Recent clinical trials of surfactant treatment for neonates.

Biology of the neonate Pub Date : 2006-01-01 Epub Date: 2006-06-01 DOI:10.1159/000092869
Henry L Halliday
{"title":"Recent clinical trials of surfactant treatment for neonates.","authors":"Henry L Halliday","doi":"10.1159/000092869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To search for recent clinical trials of neonatal surfactant treatment and report their findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recent was defined as published between 2000 and 2005. An online search on PubMed was made on 30th December 2005 using the following terms: surfactant treatment, clinical trials and neonate, with limits of years 2000 to 2005 and age - newborn from birth to 1 month. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of RCTs were prioritised and studies in children and animals were excluded from further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>175 papers were found in this search. Only about half of these papers were directly related to some aspect of surfactant treatment and of these just over one-half were either RCTs or systematic reviews of RCTs. Of the 34 RCTs of surfactant treatment, 3 were excluded as they involved children or animals rather than neonates. Twenty-nine trials studied preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and 2 were for meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in term infants. The median sample sizes of these studies were RDS (92, range 19-1,361) and MAS (42, range 22-61). Eighteen of the RDS trials compared two or more surfactant preparations, the most frequently studied being Curosurf and Survanta but altogether 11 different surfactants were compared. These new RCTs need to be analysed by meta-analyses in systematic reviews. Twelve systematic reviews were found and these demonstrated the superiority of prophylactic over selective use of surfactant in babies <30 weeks, natural over synthetic surfactant and the absence of an increase in long-term developmental sequelae. Surfactant for MAS may reduce the severity of respiratory illness and the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Of the non-randomised trials' novel delivery methods, failure to use evidence-based guidelines and the benefit of surfactant for babies <25 weeks were the most interesting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surfactant remains one of the most effective and safest interventions in neonatology. Prophylactic natural surfactant seems to be the most evidence-based treatment for babies <30 weeks. Of the newer synthetic surfactants, only Surfaxin has been compared with currently used surfactants and systematic reviews are needed to establish if it has a role in treatment of RDS. The improvement in outcome for babies <25 weeks has been due to a number of interventions: prenatal steroids, prenatal antibiotics and postnatal surfactant. Clinical trials of surfactant replacement in the neonate continue to be published with remarkable frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":9091,"journal":{"name":"Biology of the neonate","volume":"89 4","pages":"323-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000092869","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of the neonate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000092869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2006/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

Objective: To search for recent clinical trials of neonatal surfactant treatment and report their findings.

Methods: Recent was defined as published between 2000 and 2005. An online search on PubMed was made on 30th December 2005 using the following terms: surfactant treatment, clinical trials and neonate, with limits of years 2000 to 2005 and age - newborn from birth to 1 month. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of RCTs were prioritised and studies in children and animals were excluded from further analysis.

Results: 175 papers were found in this search. Only about half of these papers were directly related to some aspect of surfactant treatment and of these just over one-half were either RCTs or systematic reviews of RCTs. Of the 34 RCTs of surfactant treatment, 3 were excluded as they involved children or animals rather than neonates. Twenty-nine trials studied preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and 2 were for meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in term infants. The median sample sizes of these studies were RDS (92, range 19-1,361) and MAS (42, range 22-61). Eighteen of the RDS trials compared two or more surfactant preparations, the most frequently studied being Curosurf and Survanta but altogether 11 different surfactants were compared. These new RCTs need to be analysed by meta-analyses in systematic reviews. Twelve systematic reviews were found and these demonstrated the superiority of prophylactic over selective use of surfactant in babies <30 weeks, natural over synthetic surfactant and the absence of an increase in long-term developmental sequelae. Surfactant for MAS may reduce the severity of respiratory illness and the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Of the non-randomised trials' novel delivery methods, failure to use evidence-based guidelines and the benefit of surfactant for babies <25 weeks were the most interesting.

Conclusions: Surfactant remains one of the most effective and safest interventions in neonatology. Prophylactic natural surfactant seems to be the most evidence-based treatment for babies <30 weeks. Of the newer synthetic surfactants, only Surfaxin has been compared with currently used surfactants and systematic reviews are needed to establish if it has a role in treatment of RDS. The improvement in outcome for babies <25 weeks has been due to a number of interventions: prenatal steroids, prenatal antibiotics and postnatal surfactant. Clinical trials of surfactant replacement in the neonate continue to be published with remarkable frequency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表面活性剂治疗新生儿的最新临床试验。
目的:检索新生儿表面活性剂治疗的临床研究并报道其结果。方法:近期定义为2000 - 2005年间发表的文献。我们于2005年12月30日在PubMed网上搜索了以下词条:表面活性剂治疗、临床试验和新生儿,时间为2000年至2005年,年龄为新生儿从出生到1个月。优先考虑随机临床试验(rct)和rct的系统评价,儿童和动物研究被排除在进一步分析之外。结果:共检索到175篇论文。这些论文中只有大约一半与表面活性剂治疗的某些方面直接相关,其中一半以上是随机对照试验或随机对照试验的系统评价。在34项表面活性剂治疗的随机对照试验中,3项因涉及儿童或动物而非新生儿而被排除。29项研究早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS), 2项研究足月儿胎粪吸入综合征(MAS)。这些研究的中位样本量分别为RDS(92,范围19- 1361)和MAS(42,范围22-61)。18个RDS试验比较了两种或两种以上的表面活性剂制剂,最常被研究的是currosurf和Survanta,但总共比较了11种不同的表面活性剂。这些新的随机对照试验需要在系统评价中进行荟萃分析。结论:表面活性剂仍然是新生儿最有效和最安全的干预措施之一。预防性的天然表面活性剂似乎是最循证的婴儿治疗方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Evaluation of the efficacy and effectiveness of the Spanish security forces
IF 1.3 3区 社会学European Journal of Law and EconomicsPub Date : 2011-07-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10657-011-9265-4
Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, L. Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Javier Parra Domínguez
Public Key Cryptography in Computer and Network Security
IF 0 Democratizing CryptographyPub Date : 2022-08-24 DOI: 10.1145/3549993.3549998
P. Kocher
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neonatal persistent pulmonary hypertension treated with milrinone: four case reports. Early increased levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in neonates recovering from respiratory distress syndrome. Effects of hyaluronan-fortified surfactant in ventilated premature piglets with respiratory distress. Limbs anthropometry of singleton Chinese newborns of 28-42 weeks' gestation. Purine and pyrimidine metabolism and electrocortical brain activity during hypotension in near-term lambs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1