Collaboration and distances between German immunological institutes--a trend analysis.

Frank Havemann, Michael Heinz, Hildrun Kretschmer
{"title":"Collaboration and distances between German immunological institutes--a trend analysis.","authors":"Frank Havemann,&nbsp;Michael Heinz,&nbsp;Hildrun Kretschmer","doi":"10.1186/1747-5333-1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hypothesis that distance matters but that in recent years geographical proximity has become less important for research collaboration was tested. We have chosen a sample--authors at German immunological institutes--that is relatively homogeneous with regard to research field, language and culture, which beside distance are other possible factors influencing the willingness to co-operate. We analyse yearly distributions of co-authorship links between institutes and compare them with the yearly distributions of distances of all institutes producing papers in journals indexed in the Science Citation Index, editions 1992 till 2002. We weight both types of distributions properly with paper numbers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One interesting result is that place matters but if a researcher has to leave the home town to find a collaborator distance does not matter any longer. This result holds for all years considered, but is statistically most significant in 2002. The tendency to leave the own town for collaborators has slightly increased in the sample. In addition, yearly productivity distributions of institutes have been found to be lognormal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Internet did not change much the collaboration patterns between German immunological institutes.</p>","PeriodicalId":87404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1747-5333-1-6","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-1-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Background: The hypothesis that distance matters but that in recent years geographical proximity has become less important for research collaboration was tested. We have chosen a sample--authors at German immunological institutes--that is relatively homogeneous with regard to research field, language and culture, which beside distance are other possible factors influencing the willingness to co-operate. We analyse yearly distributions of co-authorship links between institutes and compare them with the yearly distributions of distances of all institutes producing papers in journals indexed in the Science Citation Index, editions 1992 till 2002. We weight both types of distributions properly with paper numbers.

Results: One interesting result is that place matters but if a researcher has to leave the home town to find a collaborator distance does not matter any longer. This result holds for all years considered, but is statistically most significant in 2002. The tendency to leave the own town for collaborators has slightly increased in the sample. In addition, yearly productivity distributions of institutes have been found to be lognormal.

Conclusion: The Internet did not change much the collaboration patterns between German immunological institutes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国免疫学研究所之间的合作与距离——趋势分析。
背景:距离很重要的假设,但近年来地理邻近对研究合作的重要性已经降低,这一假设得到了检验。我们选择了一个样本——德国免疫学研究所的作者——他们在研究领域、语言和文化方面相对同质,除了距离之外,这些因素也是影响合作意愿的其他可能因素。我们分析了机构之间合作关系的年度分布,并将其与所有在科学引文索引(1992年至2002年版)索引的期刊上发表论文的机构的年度距离分布进行了比较。我们用纸面数字适当地衡量这两种分布。结果:一个有趣的结果是,地点很重要,但如果研究人员不得不离开家乡寻找合作者,距离就不再重要了。这一结果适用于所有年份,但在2002年统计上最为显著。在样本中,离开自己的城市寻找合作者的趋势略有增加。此外,各研究所的年度生产率分布也符合对数正态分布。结论:互联网并没有改变德国免疫学研究所之间的合作模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Two Similarity Metrics for Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): An Aid to Biomedical Text Mining and Author Name Disambiguation. The language of discovery. Bias associated with mining electronic health records. Literature-based Resurrection of Neglected Medical Discoveries. A cognitive task analysis of a visual analytic workflow: Exploring molecular interaction networks in systems biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1