Evaluation of MLPA for the detection of cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements

Sandra Monfort , Carmen Orellana , Silvestre Oltra , Mónica RosellÓ , Miriam Guitart , Francisco Martínez
{"title":"Evaluation of MLPA for the detection of cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements","authors":"Sandra Monfort ,&nbsp;Carmen Orellana ,&nbsp;Silvestre Oltra ,&nbsp;Mónica RosellÓ ,&nbsp;Miriam Guitart ,&nbsp;Francisco Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.lab.2006.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chromosomal rearrangements involving the telomeres are implied as a significant cause of idiopathic mental retardation. The most frequently used technique to detect these rearrangements was fluorescent <em>in situ</em> hybridization (FISH), an expensive and labor-intensive technique. One of the most promising alternative techniques is multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Here, the authors present the evaluation of a double set of probes (the SALSA P036, P019, and P020 human telomere test kits) on a series of 95 patients and 22 normal controls. Overall, 34 patients had been studied by telomeric FISH and MLPA, which was demonstrated to be a reliable method to detect essentially all subtelomeric rearrangements characterized by FISH. In addition, in these 34 patients, 13 dose imbalances were detected by MLPA, but not by FISH analysis. Overall, 12 alterations were observed only with one of the two sets, and they corresponded to polymorphic variants, as they were inherited from healthy parents or also appear in normal controls. The remaining 61 patients were initially studied with SALSA P036, and any putative dose alteration was confirmed with the two other kits and FISH. In the whole series, the authors found 9 dose imbalances evidenced with 2 MLPA kits and confirmed by FISH, representing 10% of patients with subtelomeric rearrangements. On the other hand, one small duplication at 14q11 may be clinically relevant as it appears <em>de novo</em> in one patient. In conclusion, MLPA can be considered a quick, sensitive, cost-effective, and easy method to screen for subtelomeric rearrangements, but any finding based in the testing of one probe should be confirmed by other sources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","volume":"147 6","pages":"Pages 295-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lab.2006.01.006","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022214306001077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements involving the telomeres are implied as a significant cause of idiopathic mental retardation. The most frequently used technique to detect these rearrangements was fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), an expensive and labor-intensive technique. One of the most promising alternative techniques is multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Here, the authors present the evaluation of a double set of probes (the SALSA P036, P019, and P020 human telomere test kits) on a series of 95 patients and 22 normal controls. Overall, 34 patients had been studied by telomeric FISH and MLPA, which was demonstrated to be a reliable method to detect essentially all subtelomeric rearrangements characterized by FISH. In addition, in these 34 patients, 13 dose imbalances were detected by MLPA, but not by FISH analysis. Overall, 12 alterations were observed only with one of the two sets, and they corresponded to polymorphic variants, as they were inherited from healthy parents or also appear in normal controls. The remaining 61 patients were initially studied with SALSA P036, and any putative dose alteration was confirmed with the two other kits and FISH. In the whole series, the authors found 9 dose imbalances evidenced with 2 MLPA kits and confirmed by FISH, representing 10% of patients with subtelomeric rearrangements. On the other hand, one small duplication at 14q11 may be clinically relevant as it appears de novo in one patient. In conclusion, MLPA can be considered a quick, sensitive, cost-effective, and easy method to screen for subtelomeric rearrangements, but any finding based in the testing of one probe should be confirmed by other sources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MLPA检测隐性亚端粒重排的评价
涉及端粒的染色体重排被认为是特发性智力迟钝的重要原因。检测这些重排最常用的技术是荧光原位杂交(FISH),这是一种昂贵且劳动密集型的技术。其中最有前途的替代技术是多路连接相关探针放大(MLPA)。在这里,作者介绍了一套双探针(SALSA P036, P019和P020人类端粒检测试剂盒)对95名患者和22名正常对照的评估。总的来说,34例患者已经通过端粒FISH和MLPA进行了研究,这被证明是一种可靠的方法,基本上可以检测到所有由FISH表征的亚端粒重排。此外,在这34例患者中,MLPA检测到13例剂量不平衡,但FISH分析未检测到。总的来说,仅在两组中的一组中观察到12个改变,它们对应于多态变异,因为它们遗传自健康的父母或也出现在正常对照中。其余61例患者最初使用SALSA P036进行研究,并使用另外两种试剂盒和FISH确认任何假定的剂量改变。在整个系列中,作者发现了9个剂量不平衡,由2个MLPA试剂盒证实,并由FISH证实,占亚端粒重排患者的10%。另一方面,14q11的一个小重复可能与临床相关,因为它在一个患者中出现了新生。总之,MLPA可以被认为是一种快速、灵敏、经济、简便的筛选亚端粒重排的方法,但任何基于一个探针检测的发现都应该得到其他来源的证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Instructions to authors Masthead Contents Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1