Does cumulating endurance training at the weekends impair training effectiveness?

Tim Meyer, Markus Auracher, Katrin Heeg, Axel Urhausen, Wilfried Kindermann
{"title":"Does cumulating endurance training at the weekends impair training effectiveness?","authors":"Tim Meyer,&nbsp;Markus Auracher,&nbsp;Katrin Heeg,&nbsp;Axel Urhausen,&nbsp;Wilfried Kindermann","doi":"10.1097/01.hjr.0000198921.34814.4d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to occupational restrictions many people's recreational endurance activities are confined to the weekends. We intended to clarify if cumulating the training load in such a way diminishes endurance gains.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal study comparing training-induced changes within three independent samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight healthy untrained participants (45+/-8 years, 80+/-18 kg; 172+/-9 cm) were stratified for endurance capacity and sex and randomly assigned to three groups: 'weekend warrior' (n=13, two sessions per week on consecutive days, 75 min each, intensity 90% of the anaerobic threshold; baseline lactate+1.5 mmol/l), regular training (n=12, five sessions per week, 30 min each, same intensity as weekend warrior), and control (n=13, no training). Training was conducted over 12 weeks and monitored by means of heart rate. Identical graded treadmill protocols before and after the training program served for exercise prescription and assessment of endurance effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VO2max improved similarly in weekend warrior (+3.4 ml/min per kg) and register training (+1.5 ml/min per kg; P=0.20 between groups). Compared with controls (-1.0 ml/min per kg) this effect was significant for weekend warriors (P<0.01) whereas there was only a tendency for the regular training group (P=0.10). In comparison with controls (mean decrease, 3 beats/min), the average heart rate during exercise decreased significantly by 11 beats/min (weekend warriors, P<0.01) and 9 beats/min (regular training, P<0.05). There was no significant difference, however, between the weekend warrior and regular training groups (P=0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a middle-aged population of healthy untrained subjects, cumulating the training load at the weekends does not lead to an impairment of endurance gains in comparison with a smoother training distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50492,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"578-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.hjr.0000198921.34814.4d","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000198921.34814.4d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Background: Due to occupational restrictions many people's recreational endurance activities are confined to the weekends. We intended to clarify if cumulating the training load in such a way diminishes endurance gains.

Design: We conducted a longitudinal study comparing training-induced changes within three independent samples.

Methods: Thirty-eight healthy untrained participants (45+/-8 years, 80+/-18 kg; 172+/-9 cm) were stratified for endurance capacity and sex and randomly assigned to three groups: 'weekend warrior' (n=13, two sessions per week on consecutive days, 75 min each, intensity 90% of the anaerobic threshold; baseline lactate+1.5 mmol/l), regular training (n=12, five sessions per week, 30 min each, same intensity as weekend warrior), and control (n=13, no training). Training was conducted over 12 weeks and monitored by means of heart rate. Identical graded treadmill protocols before and after the training program served for exercise prescription and assessment of endurance effects.

Results: VO2max improved similarly in weekend warrior (+3.4 ml/min per kg) and register training (+1.5 ml/min per kg; P=0.20 between groups). Compared with controls (-1.0 ml/min per kg) this effect was significant for weekend warriors (P<0.01) whereas there was only a tendency for the regular training group (P=0.10). In comparison with controls (mean decrease, 3 beats/min), the average heart rate during exercise decreased significantly by 11 beats/min (weekend warriors, P<0.01) and 9 beats/min (regular training, P<0.05). There was no significant difference, however, between the weekend warrior and regular training groups (P=0.99).

Conclusion: In a middle-aged population of healthy untrained subjects, cumulating the training load at the weekends does not lead to an impairment of endurance gains in comparison with a smoother training distribution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在周末累积耐力训练是否会影响训练效果?
背景:由于职业的限制,许多人的休闲耐力活动仅限于周末。我们想弄清楚以这种方式累积训练负荷是否会减少耐力的提高。设计:我们进行了一项纵向研究,比较了三个独立样本中训练引起的变化。方法:38名未经训练的健康受试者(45+/-8岁,80+/-18 kg;172+/-9 cm)按耐力和性别分层,随机分为三组:“周末战士”(n=13,每周连续两天两次,每次75分钟,强度为无氧阈值的90%;基线乳酸+1.5 mmol/l),定期训练(n=12,每周5次,每次30分钟,强度与周末战士相同),对照组(n=13,不训练)。训练持续了12周,并通过心率监测。在训练计划之前和之后,相同的分级跑步机协议用于运动处方和耐力效果评估。结果:VO2max在周末战士(+3.4 ml/min / kg)和注册训练(+1.5 ml/min / kg)中也有类似的改善;组间P=0.20)。与对照组(-1.0 ml/min / kg)相比,这种效应在周末战士中是显著的(结论:在一个健康的未训练的中年人群中,与更平稳的训练分布相比,周末累积训练负荷不会导致耐力增益的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intrauterine growth restriction: no unifying risk factor for the metabolic syndrome in young adults. Moderated Poster Session IV: Exercise physiology Poster Session II: Prevention and health policy: tobacco, economics, clinical trials and quality of care Poster Session II: Epidemiology and public health Poster Session II: Cardiac rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1