental systems at all practical scales, and to communicate those improvements to a wide scientific and professional audience.
期刊最新文献
A hybrid intelligence approach to predicting and explaining land use and land cover change using Bayesian classifiers A review of tools and resources to support Decision-Making Under Deep Uncertainty Seamless hourly PM2.5 mapping across China with a graph spatiotemporal deep neural network Advancing participatory decision support system in water management: An agent-based model for socially-informed collective allocation MAformer: A multivariate prediction framework with adaptive multi-scale decomposition and phase correction for water quality in aquaculture environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1