Usefulness of an Internet-based thematic learning network: comparison of effectiveness with traditional teaching.

María Jesús Coma Del Corral, José Cordero Guevara, Pedro Abáigar Luquin, Horacio J Peña, Juan José Mateos Otero
{"title":"Usefulness of an Internet-based thematic learning network: comparison of effectiveness with traditional teaching.","authors":"María Jesús Coma Del Corral,&nbsp;José Cordero Guevara,&nbsp;Pedro Abáigar Luquin,&nbsp;Horacio J Peña,&nbsp;Juan José Mateos Otero","doi":"10.1080/14639230600598026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>UniNet is an Internet-based thematic network for a virtual community of users (VCU). It supports one multidisciplinary community of doctoral students, who receive most of the courses on the network. The evident advantages of distance learning by Internet, in terms of costs, comfort, etc., require a previous evaluation of the system, focusing on the learning outcomes of the student. The aim was to evaluate the real learning of the students of doctorate courses, by comparing the effectiveness of distance learning in UniNet with traditional classroom-based teaching. Five doctorate courses were taught simultaneously to two independent groups of students in two ways: one, through the UniNet Network, and the other in a traditional classroom. The academic knowledge of students was evaluated at the beginning and end of each course. The difference in score was considered as a knowledge increase. The comparison was made using Student's t-test for independent groups. There were no significant statistical differences in the outcomes of the two groups of students. This suggests that both teaching systems were equivalent in increasing the knowledge of the students. Both educational methods, the traditional system and the online system in a thematic network, are effective and similar for increasing knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":80069,"journal":{"name":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"59-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14639230600598026","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230600598026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

UniNet is an Internet-based thematic network for a virtual community of users (VCU). It supports one multidisciplinary community of doctoral students, who receive most of the courses on the network. The evident advantages of distance learning by Internet, in terms of costs, comfort, etc., require a previous evaluation of the system, focusing on the learning outcomes of the student. The aim was to evaluate the real learning of the students of doctorate courses, by comparing the effectiveness of distance learning in UniNet with traditional classroom-based teaching. Five doctorate courses were taught simultaneously to two independent groups of students in two ways: one, through the UniNet Network, and the other in a traditional classroom. The academic knowledge of students was evaluated at the beginning and end of each course. The difference in score was considered as a knowledge increase. The comparison was made using Student's t-test for independent groups. There were no significant statistical differences in the outcomes of the two groups of students. This suggests that both teaching systems were equivalent in increasing the knowledge of the students. Both educational methods, the traditional system and the online system in a thematic network, are effective and similar for increasing knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于互联网的专题学习网络的有效性:与传统教学的有效性比较。
UniNet是一个基于internet的主题网络,用于虚拟用户社区(VCU)。它支持一个多学科博士生社区,他们在网络上接受大部分课程。互联网远程学习在成本、舒适度等方面的明显优势要求对系统进行预先评估,重点关注学生的学习成果。目的是通过比较UniNet远程学习与传统课堂教学的有效性,评估博士课程学生的实际学习情况。五门博士课程以两种方式同时教授给两组独立的学生:一种是通过UniNet网络,另一种是在传统的教室里。在每门课程的开始和结束时对学生的学术知识进行评估。分数的差异被认为是知识的增加。使用独立组的学生t检验进行比较。两组学生的成绩差异无统计学意义。这表明两种教学体系在增加学生知识方面是相同的。传统系统和主题网络中的在线系统这两种教育方法对于知识的增长都是有效的和相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICT-based health information services for elderly people: past experiences, current trends, and future strategies. Readability and cultural sensitivity of web-based patient decision aids for cancer screening and treatment: a systematic review. Digital pens and pain diaries in palliative home health care: professional caregivers' experiences. Assisting the transition from hospital to home for children with major congenital heart disease by telemedicine: a feasibility study and initial results. Patients' perceptions of Internet usage and their opportunity to obtain health information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1