Is fructose the optimal low glycemic index sweetener?

John P Bantle
{"title":"Is fructose the optimal low glycemic index sweetener?","authors":"John P Bantle","doi":"10.1159/000094427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fructose is a monosaccharide which is abundant in nature. It is the sweetest naturally occurring carbohydrate. The availability of fructose increased substantially when it became possible in the 1960s to economically produce high fructose syrups from corn starch and other starches. Such high fructose syrups are now used to sweeten soft drinks, fruit drinks, baked goods, jams, syrups and candies. The most recent data available suggest that fructose consumption is increasing worldwide. Fructose presently accounts for about 10% of average total energy intake in the United States. Studies in both healthy and diabetic subjects demonstrated that fructose produced a smaller postprandial rise in plasma glucose and serum insulin than other common carbohydrates. Substitution of dietary fructose for other carbohydrates produced a 13% reduction in mean plasma glucose in a study of type-1 and type-2 diabetic subjects. However, there is concern that fructose may aggravate lipemia, particularly in men. In one study, daylong plasma triglycerides (estimated by determining the area under response curves) in healthy men was 32% greater during a high fructose diet than during a high glucose diet. There is also concern that fructose may be a factor contributing to the growing worldwide prevalence of obesity. Increasing fructose consumption is temporally associated with the increase in obesity. Moreover, on theoretical grounds, dietary fructose might increase energy intake. Fructose stimulates insulin secretion less than does glucose and glucose-containing carbohydrates. Since insulin increases leptin release, lower circulating insulin and leptin after fructose ingestion might inhibit appetite less than consumption of other carbohydrates and lead to increased energy intake. However, there is not yet any convincing experimental evidence that dietary fructose does increase energy intake. Although evidence that fructose has adverse effects is limited, adding fructose in large amounts to the diet may be undesirable, particularly for men. Fructose that occurs naturally in fruits and vegetables is a modest component of energy intake and should not be of concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":18989,"journal":{"name":"Nestle Nutrition workshop series. Clinical & performance programme","volume":"11 ","pages":"83-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000094427","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nestle Nutrition workshop series. Clinical & performance programme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000094427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Fructose is a monosaccharide which is abundant in nature. It is the sweetest naturally occurring carbohydrate. The availability of fructose increased substantially when it became possible in the 1960s to economically produce high fructose syrups from corn starch and other starches. Such high fructose syrups are now used to sweeten soft drinks, fruit drinks, baked goods, jams, syrups and candies. The most recent data available suggest that fructose consumption is increasing worldwide. Fructose presently accounts for about 10% of average total energy intake in the United States. Studies in both healthy and diabetic subjects demonstrated that fructose produced a smaller postprandial rise in plasma glucose and serum insulin than other common carbohydrates. Substitution of dietary fructose for other carbohydrates produced a 13% reduction in mean plasma glucose in a study of type-1 and type-2 diabetic subjects. However, there is concern that fructose may aggravate lipemia, particularly in men. In one study, daylong plasma triglycerides (estimated by determining the area under response curves) in healthy men was 32% greater during a high fructose diet than during a high glucose diet. There is also concern that fructose may be a factor contributing to the growing worldwide prevalence of obesity. Increasing fructose consumption is temporally associated with the increase in obesity. Moreover, on theoretical grounds, dietary fructose might increase energy intake. Fructose stimulates insulin secretion less than does glucose and glucose-containing carbohydrates. Since insulin increases leptin release, lower circulating insulin and leptin after fructose ingestion might inhibit appetite less than consumption of other carbohydrates and lead to increased energy intake. However, there is not yet any convincing experimental evidence that dietary fructose does increase energy intake. Although evidence that fructose has adverse effects is limited, adding fructose in large amounts to the diet may be undesirable, particularly for men. Fructose that occurs naturally in fruits and vegetables is a modest component of energy intake and should not be of concern.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
果糖是最佳的低血糖指数甜味剂吗?
果糖是一种在自然界中含量丰富的单糖。它是最甜的天然碳水化合物。当20世纪60年代从玉米淀粉和其他淀粉中经济地生产高果糖糖浆成为可能时,果糖的可用性大大增加。这种高果糖糖浆现在被用来给软饮料、果汁饮料、烘焙食品、果酱、糖浆和糖果增甜。最新的数据表明,果糖的消费量在世界范围内正在增加。果糖目前约占美国平均总能量摄入的10%。对健康和糖尿病受试者的研究表明,与其他常见碳水化合物相比,果糖产生的餐后血糖和血清胰岛素升高较小。在一项对1型和2型糖尿病受试者的研究中,用膳食果糖代替其他碳水化合物可使平均血浆葡萄糖降低13%。然而,果糖可能会加重血脂症,尤其是男性。在一项研究中,健康男性的全天血浆甘油三酯(通过测定反应曲线下的面积来估计)在高果糖饮食中比在高葡萄糖饮食中高出32%。还有人担心果糖可能是导致全球肥胖患病率上升的一个因素。果糖摄入量的增加暂时与肥胖的增加有关。此外,从理论上讲,膳食果糖可能会增加能量摄入。果糖对胰岛素分泌的刺激小于葡萄糖和含葡萄糖的碳水化合物。由于胰岛素增加瘦素的释放,果糖摄入后循环胰岛素和瘦素的降低可能比摄入其他碳水化合物更能抑制食欲,导致能量摄入增加。然而,目前还没有任何令人信服的实验证据表明膳食果糖确实会增加能量摄入。尽管果糖有不良影响的证据有限,但在饮食中大量添加果糖可能是不可取的,尤其是对男性。水果和蔬菜中天然存在的果糖是能量摄入的适度组成部分,不应该担心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The magnitude of the problem of malnutrition in Europe. Malnutrition in North America: where have we been? Where are we going? The economics of malnutrition. The need for consistent criteria for identifying malnutrition. Enteral nutrition reimbursement - the rationale for the policy: the US perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1