Evaluating Diagnosis and Treatment Patterns of COPD in Primary Care.

Vijay N Joish, Ellen Brady, William Stockdale, Diana I Brixner, Riad Dirani
{"title":"Evaluating Diagnosis and Treatment Patterns of COPD in Primary Care.","authors":"Vijay N Joish,&nbsp;Ellen Brady,&nbsp;William Stockdale,&nbsp;Diana I Brixner,&nbsp;Riad Dirani","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200605040-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many patients with COPD are misdiagnosed or under-treated. The characteristics of COPD patients and the patterns of treatment have not been well characterized in primary care settings. The objective of this study was to identify patterns of COPD onset, diagnosis and treatment with the goal of facilitating appropriate treatment at earlier stages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national electronic medical record database was used to identify patients with at least a 6-month history prior to a diagnosis of COPD (ICD-9 codes 491.xx, 492.xx, and 496). Pulmonary function test (PFT) results closest to the first diagnosis of COPD were evaluated to characterize disease severity using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Prescription data were evaluated at the time of diagnosis. All descriptive statistics were conducted using STATA statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 691 patients met the study criteria. Prescription data were available for 9354 (64%) of these patients. Of this group, only slightly over 50% (n = 5264) had a respiratory-related prescription on the date of diagnosis. For those not having a respiratory drug at the time of diagnosis, the average time between diagnosis and the first respiratory-related prescription was 106 (SD +/- 256.4) days. Only 389 (<3%) patients had any PFT data recorded on or prior to the day of their first diagnosis of COPD, and only 273 (2%) had sufficient PFT data available to determine their GOLD severity class. The average time between diagnosis and first COPD prescription was greatest for patients in the lowest severity category (Class 0/I; 163 +/- 288.2 days), and smallest for patients in the highest severity category (Class IV; 124 +/- 152.3 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>COPD is often not diagnosed or treated until the later stages of disease, and spirometry is not used routinely to diagnose, stage or guide treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"5 4","pages":"283-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605040-00006","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605040-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Objective: Many patients with COPD are misdiagnosed or under-treated. The characteristics of COPD patients and the patterns of treatment have not been well characterized in primary care settings. The objective of this study was to identify patterns of COPD onset, diagnosis and treatment with the goal of facilitating appropriate treatment at earlier stages.

Methods: A national electronic medical record database was used to identify patients with at least a 6-month history prior to a diagnosis of COPD (ICD-9 codes 491.xx, 492.xx, and 496). Pulmonary function test (PFT) results closest to the first diagnosis of COPD were evaluated to characterize disease severity using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Prescription data were evaluated at the time of diagnosis. All descriptive statistics were conducted using STATA statistical software.

Results: A total of 14 691 patients met the study criteria. Prescription data were available for 9354 (64%) of these patients. Of this group, only slightly over 50% (n = 5264) had a respiratory-related prescription on the date of diagnosis. For those not having a respiratory drug at the time of diagnosis, the average time between diagnosis and the first respiratory-related prescription was 106 (SD +/- 256.4) days. Only 389 (<3%) patients had any PFT data recorded on or prior to the day of their first diagnosis of COPD, and only 273 (2%) had sufficient PFT data available to determine their GOLD severity class. The average time between diagnosis and first COPD prescription was greatest for patients in the lowest severity category (Class 0/I; 163 +/- 288.2 days), and smallest for patients in the highest severity category (Class IV; 124 +/- 152.3 days).

Conclusion: COPD is often not diagnosed or treated until the later stages of disease, and spirometry is not used routinely to diagnose, stage or guide treatment decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估COPD在初级保健中的诊断和治疗模式。
目的:许多慢性阻塞性肺病患者被误诊或治疗不足。慢性阻塞性肺病患者的特点和治疗模式在初级保健机构尚未得到很好的描述。本研究的目的是确定COPD的发病、诊断和治疗模式,以便在早期阶段进行适当的治疗。方法:使用国家电子病历数据库来识别诊断为COPD (ICD-9代码491)之前至少有6个月病史的患者。xx, 492年。Xx和496)。使用全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)标准对最接近首次诊断COPD的肺功能检查(PFT)结果进行评估,以表征疾病严重程度。在诊断时评估处方数据。所有描述性统计均采用STATA统计软件进行。结果:共有14691例患者符合研究标准。其中9354例(64%)患者可获得处方资料。在这一组中,只有略高于50% (n = 5264)的患者在诊断之日有呼吸相关的处方。对于那些在诊断时没有呼吸药物的患者,从诊断到第一次呼吸相关处方的平均时间为106 (SD +/- 256.4)天。结论:COPD通常直到疾病晚期才被诊断或治疗,肺活量测定法并没有常规用于诊断、分期或指导治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Nosocomial pneumonia : rationalizing the approach to empirical therapy. Managing asthma in expectant mothers. New strategies for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease : the rationale for arginine therapy. Antioxidant strategies in respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1