The clinical trial research participant as an inside trader: a legal and policy analysis.

Journal of health law Pub Date : 2006-01-01
Allan Horwich
{"title":"The clinical trial research participant as an inside trader: a legal and policy analysis.","authors":"Allan Horwich","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Article examines whether a participant in a clinical research trial for a drug obtains material nonpublic information about the drug and its manufacturer or licensor and, if so, whether the participant may lawfully trade securities based on that information. This issue has been noted but not examined in depth in several articles in recent years. After an introduction to the federal law of insider trading and a discussion of relevant aspects of a supervised research trial, the Article concludes that, absent an agreement to the contrary, the participant would be free to trade securities based on any material nonpublic information learned in the trial. The author evaluates the extent to which the information is material and nonpublic and then presents the policy issues surrounding whetherthe participantshould be precluded from trading when in possession of material nonpublic information gained as a result of participation in the trial. While not resolving the competing policy considerations, including the value of allowing participants to make disclosure of their experiences in the trial before publication of the results in a peer reviewed journal, the Article presents an approach for preventing the misuse of material nonpublic information gained in the clinical trial context, by obtaining an agreement from the participant, and an agreement from the limited circle of persons to whom the participant should be allowed to make disclosure in any event (such as his personal physician and family members), that would render any trading by them unlawful under the federal law of insider trading.</p>","PeriodicalId":80027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Article examines whether a participant in a clinical research trial for a drug obtains material nonpublic information about the drug and its manufacturer or licensor and, if so, whether the participant may lawfully trade securities based on that information. This issue has been noted but not examined in depth in several articles in recent years. After an introduction to the federal law of insider trading and a discussion of relevant aspects of a supervised research trial, the Article concludes that, absent an agreement to the contrary, the participant would be free to trade securities based on any material nonpublic information learned in the trial. The author evaluates the extent to which the information is material and nonpublic and then presents the policy issues surrounding whetherthe participantshould be precluded from trading when in possession of material nonpublic information gained as a result of participation in the trial. While not resolving the competing policy considerations, including the value of allowing participants to make disclosure of their experiences in the trial before publication of the results in a peer reviewed journal, the Article presents an approach for preventing the misuse of material nonpublic information gained in the clinical trial context, by obtaining an agreement from the participant, and an agreement from the limited circle of persons to whom the participant should be allowed to make disclosure in any event (such as his personal physician and family members), that would render any trading by them unlawful under the federal law of insider trading.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床试验研究参与者作为内幕交易者:法律与政策分析。
本文审查药物临床研究试验的参与者是否获得了有关该药物及其制造商或许可方的重要非公开信息,如果是这样,参与者是否可以合法地根据该信息进行证券交易。近年来,有几篇文章提到了这个问题,但没有深入研究。在介绍了内幕交易的联邦法律并讨论了监督研究审判的相关方面之后,该条款得出结论,在没有相反协议的情况下,参与者可以根据在审判中了解到的任何重要非公开信息自由交易证券。作者评估了信息是实质性的和非公开的程度,然后提出了政策问题,围绕参与者是否应该被排除在拥有作为参与试验的结果而获得的实质性非公开信息时进行交易。虽然没有解决相互竞争的政策考虑,包括允许参与者在结果发表在同行评审期刊之前披露他们在试验中的经验的价值,但本文提出了一种防止滥用临床试验背景下获得的重要非公开信息的方法,即获得参与者的同意。在任何情况下,参与者都应该被允许向有限的人(比如他的私人医生和家庭成员)披露信息,这将使他们的任何交易在联邦内幕交易法下都是非法的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Necessity of Establishing a ROK Armed Forces Institutional Review Board Ethical and Legal Issues on Human Brain Organoid Introduction of the National R&D Innovation Act and Research Ethics in Korea Examination of the Principle of Proportionality for the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Suggestions on Revision Regarding Abortion Laws in Korea: an Empirical Study Using Qualitative Research Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1