The efficacy of two brief intervention strategies among injured, at-risk drinkers in the emergency department: impact of tailored messaging and brief advice.

Frederic C Blow, Kristen L Barry, Maureen A Walton, Ronald F Maio, Stephen T Chermack, C Raymond Bingham, Rosalinda V Ignacio, Victor J Strecher
{"title":"The efficacy of two brief intervention strategies among injured, at-risk drinkers in the emergency department: impact of tailored messaging and brief advice.","authors":"Frederic C Blow,&nbsp;Kristen L Barry,&nbsp;Maureen A Walton,&nbsp;Ronald F Maio,&nbsp;Stephen T Chermack,&nbsp;C Raymond Bingham,&nbsp;Rosalinda V Ignacio,&nbsp;Victor J Strecher","doi":"10.15288/jsa.2006.67.568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study used a randomized controlled trial design to compare the effectiveness of four interventions at reducing alcohol consumption, consequences, and heavy episodic drinking among injured, at-risk drinkers in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Injured patients (n=4,476) completed a computerized survey; 575 at- risk drinkers were randomly assigned to one of four intervention conditions: tailored message booklet with brief advice, tailored message booklet only, generic message booklet with brief advice, and generic message booklet only. Regression models using the generalized estimating equation approach were constructed comparing the intervention conditions at baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. Gender and age were entered in models along with their interaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each of the intervention groups significantly decreased their alcohol consumption from baseline to 12-month follow-up; subjects in the tailored message booklet with brief advice group significantly decreased their average weekly alcohol consumption by 48.5% (p<.0001). Those in the brief advice conditions (tailored or generic) significantly decreased their average consumption during the 12 months of the study compared with the no brief advice conditions. Younger adult women (ages 19-22) who received some brief advice were the most likely to decrease their heavy episodic drinking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This was the first large-scale, brief intervention trial that included development and testing of computerized, highly tailored interventions with injured drinkers in the ED. ED-based interventions for alcohol problems would benefit from computerized screening, brief advice, and booklets to positively impact risky drinking practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":17092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol","volume":"67 4","pages":"568-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.568","citationCount":"117","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 117

Abstract

Objective: This study used a randomized controlled trial design to compare the effectiveness of four interventions at reducing alcohol consumption, consequences, and heavy episodic drinking among injured, at-risk drinkers in the emergency department (ED).

Method: Injured patients (n=4,476) completed a computerized survey; 575 at- risk drinkers were randomly assigned to one of four intervention conditions: tailored message booklet with brief advice, tailored message booklet only, generic message booklet with brief advice, and generic message booklet only. Regression models using the generalized estimating equation approach were constructed comparing the intervention conditions at baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. Gender and age were entered in models along with their interaction.

Results: Each of the intervention groups significantly decreased their alcohol consumption from baseline to 12-month follow-up; subjects in the tailored message booklet with brief advice group significantly decreased their average weekly alcohol consumption by 48.5% (p<.0001). Those in the brief advice conditions (tailored or generic) significantly decreased their average consumption during the 12 months of the study compared with the no brief advice conditions. Younger adult women (ages 19-22) who received some brief advice were the most likely to decrease their heavy episodic drinking.

Conclusions: This was the first large-scale, brief intervention trial that included development and testing of computerized, highly tailored interventions with injured drinkers in the ED. ED-based interventions for alcohol problems would benefit from computerized screening, brief advice, and booklets to positively impact risky drinking practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种简短的干预策略对急诊科受伤、高危饮酒者的效果:量身定制的信息和简短建议的影响。
目的:本研究采用随机对照试验设计,比较四种干预措施在减少急诊科(ED)受伤高危饮酒者的酒精消费、后果和重度间歇性饮酒方面的有效性。方法:对4476例受伤患者进行计算机化调查;575名高危饮酒者被随机分配到四种干预条件中的一种:有简短建议的定制信息小册子、只有定制信息小册子、有简短建议的通用信息小册子和只有通用信息小册子。采用广义估计方程方法建立回归模型,比较基线、3个月随访和12个月随访时的干预情况。性别和年龄连同他们的互动一起被输入模型。结果:从基线到12个月的随访,每个干预组的饮酒量都显著减少;结论:这是第一次大规模的、简短的干预试验,包括对ED中受伤的饮酒者进行计算机化的、高度定制的干预的开发和测试。基于ED的酒精问题干预将受益于计算机化的筛查、简短的建议和小册子,以积极影响危险的饮酒行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy scale. Premenstrual symptomatology, alcohol consumption, and family history of alcoholism in women with premenstrual syndrome. Alcohol consumption and symptoms of depression in young adults from 20 countries. An evaluation of the performance of the self-rating of the effects of alcohol questionnaire in 12- and 35-year-old subjects. Memory and perseveration on a win-stay, lose-shift task in rats exposed neonatally to alcohol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1