Owning a piece of the Doc: State law restraints on lay ownership of healthcare enterprises.

Journal of health law Pub Date : 2006-01-01
Andrew Fichter
{"title":"Owning a piece of the Doc: State law restraints on lay ownership of healthcare enterprises.","authors":"Andrew Fichter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Article provides an analytical framework for assessing state regulation regarding lay ownership of healthcare entities. The author suggests there are three categories of state regulation restraining lay ownership, each focused on a particular stakeholder in healthcare transactions: provider, patient, and payor. These regulatory paradigms are analyzed through a discussion of three state approaches (California, Illinois, and Florida), each exemplifying a particular stakeholder schema. The Article then highlights shortcomings of the three schemas, pointing out formal frustrations, application inequities, and doctrinal flaws. The author concludes that any successful state regulation of lay ownership in healthcare should incorporate aspects of all approaches in pursuit of accommodating the needs of all three stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":80027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health law","volume":"39 1","pages":"1-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Article provides an analytical framework for assessing state regulation regarding lay ownership of healthcare entities. The author suggests there are three categories of state regulation restraining lay ownership, each focused on a particular stakeholder in healthcare transactions: provider, patient, and payor. These regulatory paradigms are analyzed through a discussion of three state approaches (California, Illinois, and Florida), each exemplifying a particular stakeholder schema. The Article then highlights shortcomings of the three schemas, pointing out formal frustrations, application inequities, and doctrinal flaws. The author concludes that any successful state regulation of lay ownership in healthcare should incorporate aspects of all approaches in pursuit of accommodating the needs of all three stakeholders.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥有医生的一部分:国家法律限制医疗保健企业的非专业人员所有权。
本文提供了一个分析框架,用于评估有关医疗保健实体非专业人员所有权的国家法规。作者建议有三类限制非专业所有权的国家法规,每一类都侧重于医疗保健交易中的特定利益相关者:提供者、患者和付款人。通过对三个州的方法(加利福尼亚、伊利诺伊和佛罗里达)的讨论来分析这些监管范式,每个州都举例说明了一个特定的利益相关者模式。然后,本文强调了这三种模式的缺点,指出了形式上的挫折、应用程序的不平等和理论上的缺陷。作者的结论是,任何成功的国家监管非专业所有权的医疗保健应纳入所有方面的方法,以满足所有三个利益相关者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Necessity of Establishing a ROK Armed Forces Institutional Review Board Ethical and Legal Issues on Human Brain Organoid Introduction of the National R&D Innovation Act and Research Ethics in Korea Examination of the Principle of Proportionality for the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Suggestions on Revision Regarding Abortion Laws in Korea: an Empirical Study Using Qualitative Research Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1